Prev: Quantum Gravity 394.6: India Returns to Excellence with Gravitation as a Boundary Phenomenon
Next: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, May 7, 2010 Washington, DC
From: Michael Helland on 8 May 2010 04:15
This is my version of Hubble's Law, it yields t = 13771 million years
and x = 6881361979.836586 light years.

c = 299792
x = 0
t = 0
do while c > 0
t = t + 1
x = x + (c * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 1000000)
c = c - 21.77
enddo
?t
?x / (9.4605284 * 10^12)

Notice the velocity of light is reduced according to time, not
according to distance, and the distance is diminishing. That should
explain why we think the so-called expansion of space is accelerating.

So if I wanted to see how this affected the need for Dark Matter, is
there an example of masses and distances that need to fit together?
This method of calculating cosmological distances obviously yields
shorter distances to redshifted objects.
From: Sam Wormley on 8 May 2010 06:15
See: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html

For Ho = 71, OmegaM = 0.270, Omegavac = 0.730, z = 3.000

It is now 13.666 Gyr since the Big Bang.

>
> The age at redshift z was 2.190 Gyr.
> The light travel time was 11.476 Gyr.
> The comoving radial distance, which goes into Hubble's law, is 6460.6 Mpc or 21.072 Gly.
> The comoving volume within redshift z is 1129.524 Gpc3.
> The angular size distance DA is 1615.1 Mpc or 5.2678 Gly.
> This gives a scale of 7.830 kpc/".
> The luminosity distance DL is 25841.7 Mpc or 84.285 Gly.

From: eric gisse on 8 May 2010 21:33
Michael Helland wrote:

[snip idiocy]

> So if I wanted to see how this affected the need for Dark Matter, is
> there an example of masses and distances that need to fit together?

"Do my research for me."

[snip idiocy]
From: Michael Helland on 8 May 2010 22:12
On May 8, 6:33 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael Helland wrote:
>
> [snip idiocy]
>
> > So if I wanted to see how this affected the need for Dark Matter, is
> > there an example of masses and distances that need to fit together?
>
> "Do my research for me."

Hey, I solved the acceleration problem with my formula, v = c - Ht
where H is in units of km/sec/millionyears.

The least you could do is stop calling me an idiot.
From: nuny on 8 May 2010 22:59
On May 8, 7:12 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 8, 6:33 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Michael Helland wrote:
>
> > [snip idiocy]
>
> > > So if I wanted to see how this affected the need for Dark Matter, is
> > > there an example of masses and distances that need to fit together?
>
> > "Do my research for me."
>
> Hey, I solved the acceleration problem with my formula, v = c - Ht
> where H is in units of km/sec/millionyears.
>
> The least you could do is stop calling me an idiot.

According to both standard cosmology and your theory, light that was
originally
emitted in the visible will at some distance have redshifted into the
microwave (CMBR).

According to you, when it started out the CMBR must have been fresh
(fast) high energy photons that at our distance have decayed to stale
(slow) microwaves.

But, my radar gun also produces fresh microwave photons
which being freshly minted, according to your "theory" should move at
an unaltered c.

What then, is the difference between your slow "stale" microwaves
and my fast fresh ones?


Mark L. Fergerson
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Quantum Gravity 394.6: India Returns to Excellence with Gravitation as a Boundary Phenomenon
Next: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, May 7, 2010 Washington, DC