installpkg messing up perms
in [Slackware]
|
From: Chick Tower on 14 Jul 2010 13:31 On 2010-07-13, Dario Niedermann <M8R-cthw2f(a)spamherelots.com> wrote: > Gee, I swear this is the most arrogant and self-righteous community I've > ever seen, bar none. LOL! No wonder you're trying to act like the leader around here. You think you are the perfect embodiment of our values. -- Chick Tower For e-mail: aols2 DOT sent DOT towerboy AT xoxy DOT net
From: Loki Harfagr on 14 Jul 2010 13:42 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:04:12 -0700, Keith Keller did cat : > On 2010-07-14, Dario Niedermann <M8R-cthw2f(a)spamherelots.com> wrote: >> >> For one thing I'm running 12.2. Secondly, too many bozos in this >> community do not deserve any improvement to the program. .... > #3 it is. *sigh* Sometimes I really don't like being proven correct. it was an easy bet, wasn't it :D) > Wait, did I see that right?!? > >> For one thing I'm running 12.2. Secondly, too many bozos > ^^^^^ > The BOZO list is back!!!!!!!~ Hide the goat! Warm smell of colitas, rising up through the air ;-)
From: Dario Niedermann on 14 Jul 2010 13:53 Mike Jones <luck(a)dasteem.invalid> wrote: > Way to win friends and influence people there Sparky. > Good luck with that. A bunch of dim-witted fanboys is certainly not the kind of people I want to have as friends, much less influence. -- > head -n1 /etc/*-{version,release} && uname -moprs Slackware 12.2.0 Linux 2.6.27.31-smp i686 AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology MK-36 GNU/Linux
From: Mike Jones on 14 Jul 2010 14:09 Responding to Dario Niedermann: > Mike Jones <luck(a)dasteem.invalid> wrote: > >> Way to win friends and influence people there Sparky. Good luck with >> that. > > A bunch of dim-witted fanboys is certainly not the kind of people I want > to have as friends, much less influence. Congratulations! You scored a double-whammy! Lets do the maths here. At least 5 /major players/ on this NG have reacted to you with (polite) frustration at your dismissing and insulting responses to their attempts to help you with a problem that appears to be unique to the machine you are working on. (IOW, /you/ probably screwed it up somehow.) You claim the helpful chaps here are all "dim-witted fanboys" Thats a 5:1 ratio /against/ your claim, and a 5:1 ratio /for/ the idea you are a prat who doesn't know or care when somebody is making effort on their behalf. /The/ problem, and the resulting problems, are threfore most likely down to you and your apparent "the world owes me something" attitude. Dipso fatso. Case for the defense rests m'lud. (Tip: I'd suggest some humble pie and a few apologies about now.) -- *=( http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/ *=( For all your UK news needs.
From: Martin on 14 Jul 2010 15:15
Dario Niedermann wrote: > Sylvain Robitaille <syl(a)alcor.concordia.ca> wrote: > >> You were going to fix it. Do you have a patch yet? > > You can ask me for a patch until you're blue in the face. You're simply > not going to get it. > >> Not exactly. "It's always been that way because we don't think >> there's a problem with it, so it must be good." > > Looks like you should stop asking me for a fix, then. > > You don't get it, do you? Nobody has the slightest interest in actually using your patch. Everybody is just waiting to see whether you can back up your claims or whether you are just a noisy bigmouth. Currently all the evidence points to the latter. Martin |