Prev: bash unresponsive
Next: I am thinking about a dual boot with two linux distros one 32 bit and the other 64 bit
From: peter on 3 Apr 2010 08:00
Dear All
Please take a look this graph. http://forum2.kingofcoders.com/viewthread.php?tid=896&extra=page%3D1

The gateway server has two IP, one for the real IP from ISP, one for
the 192.168.100.12. All the computers connected to the switch has an
IP 192.168.100.X . And all the computer connected to the wireless
router is 192.168.200.X.

my problem is: 192.168.100.X can ping 192.168.200.X . But 200.x can't
ping 100.x

The gateway server is linux.

please help
thanks
from Peter (cmk128(a)hotmail.com)
From: Reinardt Behm on 3 Apr 2010 09:18
On Saturday 03 April 2010 14:00 peter wrote:

> Dear All
> Please take a look this graph.
> http://forum2.kingofcoders.com/viewthread.php?tid=896&extra=page%3D1
>
> The gateway server has two IP, one for the real IP from ISP, one for
> the 192.168.100.12. All the computers connected to the switch has an
> IP 192.168.100.X . And all the computer connected to the wireless
> router is 192.168.200.X.
>
> my problem is: 192.168.100.X can ping 192.168.200.X . But 200.x can't
> ping 100.x
>
> The gateway server is linux.
>
> please help
> thanks
> from Peter (cmk128(a)hotmail.com)

Hi Peter,

192.168.200.x is a different logical network than .200.x. Does 200.x have an
entry in the routing table for this network?
What does
> route
say?

--
Reinhardt Behm, Bodenheim, Germany, reinhardt.behm(a)t-online.de

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: bash unresponsive
Next: I am thinking about a dual boot with two linux distros one 32 bit and the other 64 bit