From: SteveG on 12 Mar 2007 19:43 SteveG wrote: > Is there a good mp3 player for openSUSE 10.2? > > I've got thousands of mp3 music files but Amorak says it can't play them :-( > > TIA > > Steve G Cheers to one and all ... sure to find a solution amongst that lot. Steve G
From: Ram on 13 Mar 2007 16:16 noi wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:32:41 +0000, SteveG wrote this: > >> Is there a good mp3 player for openSUSE 10.2? >> >> I've got thousands of mp3 music files but Amorak says it can't play them >> :-( >> >> TIA >> >> Steve G > Install xine libs and w32codecs from packman. > and use Kaffeine. Amarok has problems, Kaffeine doesn't. > > Kaffeine will play from playlists or directories. I haven't exceeded it's > limit yet but I'm not trying to play 1000s of tunes at once. Kaffeine is > the better gui multimedia player but mplayer is the best > all-round multi-media player/encoder. > > # requires gui > $ kaffeine ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls > > # does not require gui or the gui frontend gmplayer > $ mplayer ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls Sorry to disagree but Amarok is a a better audio player then Kaffeine Ram
From: noi on 13 Mar 2007 17:32 On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:16:14 +0000, Ram wrote this: > noi wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:32:41 +0000, SteveG wrote this: >> >>> Is there a good mp3 player for openSUSE 10.2? >>> >>> I've got thousands of mp3 music files but Amorak says it can't play >>> them >>> :-( >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> Steve G >> Install xine libs and w32codecs from packman. and use Kaffeine. Amarok >> has problems, Kaffeine doesn't. >> >> Kaffeine will play from playlists or directories. I haven't exceeded >> it's limit yet but I'm not trying to play 1000s of tunes at once. >> Kaffeine is the better gui multimedia player but mplayer is the best >> all-round multi-media player/encoder. >> >> # requires gui >> $ kaffeine ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls >> >> # does not require gui or the gui frontend gmplayer $ mplayer >> ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls > > > Sorry to disagree but Amarok is a a better audio player then Kaffeine > > Ram Good to disagree. Kaffeine works using std. xine and mplayer libraries. IIRC Aramok does not. I think you interpreted multimedia player to mean audio player. Maybe it's just a matter of taste.
From: Zbycho BikeRider on 13 Mar 2007 17:55 noi wrote: >> Sorry to disagree but Amarok is a a better audio player then Kaffeine >> >> Ram > Good to disagree. Kaffeine works using std. xine and mplayer > libraries. IIRC Aramok does not. > > I think you interpreted multimedia player to mean audio > player. Maybe it's just a matter of taste. > Amarok can show you information about a record being played, about a musician/group. Amarok can automatically display the text of a song, on the fly. In amarok I can direct output to any of my two sound cards. Through klineak i configured my A4TECH multimedia keyboard to change volume, skip to next song, pause and play, change volume in Amarok, all directly by pressing buttons on a keyboard. It took me a minute cause it was already pre-configured. Amarok makes navigation through all your collection, through hundreds of albums, artists, many genres, a breeze. Now, tell me how to do it in kaffeine... -- Yours Virtually, Zibi
From: Charles philip Chan on 13 Mar 2007 18:58 On 13 Mar 2007, noi(a)siam.com wrote: > Good to disagree. Kaffeine works using std. xine and mplayer > libraries. IIRC Aramok does not. Huh, Amarok uses standard libraris also: (1) Xine backend: libxine (2) Gstreamer backend: gstreamer (3) Helix backend: helix engine (4) aRTs backend: aRTs (5) NMM backend: NMM (Networked multimedia) etc. Also mplayer is *not* a library. Charles
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: SuSE 10.2 video output Xv with black video screen Next: What sets up network interfaces? |