From: SteveG on
SteveG wrote:
> Is there a good mp3 player for openSUSE 10.2?
>
> I've got thousands of mp3 music files but Amorak says it can't play them :-(
>
> TIA
>
> Steve G

Cheers to one and all ... sure to find a solution amongst that lot.

Steve G
From: Ram on
noi wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:32:41 +0000, SteveG wrote this:
>
>> Is there a good mp3 player for openSUSE 10.2?
>>
>> I've got thousands of mp3 music files but Amorak says it can't play them
>> :-(
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Steve G
> Install xine libs and w32codecs from packman.
> and use Kaffeine. Amarok has problems, Kaffeine doesn't.
>
> Kaffeine will play from playlists or directories. I haven't exceeded it's
> limit yet but I'm not trying to play 1000s of tunes at once. Kaffeine is
> the better gui multimedia player but mplayer is the best
> all-round multi-media player/encoder.
>
> # requires gui
> $ kaffeine ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls
>
> # does not require gui or the gui frontend gmplayer
> $ mplayer ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls


Sorry to disagree but Amarok is a a better audio player then Kaffeine

Ram
From: noi on
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:16:14 +0000, Ram wrote this:

> noi wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:32:41 +0000, SteveG wrote this:
>>
>>> Is there a good mp3 player for openSUSE 10.2?
>>>
>>> I've got thousands of mp3 music files but Amorak says it can't play
>>> them
>>> :-(
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> Steve G
>> Install xine libs and w32codecs from packman. and use Kaffeine. Amarok
>> has problems, Kaffeine doesn't.
>>
>> Kaffeine will play from playlists or directories. I haven't exceeded
>> it's limit yet but I'm not trying to play 1000s of tunes at once.
>> Kaffeine is the better gui multimedia player but mplayer is the best
>> all-round multi-media player/encoder.
>>
>> # requires gui
>> $ kaffeine ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls
>>
>> # does not require gui or the gui frontend gmplayer $ mplayer
>> ~/music/*mp3 ~/music/*m3u ~/music/*.pls
>
>
> Sorry to disagree but Amarok is a a better audio player then Kaffeine
>
> Ram
Good to disagree. Kaffeine works using std. xine and mplayer
libraries. IIRC Aramok does not.

I think you interpreted multimedia player to mean audio
player. Maybe it's just a matter of taste.


From: Zbycho BikeRider on
noi wrote:
>> Sorry to disagree but Amarok is a a better audio player then Kaffeine
>>
>> Ram
> Good to disagree. Kaffeine works using std. xine and mplayer
> libraries. IIRC Aramok does not.
>
> I think you interpreted multimedia player to mean audio
> player. Maybe it's just a matter of taste.
>

Amarok can show you information about a record being played, about a
musician/group. Amarok can automatically display the text of a song, on
the fly.
In amarok I can direct output to any of my two sound cards.
Through klineak i configured my A4TECH multimedia keyboard to change
volume, skip to next song, pause and play, change volume in Amarok, all
directly by pressing buttons on a keyboard. It took me a minute cause it
was already pre-configured.
Amarok makes navigation through all your collection, through hundreds of
albums, artists, many genres, a breeze.

Now, tell me how to do it in kaffeine...

--
Yours Virtually, Zibi
From: Charles philip Chan on
On 13 Mar 2007, noi(a)siam.com wrote:

> Good to disagree. Kaffeine works using std. xine and mplayer
> libraries. IIRC Aramok does not.

Huh, Amarok uses standard libraris also:

(1) Xine backend: libxine

(2) Gstreamer backend: gstreamer

(3) Helix backend: helix engine

(4) aRTs backend: aRTs

(5) NMM backend: NMM (Networked multimedia)

etc. Also mplayer is *not* a library.

Charles