Prev: SuSE 10.2 video output Xv with black video screen
Next: What sets up network interfaces?
From: Chris Cox on 14 Mar 2007 14:30
noi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:11:10 +0000, Ram wrote this:
>
...
>> The OP was talking about MP3 player not multimedia player.
>>
>> Ram
>
> True but I was pointing out that kaffeine also plays wma, ogg, wmv, avi,
> mp1, mpg, jpg, etc.

Yes... I know that I would love to see a blending of Kaffeine and
Amarok. It would make for the ideal SUPER media player (about a
thousand times better than Windows Media Player).
From: Charles philip Chan on 14 Mar 2007 15:08
On 14 Mar 2007, notccox(a)notairmail.net wrote:

> Yes... I know that I would love to see a blending of Kaffeine and
> Amarok. It would make for the ideal SUPER media player (about a
> thousand times better than Windows Media Player).

The goal of Amarok is to be a good audio player. However, the svn
version of Amarok does have basic video support. It is intended for
music videos.

Charles

--
dprintk("kick_rx: maybe kicking\n");
linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/ns83820.c
From: noi on 14 Mar 2007 17:57
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:47:10 -0400, Charles philip Chan wrote this:

> On 14 Mar 2007, noi(a)siam.com wrote:
>
>> Yep you're right! Aramok's the world greatest mp3 player for Linux.
>>
>> Is it still supported?
>
> Why the sarcasm? I was just pointing out that Amarok uses standard libs
> also, and that mplayer is not a library. FYI, I don't use Amarok, although
> I keep up with it's development. I think Amarok is a great program.
> However, it is too heavy weight for my taste and I don't need all that eye
> candy. I personally use mpd on the backend and a simple GNUstep frontend
> called MPDCon- I am a Stepper.
>
> Charles

Yeah. :( You know, my post was meant to say, why bother with an "mp3"
only player when a multimedia player does it all?

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: SuSE 10.2 video output Xv with black video screen
Next: What sets up network interfaces?