From: Terry Reedy on
On 1/28/2010 2:51 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> Carl Banks wrote:

>> Regardless of how magnaminous the people of PSF are, the unfortunate
>> reality is that trademark owners are forced by the law to be
>> "particularly petty". PSF's IP lawyer will advise not to allow
>> unsanctioned fork of Python 2.7 to call itself Python 2.8.
>>
> But if it were sanctioned ... ? We *are* pretty magnanimous ;-)

I think it foolish to speculate in the absence of specifics. If some
people wanted to coninue bug-fix maintainance of 2.7 after the main
group of developers is done with it, in 5 years, then no new name is
needed. If some people wanted to backport additional 3.x features, while
still keeping the old, obsolete stuff around, then '2.8' would be
appropriate. If some people wanted to add a collection of incompatible
new features, perhaps some that Guido has rejected for 'Python', so that
they were producing a real fork, then a new name should be used.

I consider the first option possible, assuming that significant bugs
still remain in 5 years. The second seems more dubious, as the
developers have already backported most of what they thought sensible.
The third has always been possible, and has been done, and there would
be nothing really special about using 2.7 as a base.

Terry Jan Reedy

From: Ethan Furman on
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> 4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
>
> FALSE

What?!? Drat!!! Guess I'll have to learn Lisp... ;)

~Ethan~
From: Ben Finney on
Antoine Pitrou <solipsis(a)pitrou.net> writes:

> Le Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:19:24 +0000, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
> > 4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
> >
> > FALSE - Python 3 coders are no more likely to get a date than
> > any other programmer.
>
> They spend less time coding, so they /can/ get more "dates" (what a
> strange English word) :-)

Perhaps Steven could tell you about a lovely Australian meaning for the
word “date”.

--
\ “Even if the voices in my head are not real, they have pretty |
`\ good ideas.” —anonymous |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
From: Mensanator on
On Jan 28, 11:35 am, Ethan Furman <et...(a)stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > 4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
>
> >     FALSE
>
> What?!?  Drat!!!  Guess I'll have to learn Lisp...  ;)

Irresisible? Ha! The chicks will think you have a harelip.

>
> ~Ethan~

From: Gib Bogle on
Ethan Furman wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> 4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
>>
>> FALSE
>
> What?!? Drat!!! Guess I'll have to learn Lisp... ;)
>
> ~Ethan~

Learn to say this fast, you'll impress the hell out of them:

Chaps with chapped lips lisp.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: Ad hoc lists vs ad hoc tuples
Next: Python and Ruby