photons and reflection
in [Basics]
|
Prev: Question about common-collector circuits.
Next: Absolutly Free Lectures on C++ by MIT Studied Professor
From: BURT on 11 Dec 2009 08:39 On Dec 11, 5:02 am, N0S...(a)daqarta.com (Bob Masta) wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:40:26 -0800 (PST), BURT > > <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >A mirror is an example that dispoves quantum mechanics. The reflection > >is absorption and emmision taking place accross all visual > >frequencies. Quantum mechanics is wrong about quantization of energy > >levels for a mirror's atoms. It doesn't work. The broader truth is not > >quantization and quantum mechanics needs to be corrected. > > So, according to your hypothesis, if a mirror is > absorbing and re-emitting, what cause the emission > to have a particular angle? > > Just curious... > > Bob Masta > > DAQARTA v5.00 > Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis > www.daqarta.com > Scope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, Sound Level Meter > Frequency Counter, FREE Signal Generator > Pitch Track, Pitch-to-MIDI > DaqMusic - FREE MUSIC, Forever! > (Some assembly required) > Science (and fun!) with your sound card! Quantization is violated. Mitch Raemsch
From: Skywise on 11 Dec 2009 17:24 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:e9749752-39a5-411f-b626- b2dc1dbeeccf(a)x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > You're dumb. You're a crank. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
From: BURT on 11 Dec 2009 19:07 On Dec 11, 2:24 pm, Skywise <i...(a)oblivion.nothing.com> wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:e9749752-39a5-411f-b626- > b2dc1dbee...(a)x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > > > You're dumb. > > You're a crank. > > Brian > --http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism > Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html > Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html > Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? Show me where I am wrong Brian and how you are right in thermodynamics. Mitch Raemsch
From: Skywise on 12 Dec 2009 21:52 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:3a7407c1-d14a-4d33-8a67- 7c526dbc6218(a)h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > On Dec 11, 2:24�pm, Skywise <i...(a)oblivion.nothing.com> wrote: >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:e9749752-39a5-411f-b626- >> b2dc1dbee...(a)x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> >> > You're dumb. >> >> You're a crank. >> >> Brian >> --http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism >> Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html >> Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html >> Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? > > Show me where I am wrong Brian and how you are right in > thermodynamics. I climbed Mount Everest. Prove I didn't. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
From: Autymn D. C. on 12 Dec 2009 22:34
On Dec 8, 12:54 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Dec 8, 3:39 am, p.kins...(a)ic.ac.uk wrote: > > > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > The truth is meant to be known. Quantization is the lesser > > > concept than full ranges of energy. > > > The process of quantization doesn't require discrete, countable > > sets of EM mode functions (although that may well make the > > mathematics easier). Quantization doesn't necessarily restrict > > the allowed energies. > > Quantization is defined as making energy transitions discrete for the > electron. > It does not accomadate a mirror. > > Show me where I am wrong. A networkling or molecular band material has finite bodies and finite lifetime; therefore it has finite transitions. Continvum radiation is a figure of speech for a spectrum's thorouhness and there's no threshhold where a spectrum becomes sheer--"sheer" also a relative term. |