point particle vs particle with structure
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Properties of a preferred frame, an inertial frame in SR and
Next: Quantum Gravity 402.4: One-Way Entanglement in Expansion-Contraction
From: artful on 19 Jul 2010 02:07 On Jul 19, 3:51 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > On Jul 18, 9:49 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> Of course there are points .. what a silly thing to say. > > Show me a point. > > john here ---> . :) There's one at your centre of gravity.
From: john on 19 Jul 2010 02:17 On Jul 18, 9:03 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> writes: > >Yet when I suggest an electron has > >structure and a dynamic equilibrium going on > >involving energy radiation and absorption > >at a much smaller scale, I am accused of > >'word salad'. > > Try posting something that actually makes more sense than random words of > physics thrown together at random (word salad). If you're going to create > new ideas or whatever, at least make it so that it matches current -> reality. Heisenberg-violating subparticles that magically radiate away -> without losing energy/evaporating away certainly don't do that. -> Especially when you say they radiate neutrinos, but neutrinos aren't even -> bosons. -> - OK, the sun radiates neutrinos. I am saying that electrons are made up of multiple sun-like bodies on a much smaller scale radiating sun-like radiation on a much smaller scale. These would be photons and neutrinos, but much, much smaller, but much, much more of them. As for violating Heisenburg, if subparticles re-occur infinitely, there's a lot of movement out there, bud. john
From: eric gisse on 19 Jul 2010 05:44 john wrote: > On Jul 18, 9:49 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > >>>> Of course there are points .. what a silly thing to say. > > Show me a point. > > john You can't show us a clue either, does that mean you don't have one?
From: john on 19 Jul 2010 07:50 On Jul 19, 3:44 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > john wrote: > > On Jul 18, 9:49 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> Of course there are points .. what a silly thing to say. > > > Show me a point. > > > john > > You can't show us a clue either, does that mean you don't have one? No, I'm not talking about your head, Eric. Show me a point- where is this real-life point? john
From: Y.Porat on 19 Jul 2010 09:14
On Jul 19, 7:51 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > On Jul 18, 9:49 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> Of course there are points .. what a silly thing to say. > > Show me a point. > > john ---------------- John why do you bother to answer a pigshit psychopath anonymous with 3 anonymous names ??!! Y.P ------------------ Y.P -------------- |