point particle vs particle with structure
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Properties of a preferred frame, an inertial frame in SR and
Next: Quantum Gravity 402.4: One-Way Entanglement in Expansion-Contraction
From: Jacko on 20 Jul 2010 05:13 On 20 July, 10:01, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 20, 6:14 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > And 0*infinity for that too is part of the singular complex. The > > irremovable singularities of e^x and ln x would also make your > > different handling of * and / as silly as treating + from - in any > > proof. > > > The essential singular complex is a multiplicity of syptomatic > > indeterminates, discontinuities and dis-focused lack of convergence of > > result. There is only one to be analysed, and so is singular. > > > Sticking to subjects I know? Umm? I do know you should stick to a fan > > (of the rotary variaty). > > You have no idea of maths nor the meaning of the terms you are > stringing together. Learn some maths, then come back .. and try to at > least post something coherent next time. Coherent? You mean like prefactored in 'fartful' normal form? But seriously, I'm not interested in your doctors paper issue, I'm interested in the utility of mathematical algebras with no singularity complex.
From: artful on 20 Jul 2010 05:25 On Jul 20, 7:10 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 July, 09:58, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 20, 5:48 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 0/0 is indeterminate .. it can have any finite value. ie if x = 0/0, > > > > then that means 0*x = 0, which is true for any finite value of x. > > > > Of course it can't, it must have them all at once. > > > Nope .. it does not have to have all the answers .. even though any > > answer works. > > Works is a very debatable series convergence. You're posting gibberish again. Using big words doesn't make you look intelligent when you don't use them correctly. > > > They are all roots. > > > Yes they are .. that what I just said .. it can have any finite value > > > Try to keep up > > I'm trying o master partial fraction GCD monger. Then get back to your homework and stop trolling > > > Picking prefered roots is one thing, saying the whole divmul zero > > > complex is not the one problem is missing the point. > > > Word soup .. do you have ANY idea what the words you use mean, or what > > is being discussed > > I do yes, No .. you don't > if you don't your just not trying to factor the lingo, to > attempt to learn anything o master. More gibberish > > > > -x/0 and x/0 are infinite when x is non-zero (+ve or -ve as > > > > appropriate) > > > > Or minus infinite. > > > That's what I just said .. +ve or -ve. You're really very poor at > > comprehension. Perhaps more familiarity with the topic would help? > > No, my comprehension is excellent, I very poor at being your > underdog ;-) Get used to it. > > > > None of those are examples of a singularity. > > > > > Now .. if you said f(x) = 1/x, then you get a singularity at x = 0. > > > > > Maybe you should stick to subjects you know and understand ... are > > > > there any? > > > > Yes but when you've actually studied Cauchy and winding number you'll > > > look at 1/x^2 differently. > > > I have an honors degree in mathematics .. I understand it far better > > that your apparent limited grasp. > > Yes the apparent understanding really just belays the reality of the > situation. You probably understand even less than you appear to.
From: Jacko on 20 Jul 2010 05:52 On 20 July, 10:25, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 20, 7:10 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 20 July, 09:58, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 20, 5:48 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > 0/0 is indeterminate .. it can have any finite value. ie if x = 0/0, > > > > > then that means 0*x = 0, which is true for any finite value of x. > > > > > Of course it can't, it must have them all at once. > > > > Nope .. it does not have to have all the answers .. even though any > > > answer works. > > > Works is a very debatable series convergence. > > You're posting gibberish again. Using big words doesn't make you look > intelligent when you don't use them correctly. > > > > > They are all roots. > > > > Yes they are .. that what I just said .. it can have any finite value > > > > Try to keep up > > > I'm trying o master partial fraction GCD monger. > > Then get back to your homework and stop trolling > > > > > Picking prefered roots is one thing, saying the whole divmul zero > > > > complex is not the one problem is missing the point. > > > > Word soup .. do you have ANY idea what the words you use mean, or what > > > is being discussed > > > I do yes, > > No .. you don't > > > if you don't your just not trying to factor the lingo, to > > attempt to learn anything o master. > > More gibberish > > > > > > -x/0 and x/0 are infinite when x is non-zero (+ve or -ve as > > > > > appropriate) > > > > > Or minus infinite. > > > > That's what I just said .. +ve or -ve. You're really very poor at > > > comprehension. Perhaps more familiarity with the topic would help? > > > No, my comprehension is excellent, I very poor at being your > > underdog ;-) > > Get used to it. > > > > > > None of those are examples of a singularity. > > > > > > Now .. if you said f(x) = 1/x, then you get a singularity at x = 0. > > > > > > Maybe you should stick to subjects you know and understand ... are > > > > > there any? > > > > > Yes but when you've actually studied Cauchy and winding number you'll > > > > look at 1/x^2 differently. > > > > I have an honors degree in mathematics .. I understand it far better > > > that your apparent limited grasp. > > > Yes the apparent understanding really just belays the reality of the > > situation. > > You probably understand even less than you appear to. Probably, probly, how you use your words. Seems inference of meaning is dead in the water in thine head.
From: artful on 20 Jul 2010 06:03 On Jul 20, 7:52 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 July, 10:25, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 20, 7:10 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 20 July, 09:58, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 20, 5:48 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > 0/0 is indeterminate .. it can have any finite value. ie if x = 0/0, > > > > > > then that means 0*x = 0, which is true for any finite value of x. > > > > > > Of course it can't, it must have them all at once. > > > > > Nope .. it does not have to have all the answers .. even though any > > > > answer works. > > > > Works is a very debatable series convergence. > > > You're posting gibberish again. Using big words doesn't make you look > > intelligent when you don't use them correctly. > > > > > > They are all roots. > > > > > Yes they are .. that what I just said .. it can have any finite value > > > > > Try to keep up > > > > I'm trying o master partial fraction GCD monger. > > > Then get back to your homework and stop trolling > > > > > > Picking prefered roots is one thing, saying the whole divmul zero > > > > > complex is not the one problem is missing the point. > > > > > Word soup .. do you have ANY idea what the words you use mean, or what > > > > is being discussed > > > > I do yes, > > > No .. you don't > > > > if you don't your just not trying to factor the lingo, to > > > attempt to learn anything o master. > > > More gibberish > > > > > > > -x/0 and x/0 are infinite when x is non-zero (+ve or -ve as > > > > > > appropriate) > > > > > > Or minus infinite. > > > > > That's what I just said .. +ve or -ve. You're really very poor at > > > > comprehension. Perhaps more familiarity with the topic would help? > > > > No, my comprehension is excellent, I very poor at being your > > > underdog ;-) > > > Get used to it. > > > > > > > None of those are examples of a singularity. > > > > > > > Now .. if you said f(x) = 1/x, then you get a singularity at x = 0. > > > > > > > Maybe you should stick to subjects you know and understand ... are > > > > > > there any? > > > > > > Yes but when you've actually studied Cauchy and winding number you'll > > > > > look at 1/x^2 differently. > > > > > I have an honors degree in mathematics .. I understand it far better > > > > that your apparent limited grasp. > > > > Yes the apparent understanding really just belays the reality of the > > > situation. > > > You probably understand even less than you appear to. > > Probably, probly, how you use your words. Seems inference of meaning > is dead in the water in thine head. There's too much noise from your gibberish to infer any significant meaning, other than the obvious meaning of your posts: that you're an ignorant troll.
From: Jacko on 20 Jul 2010 06:23
> There's too much noise from your gibberish to infer any significant > meaning, other than the obvious meaning of your posts: that you're an > ignorant troll. Yes, I'd ignore any indoctrination just to keep my head free of it's limited pattern matching set. ((S=>P(M))!=(S<=>M)) |