From: mikeyhsd on
have NO specific NEED at this time.

keep seeing warning that IPV4 addresses are about exhausted.

just trying to get prepared.


--

mikeyhsd(a)hotmail.com





"ps56k" <pschuman_no_spam_me(a)interserv.com> wrote in message news:hjsujd$1a8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...

"Bob" <bob(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:0KGdnY3E4JTIMvzWnZ2dnUVZ8gidnZ2d(a)bt.com...
> On 28/01/2010 14:17, mikeyhsd wrote:
>> anyone know of a wireless router that provides ipv4 and ipv6 support.
>> looks like my linksys (WRT160N) only provides ipv4.
>>

Just wondering what your situation or scenario is that requires ipv6 support
?

From: mikeyhsd on
thanx, will do some further research.


--

mikeyhsd(a)hotmail.com





"Bob" <bob(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:0KGdnY3E4JTIMvzWnZ2dnUVZ8gidnZ2d(a)bt.com...
On 28/01/2010 14:17, mikeyhsd wrote:
> anyone know of a wireless router that provides ipv4 and ipv6 support.
> looks like my linksys (WRT160N) only provides ipv4.
>
> --
>
> mikeyhsd(a)hotmail.com <mailto:mikeyhsd(a)hotmail.com>
>
According to Google
<http://www.sixxs.net/wiki/Routers> (several are wireless)
you could also check the Phase1/Phase2 lists at
<http://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=home>
From: alexd on
Meanwhile, at the alt.internet.wireless Job Justification Hearings, mikeyhsd
chose the tried and tested strategy of:

> have NO specific NEED at this time.
>
> keep seeing warning that IPV4 addresses are about exhausted.

It feels like there have been warnings about IPv4 exhaustion on a monthly
basis for the past ten years. Apparently in China, some internet users are
behind many layers of NAT, so we'll know we've hit a crunch point when ISPs
are doing that on a widespread basis in the west.

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx)
09:37:52 up 8 days, 12:39, 5 users, load average: 0.02, 0.10, 0.13
DIMENSION-CONTROLLING FORT DOH HAS NOW BEEN DEMOLISHED,
AND TIME STARTED FLOWING REVERSELY

From: Bob on
On 29/01/2010 00:06, mikeyhsd wrote:
> thanx, will do some further research.
>
> --
>
> mikeyhsd(a)hotmail.com <mailto:mikeyhsd(a)hotmail.com>
>

If you were a Comcast user you could get involved in their trials.
<http://www.comcast6.net/>
From: bod43 on
On 29 Jan, 10:24, Bob <b...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 29/01/2010 00:06, mikeyhsd wrote:
>
> > thanx, will do some further research.

Cisco do IPV6, obviously.

For home DSL users IPV6 may be a long, long way away
as a matter of necessity. I suspect that the major ISPs
are already all geared up for it internally but I am not
by any means sure.