router with ipv6
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: Article about home wireless "congestion"
Next: Weekly Deals from OfficeMAX hurry sale ends January 30th
From: Kurt Ullman on 31 Jan 2010 12:27 In article <leebm51v96n47e956mq7fsgorgme900und(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:12:35 -0600, > ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid (Moe Trin) wrote in > <slrnhm78sr.1dm.ibuprofin(a)compton.phx.az.us>: > > >NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically > >reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server. > > Nonsense. Google Groups more likely. If only because so many people (such as myself) have blocked GG entirely because of the spammer problems. -- I get off on '57 Chevys I get off on screamin' guitars --Eric Clapton
From: John Navas on 31 Jan 2010 13:59 On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:27:38 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in <yPSdnQOCnNUWIPjWnZ2dnUVZ_spi4p2d(a)earthlink.com>: >In article <leebm51v96n47e956mq7fsgorgme900und(a)4ax.com>, > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:12:35 -0600, >> ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid (Moe Trin) wrote in >> <slrnhm78sr.1dm.ibuprofin(a)compton.phx.az.us>: >> >> >NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically >> >reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server. >> >> Nonsense. > > Google Groups more likely. If only because so many people (such as >myself) have blocked GG entirely because of the spammer problems. Nobody cares that you and a few others choose to engage in such silliness. -- Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us> John FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
From: Christopher A. Lee on 31 Jan 2010 14:07 On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:59:40 -0800, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:27:38 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> >wrote in <yPSdnQOCnNUWIPjWnZ2dnUVZ_spi4p2d(a)earthlink.com>: > >>In article <leebm51v96n47e956mq7fsgorgme900und(a)4ax.com>, >> John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:12:35 -0600, >>> ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid (Moe Trin) wrote in >>> <slrnhm78sr.1dm.ibuprofin(a)compton.phx.az.us>: >>> >>> >NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically >>> >reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server. >>> >>> Nonsense. >> >> Google Groups more likely. If only because so many people (such as >>myself) have blocked GG entirely because of the spammer problems. > >Nobody cares that you and a few others choose to engage in such >silliness. Trolling? Plenty of us block google with a higher proprity retrieve on specific posters. It reduces traffic by about two thirds, mostly spam.
From: Kurt Ullman on 31 Jan 2010 15:38 In article <t5lbm5p2sqqo8bf3jbt6dkjcsh1o4s4rem(a)4ax.com>, Christopher A. Lee <calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:59:40 -0800, John Navas > <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > > >On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:27:38 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> > >wrote in <yPSdnQOCnNUWIPjWnZ2dnUVZ_spi4p2d(a)earthlink.com>: > > > >>In article <leebm51v96n47e956mq7fsgorgme900und(a)4ax.com>, > >> John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:12:35 -0600, > >>> ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid (Moe Trin) wrote in > >>> <slrnhm78sr.1dm.ibuprofin(a)compton.phx.az.us>: > >>> > >>> >NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically > >>> >reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server. > >>> > >>> Nonsense. > >> > >> Google Groups more likely. If only because so many people (such as > >>myself) have blocked GG entirely because of the spammer problems. > > > >Nobody cares that you and a few others choose to engage in such > >silliness. > > Trolling? > > Plenty of us block google with a higher proprity retrieve on specific > posters. > > It reduces traffic by about two thirds, mostly spam. Glad to have another Comrade in Silliness. Apparently JN cared enuff to reply. -- I get off on '57 Chevys I get off on screamin' guitars --Eric Clapton
From: Christopher A. Lee on 31 Jan 2010 15:51
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:38:02 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >In article <t5lbm5p2sqqo8bf3jbt6dkjcsh1o4s4rem(a)4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <calee(a)optonline.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:59:40 -0800, John Navas >> <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >> >On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:27:38 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> >> >wrote in <yPSdnQOCnNUWIPjWnZ2dnUVZ_spi4p2d(a)earthlink.com>: >> > >> >>In article <leebm51v96n47e956mq7fsgorgme900und(a)4ax.com>, >> >> John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:12:35 -0600, >> >>> ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid (Moe Trin) wrote in >> >>> <slrnhm78sr.1dm.ibuprofin(a)compton.phx.az.us>: >> >>> >> >>> >NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically >> >>> >reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server. >> >>> >> >>> Nonsense. >> >> >> >> Google Groups more likely. If only because so many people (such as >> >>myself) have blocked GG entirely because of the spammer problems. >> > >> >Nobody cares that you and a few others choose to engage in such >> >silliness. >> >> Trolling? >> >> Plenty of us block google with a higher proprity retrieve on specific >> posters. >> >> It reduces traffic by about two thirds, mostly spam. > > Glad to have another Comrade in Silliness. Apparently JN cared enuff >to reply. It wasn't a rhetorical question whan I aid "trolling?". |