8051 Keil C site updated! [Embedded]

Prev: New Microsoft Tech.. hello 9V
Next: OOPIC Compiler Question

From: Muzza on 9 Jul 2010 12:48

On Jul 10, 12:42 am, "cbarn24...(a)aol.com" <cbarn24...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 11:13 am, Muzza <vanlu...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 9, 3:24 am, "cbarn24...(a)aol.com" <cbarn24...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 7, 1:40 pm, "Murray R. Van Luyn" <REMOVE.vanlu...(a)iinet.net.au>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > <cbarn24...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:96241fde-0d12-4aee-a970-038ea36aaf9e(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Jul 5, 5:19 pm, d_s_klein <d_s_kl...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 4, 6:12 pm, "Murray R. Van Luyn" <REMOVE.vanlu...(a)iinet.net.au>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > > Into 8051 derived controllers and coding with Keil C51? Save countless
> > > > > > development hours by basing your applications on my proven,
> > > > > > user-friendly
> > > > > > foundation Keil C source code modules. Find them here:
>
> > > > > >http://members.iinet.net.au/~vanluynm/
>
> > > > > > Please take advantage of the site's safe bookmarking mechanism and come
> > > > > > back
> > > > > > often. New content is currently being added on a very regular basis.
>
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Murray R. Van Luyn.
>
> > > > > There is a commercial site (pay me to download my software) at the end
> > > > > of that link - your post is the textbook definition of SPAM.
>
> > > > > For the rest of the world, there is better software out there FOR
> > > > > FREE!
>
> > > > > RK
>
> > > > Very true, I had a quick look at the serial module and it's joke code.
> > > > Has no value whatever.
>
> > > > Isn't it odd that such empty criticism always comes from anonymous, with no
> > > > worthy contribution of their own?
>
> > > Nothing anonymous about me squire, if you cant email me its because
> > > your hiding behind an anonymous address yourself. Try using the
> > > address your isp gave you.
>
> > > I think my contribution was posative, aside from maybe saving someone
> > > time and money it should have spurned you on to look again at your
> > > effort. Sadly it looks like one out of two.
>
> > > > Okay cbarn24050, please feel free to impress us all with your own
> > > > significant and worthwhile contributions to the embedded community.
>
> > > Well what would impress you?
>
> > > > Can't do it? Why ever not, I wonder?
>
> > > Can do have done, and yourself?
>
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Murray R. Van Luyn.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > hahahaha.
>
> > Scurry away little cockroach. The light might shine on you!
>
> I hope some light shone on you from your post 2 days ago, man your
> some expert!!
>
> http://www.8052.com/forum/read/176494
>
>
>
>
>
> > Regards,
> > Murray R. Van Luyn.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Usenut!

From: Walter Banks on 9 Jul 2010 13:06

Muzza wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 12:14 am, Muzza <vanlu...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote:
> > On Jul 9, 11:31 pm, Walter Banks <wal...(a)bytecraft.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Muzza wrote:
> > > > I can assure you that I am on very solid ground with all 3 companies
> > > > whose products I link to, promote or feature on my website
> >
> > > Does that mean you are using Keil's logo with ARM's permission?
> >
> > > w..
> >
> > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net ---
> >
> > Hi Walter,
> >
> > No. My usage agreement predates whatever structural re-organization
> > that involved ARM with Keil. As far as I'm currently aware, I'm not
> > the least bit exposed. You're welcome to raise it with whom ever,
> > should you wish.
> >
> > I'm not particularly attached to the Keil C51 logo, as it's display
> > does nothing for my non-business cause. How this is of anyone else's
> > business, though, is a total mystery to me.
> >
> > I have noted a sad tendency for some community members to childishly
> > indulge in licence and permission badgering. I've observed that it
> > happens quite a lot. You'll have a devil of a job convincing me that
> > Chris' motivation concerns anything other than throwing his (light)
> > weight around. I suppose it makes him feel powerful to intimidate
> > others, but I can't really see the point of it myself.
> >
> > Thanks for your welcome interest, Walter. I hope that I've managed to
> > satisfy your concerns.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Murray R. Van Luyn.
>
> Walter,
>
> Nah, on second thoughts Walter, your interest isn't all that welcome.
> You're no better than bully-boy Chris, and your motivation is just as
> self-indulgent. What I do and don't do is none of your business.

Business ethics in embedded systems is very much my business.
Un-ethical behavior adversely affects anyone who is involved
competitors and partners. Keil's name is being used to promote
products. Your newsgroup behavior here reflects on Keil.

w..

w..

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---

From: Chris H on 9 Jul 2010 14:37

In message <3236caf2-5e0a-4b33-9d08-a2252256a6cc(a)x24g2000pro.googlegroup
s.com>, Muzza <vanluynm(a)iinet.net.au> writes
>On Jul 9, 11:31�pm, Walter Banks <wal...(a)bytecraft.com> wrote:
>> Muzza wrote:
>> > I can assure you that I am on very solid ground with all 3 companies
>> > whose products I link to, promote or feature on my website
>>
>> Does that mean you are using Keil's logo with ARM's permission?
>>
>> w..
>>
>> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net ---
>
>Hi Walter,
>
>No. My usage agreement predates whatever structural re-organization
>that involved ARM with Keil.

Arm own Keil... as the logo on your web site says Keil an ARM company.
Or did do until you blanked the web site

> As far as I'm currently aware, I'm not
>the least bit exposed.

Then you are in for a surprise.... Unless you have already had one
seeing as your web site now appears to be closed down

>I'm not particularly attached to the Keil C51 logo, as it's display
>does nothing for my non-business cause. How this is of anyone else's
>business, though, is a total mystery to me.

It is probably of interest to ARM, Keil and anyone associated with them.

>I have noted a sad tendency for some community members to childishly
>indulge in licence and permission badgering. I've observed that it
>happens quite a lot.

Yes it does ... pages of legalese that were on your web site

> You'll have a devil of a job convincing me that
>Chris' motivation concerns anything other than throwing his (light)
>weight around.

:-) Clearly he does not know me.

--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

From: Chris H on 9 Jul 2010 14:38

In message <74285e7a-80c3-4037-8997-db354a452279(a)y32g2000prc.googlegroup
s.com>, Muzza <vanluynm(a)iinet.net.au> writes
>
>Walter,
>
>Nah, on second thoughts Walter, your interest isn't all that welcome.
>You're no better than bully-boy Chris, and your motivation is just as
>self-indulgent. What I do and don't do is none of your business.

Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.......

--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

From: Muzza on 9 Jul 2010 17:59

First | Prev | Next | Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: New Microsoft Tech.. hello 9V
Next: OOPIC Compiler Question