From: * US on
Even more of the facts the bushworshipper can't dispute:

http://www.911sharethetruth.com/links.htm

http://911sharethetruth.com/911dollars.htm

On Mon, 17 May 2010 05:12:21 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> I am a bushkultie who is so gullible as to believe
> Bush and Cheney will pay me for my counter-disinfo work
> for them.
>...have failed...lies
>...loyalty to Bush is not to be questioned.

It's not about you, though.

It's about how your masters are traitors.
From: * US on
One would think that those massive tower cores
would have resisted the downward falls for at
least an instant.

That's if one did the thinking.

On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>... can only reply with weak insults ...

That's because you can't dispute the facts
presented to you.



On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>... smoking crack...

You sure do have problems, there.

On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:15:49 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>...All debunked ...

Prove it.

Oh, that's right, you can't.

"full peer review"

http://www.journalof911studies.com/

The neocon pawn doesn't understand
even those three words.

The neocon pawn isn't qualified as a
"peer", obviously.

He can't even find any specifics.
From: * US on
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>... word that means nothing...

You don't get the meaning of any of the words.

Three words that mean nothing to the bushkultie,
but plenty to those still free to think clearly:

"full peer review"

http://www.journalof911studies.com/
From: * US on
From the link, also undisputed:

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>... word that means nothing...

You don't get the meaning of any of the words.

Three words that mean nothing to the bushkultie,
but plenty to those still free to think clearly:

"full peer review"

http://www.journalof911studies.com/
From: * US on
From the link, also undisputed:

"countering several popular myths about the WTC collapses"

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

The neocon pawn believes the myths.

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>... word that means nothing...

You don't get the meaning of any of the words.

Three words that mean nothing to the bushkultie,
but plenty to those still free to think clearly:

"full peer review"

http://www.journalof911studies.com/