From: * US on
The bushkultie hasn't disputed the laws of physics,
especially not by namecalling and chestthumping.

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT), Bushkultie Kook Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>... the "content" is...

It's the laws of physics. You've never heard of them, have you.

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:19:05 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>...those contents...

You haven't read them, have you.

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:27:18 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote:

>* US * wrote:
>
>> http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml
>
> That's some very clear and irrefutable logic and hard
>evidence. To believe that the upper portion of the towers
>(the lightest, thinnest, and weakest portion of the steel
>frame) could crush its way through the massive undamaged,
>much thicker, stronger, steel frame below it at all, let
>alone anything even close to free fall, is a form of insanity.
>Yet that's precisely what followers of the government's
>impossible cave man conspiracy theory believe. No wonder they
>*never* address the facts, expert research, and hard evidence.....

Indeed.

Notice how nobody can actually dispute the content.

It can't be done.
From: * US on
The bushworshipper has to pretend that PNAC
didn't express a desire for an attack on the USA
at all, much less in writing on the web.

Here's another item that the neocon pawn can't address:

On Thu, 20 May 2010 05:21:09 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>...criminals ...

Why do you believe they'd hesitate to cause a "New Pearl Harbor" or "Reichstag Fire"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Pearl_Harbor
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/nc-pilger.html

No answer?

Still no answer?
From: Road Glidin' Don on
On Jun 23, 8:23 am, * US * wrote:

Get a life.


From: Road Glidin' Don on
On Jun 23, 8:20 am, * US * wrote:

Get a life.


From: Road Glidin' Don on
On Jun 23, 8:19 am, * US * wrote:

Get a life.