9-11 Truth makes HUGE showing at Los Angeles Peace March as bushkultie Iarndud Crackwhore Kook for War screeches in helpless rage
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Martian meteorite ALH84001 contains fossilized trace of collagen fibril
Next: Wanted: A mathematical definition for consonant...
From: * US on 6 Jun 2010 07:17 Three words that mean nothing to the bushkultie, but plenty to those still free to think clearly: "full peer review" http://www.journalof911studies.com/
From: * US on 6 Jun 2010 07:27 On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:19:48 -0400, "Vito" <vito(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: >Iarnrod wrote: >> ..... If you had a brain >> and stopped smoking crack, you would have realized this by now. >> >Give up. It is clear to everybody that you lost the debate when you >couldn't refute anything and had to fall back on personal attacks - the sure >sign of a loser. True. One would think that those massive tower cores would have resisted the downward falls for at least an instant. That's if one did the requisite thinking. On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... can only reply with weak insults ... That's because you can't dispute the facts presented to you. On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... smoking crack... You sure do have problems, there. On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:15:49 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >...All debunked ... Prove it. Oh, that's right, you can't. "full peer review" http://www.journalof911studies.com/ The neocon pawn doesn't understand even those three words. The neocon pawn isn't qualified as a "peer", obviously. He can't even find any specifics.
From: * US on 6 Jun 2010 07:27 On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:46:35 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... kicking a poor mental deficient... Hope you're kept away from the other patients. >I have no mercy Especially not on 9/11 victims. >stupidity.� Bush and Cheney duped you easily enough. >Nope, it's called the gloating stage ... You're so glad that the 9/11 perps are still cashing in on those crimes. One would think that those massive tower cores would have resisted the downward falls for at least an instant. That's if one did the thinking. On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... can only reply with weak insults ... That's because you can't dispute the facts presented to you. On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... smoking crack... You sure do have problems, there. On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:15:49 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >...All debunked ... Prove it. Oh, that's right, you can't. "full peer review" http://www.journalof911studies.com/ The neocon pawn doesn't understand even those three words. The neocon pawn isn't qualified as a "peer", obviously. He can't even find any specifics.
From: * US on 6 Jun 2010 07:27 The bushworshipper has to pretend that PNAC didn't express a desire for an attack on the USA at all, much less in writing on the web. Here's another item that the neocon pawn can't address: On Thu, 20 May 2010 05:21:09 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >...criminals ... Why do you believe they'd hesitate to cause a "New Pearl Harbor" or "Reichstag Fire"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Pearl_Harbor http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/nc-pilger.html No answer?
From: * US on 6 Jun 2010 07:47
The bushkultie hasn't disputed the laws of physics, especially not by namecalling and chestthumping. On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT), Bushkultie Kook Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... the "content" is... It's the laws of physics. You've never heard of them, have you. On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:19:05 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >...those contents... You haven't read them, have you. On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:27:18 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >* US * wrote: > >> http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml > > That's some very clear and irrefutable logic and hard >evidence. To believe that the upper portion of the towers >(the lightest, thinnest, and weakest portion of the steel >frame) could crush its way through the massive undamaged, >much thicker, stronger, steel frame below it at all, let >alone anything even close to free fall, is a form of insanity. >Yet that's precisely what followers of the government's >impossible cave man conspiracy theory believe. No wonder they >*never* address the facts, expert research, and hard evidence..... Indeed. Notice how nobody can actually dispute the content. |