911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 22 Sep 2009 16:44 In news:h9b3gh$t6h$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: > >> Right. "HITS" The WTC towers didn't fall due to the HITS. They >> fell due to the fires from which structural steel is >> supposed to be insulated. > > The fire didn't affect 80,00 tons of cold hard steel below the > fires. How do you imagine it suddenly lost all its strength and > produced no more resistance to falling debris than air? Lots and lots of heavy stuff above it fell onto it.
From: AllYou! on 22 Sep 2009 16:45 In news:h9b3l1$t6h$3(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > Al Dykes wrote: > >> Henry Guthard, engineer and one of Yamasaki's [WTC designer] >> original partners who also worked as the project manager at >> the [WTC] site, said, "To hit the building, to disappear, to >> have pieces come out the other side, it was amazing the >> building stood. To defend against 5,000 (sic) gallons of >> ignited fuel in a building of 1350 feet is just not possible. > > Most of the fuel burned off in minutes. That's not enough time > to significantly weaken the steel. Steel weakens immediately as it starts to warm. Look it up.
From: AllYou! on 22 Sep 2009 16:51 In news:h9b3sj$t6h$4(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > Iarnrod wrote: > >> All of the evidence supports the official findings. > > You've confused the word "support" with "contradict". > > Tell us why you "think" Cheney would permit a known > hijacked plane to enter the most heavy guarded airspace > on the planet almost an hour after the first tower was hit. By your standard of what a whacko is, you'd have to provide "hard evidence" that Cheney ordered any stand down wrt any such plane.
From: AllYou! on 22 Sep 2009 16:54 In news:h9b77b$740$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > Please explain the violent 75 foot explosions seen > coming out the sides of both towers hundred of feet > below the "collapse" zone. Even a school kid who's ever stomped his foot really fast onto an empty carton of milk knows the answer to that one.
From: AllYou! on 22 Sep 2009 16:56
In news:h9b7lt$99g$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > The deluded conspiracy theorist cited by Dykes blamed > the explosive disintegration of the towers on jet fuel. Yeah. If it wasn't for the jet fuel that ignited theereby setting off the other fires, the steel would never have heated to then weaken enough to fail. |