911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: Al Dykes on 24 Sep 2009 10:58 In article <h9fnif$g5f$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >AllYou! imagined: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> articulated: > >>> Obviously. The towers didn't "fall" at all. They quite >>> literally exploded and disintegrated in a matter of >>> seconds. Why do you refuse to read, think, view the >>> evidence or study the expert research? Mindlessly parroting >>> government lies and propagandas makes you look extremely >>> foolish and gullible. > >> Those two factors then combined to heat the steel bar joists >> to the point where it could not be disappated as it would if >> the fires were isolated, > > Why do you refuse to read, think or study the evidence? >The fires were isolated. Not only were they oxygen starved Henry hasn't learned any fact about WTC in 8 years. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 24 Sep 2009 12:01 On Sep 24, 5:50 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > Innews:h9fp3n$i8r$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > > AllYou! wrote: > >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > >> Also, molten aluminum appears silvery, not bright > >>> red/orange/yellow. > > >> :-) Cold aluminum appears silvery. Molten aluminum, just like > >> most metals, turns red, then orange, then white. > > > So many stupid, easily debunked conspiracy kook lies > > - so little time.... > > >http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Molten_Aluminum_Pour... > > So now, it's your claim that you know that the molten metal was not > aluminum, or any other soft metal, because you have hard evidence > that it was silver, and that it was poured onto rusty steel? Please > provide the hard evidence for those assertions about the specific > conditions at the WTC site. > > And while you're at it, and as I've asked you many times in the > past, please provide har evidence for how any modern controlled > demolition has ever resulted in "pools of motlen metal flowing like > a river". Either you can do that, or you cannot. > > >http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/f/Glowing-Aluminum-Disinfo... > > As those pictures show, when alluminum gets hot enough to flow, it > gets white, not silvery. So why would you provide hard evidence > that provess your assertions to be totally bogus? > > How long do you think those charges, and all the associated > wiring, could be kept hidden from all of the maintenance and > construction people who regularly service the mechanicals in those > areas? > And how many such explosive charges would be required to do the job? > And how much wiring would be required? > And how would you connect all of those wires from all of the > different floors just though the ceilings? > And how would those explosives cause the columns to buckle inward, > especially if the lateral bar joists as not also demolished? > And why would the only buckling happen right at where the planes > creased? > And how many people would be required to design, plan, and execute > such an installation, and what are the chances that all of them, ALL > of them, keep the mouths shut? Unlimited black-ops funding. Computers. Wireless detonators. Advanced incendiaries from military applications. 40 or 50 "cutouts" which are long dead. A controlled media. Ignorant public.
From: Al Dykes on 24 Sep 2009 12:16 In article <736b930d-035f-41b2-a3c7-69a81178cdf2(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sep 24, 5:50=A0am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> Innews:h9fp3n$i8r$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >> > AllYou! wrote: >> >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >> >> =A0Also, molten aluminum appears silvery, not bright >> >>> red/orange/yellow. >> >> >> :-) =A0 Cold aluminum appears silvery. =A0Molten aluminum, just like >> >> most metals, turns red, then orange, then white. >> >> > =A0So many stupid, easily debunked conspiracy kook lies >> > - so little time.... >> >> >http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Molten_Aluminum_Pour... >> >> So now, it's your claim that you know that the molten metal was not >> aluminum, or any other soft metal, because you have hard evidence >> that it was silver, and that it was poured onto rusty steel? =A0Please >> provide the hard evidence for those assertions about the specific >> conditions at the WTC site. >> >> And while you're at it, and as I've asked you many times in the >> past, please provide har evidence for how any modern controlled >> demolition has ever resulted in "pools of motlen metal flowing like >> a river". =A0Either you can do that, or you cannot. >> >> >http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/f/Glowing-Aluminum-Disinfo... >> >> As those pictures show, when alluminum gets hot enough to flow, it >> gets white, not silvery. =A0So why would you provide hard evidence >> that provess your assertions to be totally bogus? >> >> How long do you think those charges, and all the associated >> wiring, could be kept hidden from all of the maintenance and >> construction people who regularly service the mechanicals in those >> areas? >> And how many such explosive charges would be required to do the job? >> And how much wiring would be required? >> And how would you connect all of those wires from all of the >> different floors just though the ceilings? >> And how would those explosives cause the columns to buckle inward, >> especially if the lateral bar joists as not also demolished? >> And why would the only buckling happen right at where the planes >> creased? >> And how many people would be required to design, plan, and execute >> such an installation, and what are the chances that all of them, ALL >> of them, keep the mouths shut? > >Unlimited black-ops funding. >Computers. >Wireless detonators. "Wireless detonators" ???? The antennas on the north tower had multiple 50,000 wat signals. The US Army demolition manual has a chart that says to stay 3,000 meters away from a single 50Kw transmitter. The entire WTC site was within 4,000 meters of that antenna. Table 6-1 Safe distances for blasting near radio transmitters. 50KW - 3,000 meters. FM 5-250 Explosives & Demolition http://www.militarynewbie.com/pubs/FM%205-250%20Explosives%20And%20Demolitions%20Manual.pd\ f Example A-5 plate 14 inches wide, 1 inch thick - 3 packages C4 Example A-7 7 blocks of C4 needed to cut a 7 inch dia bar. Page 165 C4 20 cubin inches -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 24 Sep 2009 12:33 On Sep 24, 9:16 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <736b930d-035f-41b2-a3c7-69a81178c...(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Sep 24, 5:50=A0am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> Innews:h9fp3n$i8r$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > >> > AllYou! wrote: > >> >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > >> >> =A0Also, molten aluminum appears silvery, not bright > >> >>> red/orange/yellow. > > >> >> :-) =A0 Cold aluminum appears silvery. =A0Molten aluminum, just like > >> >> most metals, turns red, then orange, then white. > > >> > =A0So many stupid, easily debunked conspiracy kook lies > >> > - so little time.... > > >> >http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Molten_Aluminum_Pour.... > > >> So now, it's your claim that you know that the molten metal was not > >> aluminum, or any other soft metal, because you have hard evidence > >> that it was silver, and that it was poured onto rusty steel? =A0Please > >> provide the hard evidence for those assertions about the specific > >> conditions at the WTC site. > > >> And while you're at it, and as I've asked you many times in the > >> past, please provide har evidence for how any modern controlled > >> demolition has ever resulted in "pools of motlen metal flowing like > >> a river". =A0Either you can do that, or you cannot. > > >> >http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/f/Glowing-Aluminum-Disinfo.... > > >> As those pictures show, when alluminum gets hot enough to flow, it > >> gets white, not silvery. =A0So why would you provide hard evidence > >> that provess your assertions to be totally bogus? > > >> How long do you think those charges, and all the associated > >> wiring, could be kept hidden from all of the maintenance and > >> construction people who regularly service the mechanicals in those > >> areas? > >> And how many such explosive charges would be required to do the job? > >> And how much wiring would be required? > >> And how would you connect all of those wires from all of the > >> different floors just though the ceilings? > >> And how would those explosives cause the columns to buckle inward, > >> especially if the lateral bar joists as not also demolished? > >> And why would the only buckling happen right at where the planes > >> creased? > >> And how many people would be required to design, plan, and execute > >> such an installation, and what are the chances that all of them, ALL > >> of them, keep the mouths shut? > > >Unlimited black-ops funding. > >Computers. > >Wireless detonators. > > "Wireless detonators" ???? > > The antennas on the north tower had multiple 50,000 wat signals. The > US Army demolition manual has a chart that says to stay 3,000 meters > away from a single 50Kw transmitter. The entire WTC site was within > 4,000 meters of that antenna. > > Table 6-1 Safe distances for blasting near radio transmitters. > 50KW - 3,000 meters. > > FM 5-250 Explosives & Demolition > http://www.militarynewbie.com/pubs/FM%205-250%20Explosives%20And%20De.... > f > > Example A-5 plate 14 inches wide, 1 inch thick - 3 packages C4 > Example A-7 7 blocks of C4 needed to cut a 7 inch dia bar. Page 165 > > C4 20 cubin inches > So the military now publishes all their details of every weapon and all their top secret technology for all the world to see? Sure.....
From: Al Dykes on 24 Sep 2009 12:39
In article <f27dd324-ae74-4626-a21f-2967d8de766d(a)f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sep 24, 9:16=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <736b930d-035f-41b2-a3c7-69a81178c...(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.= >com>, >> >> >> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Sep 24, 5:50=3DA0am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >> Innews:h9fp3n$i8r$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >> >> > AllYou! wrote: >> >> >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >> >> >> =3DA0Also, molten aluminum appears silvery, not bright >> >> >>> red/orange/yellow. >> >> >> >> :-) =3DA0 Cold aluminum appears silvery. =3DA0Molten aluminum, just= > like >> >> >> most metals, turns red, then orange, then white. >> >> >> > =3DA0So many stupid, easily debunked conspiracy kook lies >> >> > - so little time.... >> >> >> >http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Molten_Aluminum_Pour= >... >> >> >> So now, it's your claim that you know that the molten metal was not >> >> aluminum, or any other soft metal, because you have hard evidence >> >> that it was silver, and that it was poured onto rusty steel? =3DA0Plea= >se >> >> provide the hard evidence for those assertions about the specific >> >> conditions at the WTC site. >> >> >> And while you're at it, and as I've asked you many times in the >> >> past, please provide har evidence for how any modern controlled >> >> demolition has ever resulted in "pools of motlen metal flowing like >> >> a river". =3DA0Either you can do that, or you cannot. >> >> >> >http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/f/Glowing-Aluminum-Disinfo= >... >> >> >> As those pictures show, when alluminum gets hot enough to flow, it >> >> gets white, not silvery. =3DA0So why would you provide hard evidence >> >> that provess your assertions to be totally bogus? >> >> >> How long do you think those charges, and all the associated >> >> wiring, could be kept hidden from all of the maintenance and >> >> construction people who regularly service the mechanicals in those >> >> areas? >> >> And how many such explosive charges would be required to do the job? >> >> And how much wiring would be required? >> >> And how would you connect all of those wires from all of the >> >> different floors just though the ceilings? >> >> And how would those explosives cause the columns to buckle inward, >> >> especially if the lateral bar joists as not also demolished? >> >> And why would the only buckling happen right at where the planes >> >> creased? >> >> And how many people would be required to design, plan, and execute >> >> such an installation, and what are the chances that all of them, ALL >> >> of them, keep the mouths shut? >> >> >Unlimited black-ops funding. >> >Computers. >> >Wireless detonators. >> >> =A0 =A0"Wireless detonators" ???? >> >> The antennas on the north tower had multiple 50,000 wat signals. The >> US Army demolition manual has a chart that says to stay 3,000 meters >> away from a single 50Kw transmitter. =A0The entire WTC site was within >> 4,000 meters of that antenna. >> >> =A0 Table 6-1 Safe distances for blasting near radio transmitters. >> =A0 50KW - 3,000 meters. >> >> =A0 FM 5-250 Explosives & Demolition >> =A0http://www.militarynewbie.com/pubs/FM%205-250%20Explosives%20And%20De.= >.. >> f >> >> =A0 Example A-5 =A0 plate 14 inches wide, 1 inch thick =A0- 3 packages C4 >> =A0 Example A-7 =A07 =A0blocks of C4 needed to cut a 7 inch dia bar. =A0 = >Page 165 >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0C4 20 cubin inches >> > >So the military now publishes all their details of every weapon and >all their top secret technology for all the world to see? >Sure..... No, just demolition explosives. Hint: Radio induction works the same for the Army as it does for civilians. The same material has been available as the "Dupont Blasters Handbook" for decades. I read in in th library ages ago. You can buy in on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Blasters-Handbook-17ED-Robert-Hopler/dp/1892396009 Everything you believe about 9/11 is wrong. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail |