911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: Iarnrod on 22 Sep 2009 17:09 On Sep 22, 2:10 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Sep 22, 10:40 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > > paulthomascpa wrote: > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote > > >> Why don't you read the article > > > I don't read comic books. > > > FEMA is a comic book? Your magic fire/cave man cartoon > > conspiracy is certainly comical. > > > http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AppendixC-fema403_apc.pdf > > > -- > > > http://911research.wtc7.net > > http://www.journalof911studies.com/ > > http://www.ae911truth.org > > Note: FEMA points it's finger at everything but the possibility of > accelerants, ie thermite. Use of thermite in these collapses is a physical impossibility. Thermite does not do what was done to those buildings. That's plainly ridiculous. > This is in direct contradiction to crime scene investigation. Wrong. There was no evidence of thermite, just as there was no evidence of sonic beams from outer space.
From: knews4u2chew on 22 Sep 2009 19:32 On Sep 22, 1:56 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > Innews:h9b7lt$99g$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > > The deluded conspiracy theorist cited by Dykes blamed > > the explosive disintegration of the towers on jet fuel. > > Yeah. If it wasn't for the jet fuel that ignited theereby setting > off the other fires, the steel would never have heated to then > weaken enough to fail. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm
From: The Terminator on 22 Sep 2009 19:46 On Sep 22, 6:32 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Sep 22, 1:56 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > Innews:h9b7lt$99g$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > > > The deluded conspiracy theorist cited by Dykes blamed > > > the explosive disintegration of the towers on jet fuel. > > > Yeah. If it wasn't for the jet fuel that ignited theereby setting > > off the other fires, the steel would never have heated to then > > weaken enough to fail. > "knews" - you one wacko conspiracy nut for sure ! http://www.911myths.com/ http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths http://www.debunk911myths.org/ http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/ http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/... http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory http://www.carpenoctem.tv/cons/
From: Al Dykes on 22 Sep 2009 19:56 In article <1a6df0f5-5cd5-45cf-b96a-6711d335b8cd(a)m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sep 22, 1:56=A0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> Innews:h9b7lt$99g$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >> > =A0The deluded conspiracy theorist cited by Dykes blamed >> > the explosive disintegration of the towers on jet fuel. >> >> Yeah. =A0If it wasn't for the jet fuel that ignited theereby setting >> off the other fires, the steel would never have heated to then >> weaken enough to fail. > >http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm >http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm >http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm >http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm A quick look at that page shows a major error that makes all the rest of the artihmetic wrong. Each story had a floor slab and a ceiling slab. These slabs were 207 feet wide, 207 feet deep and 4 (in parts 5) inches thick and were constructed from lightweight concrete. So each slab contained 207 x 207 x 1/3 = 14,283 cubic feet of concrete. Now a cubic foot of lightweight concrete weighs about 50kg, hence each slab weighed 714,150 . 700,000 kgs. Together, the floor and ceiling slabs weighed some 1,400,000 kgs. Wrong! Each slab was the ceiling of one floor and the floor of the lower level. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: Iarnrod on 23 Sep 2009 00:10
On Sep 22, 5:32 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Sep 22, 1:56 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > > Innews:h9b7lt$99g$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > > > The deluded conspiracy theorist cited by Dykes blamed > > > the explosive disintegration of the towers on jet fuel. > > > Yeah. If it wasn't for the jet fuel that ignited theereby setting > > off the other fires, the steel would never have heated to then > > weaken enough to fail. > > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htmhttp://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htmhttp://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htmhttp://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm Are you thinking that if you repeat your lies often enough, they won't still be lies? |