From: AllYou! on
In news:hb21ca$9b6$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu,
Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused:
> AllYou! wrote:
>> knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>
>>> WTC 7 was gutted from inside and fell into itself in near
>>> perfect symmetry at near free fall speed.
>
>> It did fall rather symmetrically, but not only did it not fall
>> at free-fall speed,
>
> Your conspiracy kook lies certainly are stupid, blatant,

Congratulations! Whacko standard acheived.


From: Iarnrod on
On Oct 13, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Iarnrod wrote:
> > There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story
> > upper block sideways that far.
>
>   Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South
> Tower.

I'd have to have some of the hallucinogens you use, Self-Admitted
Fired Janitor, in order to see something that is not actually present.
<chuckle>

Let us know when you have something that actually supports any one of
your rightard fantasies, Hankie.
From: Iarnrod on
On Oct 13, 8:49 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Iarnrod wrote:
> > On Oct 13, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >>  The demolitions shown in the video below both display all
> >> the  characteristics of controlled demolition,
> >> Nope, none of them does.
>
>   <link restored because we can't afford to let freedom,
> justice, truth, and America hating extremists or nut jobs
> hide the truth and facts>

Link deleted because it does not show anything like your delusional
mind claims, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor.

>   So, in your "mind" the video on the right showing a known
> demolition doesn't display any of the characteristics of a
> demolition, eh?

The WTC7 was a progressive structural collapse and had NONE of the
characteristics of a controlled demolition starting with the proven
fact that there were no controlled demolition charges,

>   Ironhead, I'm really pleased that you and Dykes are here to
> *solidly* confirm the insanity of ....

,,, of you.

> clueless parrots of the Bush
> regime's cartoon fairy tale.

You are a Bush useful idiot, Hankie, by serving his interests and
being the delusional insane so-called "opposition" that being insane,
taints the true opposition to his criminal regime.

>   It's been clear for years that magic fire/Super Arab conspiracy
> theorists are very poorly informed, not very intelligent and
> extremely gullible,

Projection. The official findings have been proven and are fully
supported by all physics, facts, evidence, witnesses, et al. OTOH,
none of your claims are actually supported by any evidence at all.

From: Al Dykes on
In article <hb21ca$9b6$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>,
Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote:
>AllYou! wrote:
>> knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>
>>> WTC 7 was gutted from inside and fell into itself in near perfect
>>> symmetry at near free fall speed.
>
>> It did fall rather symmetrically, but not only did it not fall at
>> free-fall speed,
>
> Your conspiracy kook lies certainly are stupid, blatant, and
>easily exposed. Thanks to the efforts of 9-11 Truth experts,
>even NIST has finally been forced to admit that WTC7 did in
>fact drop at free fall speed,.


You've been lied to.

NIST never said WTC7 fell at literal free-fall speed. Not even close.




--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

From: Al Dykes on
In article <hb21g6$9b6$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>,
Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote:
>Iarnrod wrote:
>
>> There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story
>> upper block sideways that far.
>
>
>
> Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South
>Tower.
>
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp4.html
>


So what? There was no man-made demolition at WTC.


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail