911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: Michael Moroney on 13 Oct 2009 23:23 knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com writes: >If a building explodes into dust an no one hears it does it make any >sound? Well, certainly nobody heard any explosions that could be cause by controlled demolitions, so, barring any Wile E. Coyote physics, we can certainly rule them out since there were plenty of people to hear them if they existed.
From: Michael Moroney on 13 Oct 2009 23:42 knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com writes: >> >How does toppling top section fall into the most resistant part of >> >> Gravity works that way. >> >Liar. >Gravity follows the "path of least resistance" according to the Laws >of Physics and the Laws of Conservation of Angular Moment. Man, you kooktards are deluded. If I hold a ball over a table outdoors and drop it, do you believe the ball will go flying up rather than down, because there's nothing above it but a table in the "down" direction, so "up" is the path of least resistance? >The core offered the MOST RESISTANCE. Which is why it remained standing for a few seconds after the outer part of the towers collapsed.
From: Michael Moroney on 14 Oct 2009 00:00 knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com writes: >On Oct 13, 9:18=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> You've been lied to. >> >We know. What you don't know is who's doing the lying. It's people like Steven Jones and the people behind all the 911 kookpages that are lying to you.
From: knews4u2chew on 14 Oct 2009 02:26 On Oct 13, 7:36 am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Oct 13, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > > Iarnrod wrote: > > > There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story > > > upper block sideways that far. > > > Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South > > Tower. > > I'd have to have some of the hallucinogens you use, Self-Admitted > Fired Janitor, in order to see something that is not actually present. > <chuckle> > > Let us know when you have something that actually supports any one of > your rightard fantasies, Hankie. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516#
From: AllYou! on 14 Oct 2009 09:48
In news:36ae6173-8f63-48c3-ae59-2e64042c7210(a)i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com, Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> mused: > The WTC7 was a progressive structural collapse and had NONE of > the characteristics of a controlled demolition starting with the > proven fact that there were no controlled demolition charges, That's not true. WTC7 and all other controlled demoltions but result is stuff falling to the gound somehow or other. So I guess the whackos have THAT going for them. |