911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: knews4u2chew on 13 Oct 2009 14:24 On Oct 6, 1:08 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > Innews:hag4m7$aig$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > > Al Dykes wrote: > > >> There was no man-made demolition at WTC on 9/11. > > > So, all the videos showing exactly that are faked, eh? > > The videos don't show your fantasy of what actually happened. They > show what actually happened. So how does the debrise from the "falling" building shoot up, out, and throw steel beams 600 feet away? Why is the dust exploding upward and outward? Is that how debrise "falls with gravity?" Why are there no "pancakes?" Where are the estimated 3000 file cabinets? Why didn't all the paper burn in the "inferno?" Why does the dusted building look like a mushroom cloud? Who named it "ground zero?" Hiding in plain sight? How is it that near every beam was left in a nice portable size of 30-60 feet to haul away? Why wasn't there sections of the building hundreds of feet long from a building near a 1/4 mile tall? How did 47 core columns tied together with cross members turn into "pick-up sticks?" How did all those welds and bolts fail at once? Where did the energy come from to break nearly all the cement into micron sized dust? "The biggest piece of anything I found was 1/2 a telephone keypad. Two 110 story buildings andyou don't find a chair, a desk, a computer." What turned human beings into 500-1/2" sized pieces and hurled them across the street onto the Duetchbank building? I don't really expect you to anawer because all you know is SpookSpeak. (R)
From: Al Dykes on 13 Oct 2009 14:28 In article <5a966551-b3ca-4131-ad75-c5e08f4f550f(a)b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 13, 7:36=A0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Oct 13, 8:05=A0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> >> > Iarnrod wrote: >> > > There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story >> > > upper block sideways that far. >> >> > =A0 Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South >> > Tower. >> >> I'd have to have some of the hallucinogens you use, > >So you didn't see the top of tower 2 break, start to fall to one side, >then didappear into a dust cloud? >Get your seeing eye dog to help you. > >>Self-Admitted >> Fired Janitor, in order to see something that is not actually present. >> <chuckle> >> >Janitors know a lot about buildings. >Spooks on the other hand only know how to lie and spew. >Why are you denying the reality right before your eyes? >Is someone holding a gun to your head? > >> Let us know when you have something that actually supports any one of >> your rightard fantasies, Hankie. > >How do 30 floors disintergate into dust in 3 seconds? You are looking at smoke and dust from the break-up of sheet rock and concrete. No steel "disintigrated". WTC was mostly steel. >How does toppling top section fall into the most resistant part of Gravity works that way. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 13 Oct 2009 14:29 On Oct 13, 9:19 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) used SpookSpeak(R) to wave off the truth and wrote: > In article <hb21g6$9b...(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>, > > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >Iarnrod wrote: > > >> There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story > >> upper block sideways that far. > > > Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South > >Tower. > > > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp4.html > > So what? There was no man-made demolition at WTC. > Your Spook arm waving is meaningless you know. "We didn't look for incendiaries because we know they aren't there." NIST If a building explodes into dust an no one hears it does it make any sound? > -- > Al Dykes (Spook)
From: Al Dykes on 13 Oct 2009 14:29 In article <756b5895-e150-450a-b4f8-e9091ffbab93(a)y28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 13, 7:59=A0am, Iarnrod (The Spook) <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Oct 13, 8:49=A0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> >> > Iarnrod wrote: >> > > On Oct 13, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> > >> =A0The demolitions shown in the video below both display all >> > >> the =A0characteristics of controlled demolition, >> > >> Nope, none of them does. >> >> > =A0 <link restored because we can't afford to let freedom, >> > justice, truth, and America hating extremists or nut jobs >> > hide the truth and facts> >> >> Link deleted because it does not show anything like your delusional >> mind claims, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor. >> >Spook Speak (R) rule #1. >"If you delete and ignore the evidence it doesn't exist." > >> > =A0 So, in your "mind" the video on the right showing a known >> > demolition doesn't display any of the characteristics of a >> > demolition, eh? >> >> The WTC7 was a progressive structural collapse and had NONE of the >> characteristics of a controlled demolition starting with the proven >> fact that there were no controlled demolition charges, >> >"See the Emperor's new clothes?" >www.ae911truth.org Why doesn't Gage or anyone else from ae811 speak in front of professional groups of structural engineers and explain in technical terms why a new investigation is called for? Why doesn't Gage speak anywhere where he doesn't control the Q&A microphone? Why does only Gage speak for an organization that claims to have hundreds of members. Why doesn't Gage speak at Ground Zero where hundreds of thousands of people witnessed what he lies about and where all the firemen he misquotes live and might show up. It could even be arraigned. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: Al Dykes on 13 Oct 2009 14:30
In article <926e559f-c710-4829-8d0a-c20b51eeffd5(a)d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 13, 9:19=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) used SpookSpeak(R) to >wave off the truth and wrote: >> In article <hb21g6$9b...(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>, >> >> Henry =A0<9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> >Iarnrod wrote: >> >> >> There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story >> >> upper block sideways that far. >> >> > =A0Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South >> >Tower. >> >> > =A0http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp4.html >> >> So what? There was no man-made demolition at WTC. >> >Your Spook arm waving is meaningless you know. >"We didn't look for incendiaries because we know they aren't there." >NIST And they were right. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail |