911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: Iarnrod on 13 Oct 2009 15:26 On Oct 13, 11:58 am, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Oct 13, 7:36 am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 13, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > > > Iarnrod wrote: > > > > There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story > > > > upper block sideways that far. > > > > Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South > > > Tower. > > > I'd have to have some of the hallucinogens you use, > > So you didn't see the top of tower 2 break, start to fall to one side, > then didappear into a dust cloud? Yes. Are you now disagreeing with yourself and your idiotic claim that it rotated, righted itself and disintegrated? Are you now agreeing with me that it collapsed and fell intact into the floors below, which broke apart under the superior force and continued irresistible collapse all the way to the ground? Why are you changing your story? Why do you change it to agree with me yet try to claim I am blind when you're now agreeing with me, knowsknothing? > >Self-Admitted > > Fired Janitor, in order to see something that is not actually present. > > <chuckle> > > Janitors know a lot about buildings. They know how to clean toilets. But they know nothing, like you, about how the buildings collapsed. > Spooks on the other hand only know how to lie and spew. So you admit you are a spook!! Got it! > Why are you denying the reality right before your eyes? Like what? You've abandoned your delusion about disintegrating and rotating and straightening now and you agree with me... the top broke, started to fall then our view of its continued fall was blocked by the immense smoke and dust cloud generated by the collapse. This is what I have been telling you all along, rightard. Why is it that when you agree with me finally, you pretend you've been saying this all along? > Is someone holding a gun to your head? Projection. > > Let us know when you have something that actually supports any one of > > your rightard fantasies, Hankie. > > How do 30 floors disintergate into dust in 3 seconds? They did not disintegrate. KKKooker rightard. Look at your own videos. The top block appears to fall INTACT at all times it remains visible before sinking into the dust cloud. INTACT. No disintegration. Care to get your seeing eye dog? > How does toppling top section fall into the most resistant part of > the structure ... That's what was below it. > while turning to dust from the bottom up? Umm, rightard, the "bottom" of the 30-story block is where the contact is being made and the crushing and energy being applied to the collapse. Why on Earth would you expect the TOP should have been disintegrating before it came into direct contact with the collapsing mass? You contradict yourself as well. You now admit the top was intact whereas before you said it all disintegrated into dust ... a delusional claim disproven by every single video.
From: Iarnrod on 13 Oct 2009 15:30 On Oct 13, 12:08 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > On Oct 13, 7:59 am, Iarnrod (The Spook) <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:> On Oct 13, 8:49 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > > > Iarnrod wrote: > > > > On Oct 13, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > > >> The demolitions shown in the video below both display all > > > >> the characteristics of controlled demolition, > > > >> Nope, none of them does. > > > > <link restored because we can't afford to let freedom, > > > justice, truth, and America hating extremists or nut jobs > > > hide the truth and facts> > > > Link deleted because it does not show anything like your delusional > > mind claims, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor. > > Spook Speak (R) rule #1. > "If you delete and ignore the evidence it doesn't exist." Kook rule #1: Delude yourself into "thinking" that if your betters snip your kookcite from the reply, it magically disappears from your own post!! BWAHAAAHAHAAA!!! > > > So, in your "mind" the video on the right showing a known > > > demolition doesn't display any of the characteristics of a > > > demolition, eh? > > > The WTC7 was a progressive structural collapse and had NONE of the > > characteristics of a controlled demolition starting with the proven > > fact that there were no controlled demolition charges, > > "See the Emperor's new clothes?"www.ae911truth.org All lies, of course. Not in dispute. You have FAILED to select ONE THING from that site that you can defend. > > > Ironhead, I'm really pleased that you and Dykes are here to > > > *solidly* confirm the insanity of .... > > > ,,, of you. > > > > clueless parrots of the Bush > > > regime's cartoon fairy tale. > > > You are a Bush useful idiot, Hankie, by serving his interests and > > being the delusional insane so-called "opposition" that being insane, > > taints the true opposition to his criminal regime. > > SpookSpeak (R) rule #2. > Convolute every thread to destroy any semblance of logical debate. You have no logic, you have no debate. You make assertions that are contradicted by the plain evidence. You make psychically impossible claims that have been thoroughly disproven. > Turn every statement around to mean the opposite of what was stated. You don't even know what you mean. You contradict yourself and reality in every post. > > > It's been clear for years that magic fire/Super Arab conspiracy > > > theorists are very poorly informed, not very intelligent and > > > extremely gullible, > > > Projection. The official findings have been proven and are fully > > supported by all physics, facts, evidence, witnesses, et al. OTOH, > > none of your claims are actually supported by any evidence at all. > > SpookSpeak rule #3. > Lie, lie, and lie gain and again. Kook rule #3: Lie while accusing the other side of lying. > Make every sentence a lie or convolution in order to distract from the > facts. > Don't under any circumstances provide cites to back up your lies so > you can change your lies later. I have thoroughly and completely backed up everything I have said and I have proven with FACTS and SCIENCE that everything you have claimed is wrong. What more do you want! > Liar. > And a paid liar at that. You are a paranoid delusional. > No one could tell such blatant lies for free. Yet there you are doing it!
From: knews4u2chew on 13 Oct 2009 15:31 On Oct 13, 11:28 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <5a966551-b3ca-4131-ad75-c5e08f4f5...(a)b25g2000prb.googlegroups..com>, > > > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Oct 13, 7:36=A0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 13, 8:05=A0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > >> > Iarnrod wrote: > >> > > There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story > >> > > upper block sideways that far. > > >> > =A0 Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South > >> > Tower. > > >> I'd have to have some of the hallucinogens you use, > > >So you didn't see the top of tower 2 break, start to fall to one side, > >then didappear into a dust cloud? > >Get your seeing eye dog to help you. > > >>Self-Admitted > >> Fired Janitor, in order to see something that is not actually present. > >> <chuckle> > > >Janitors know a lot about buildings. > >Spooks on the other hand only know how to lie and spew. > >Why are you denying the reality right before your eyes? > >Is someone holding a gun to your head? > > >> Let us know when you have something that actually supports any one of > >> your rightard fantasies, Hankie. > > >How do 30 floors disintergate into dust in 3 seconds? > > You are looking at smoke and dust from the break-up of sheet rock and > concrete. From what mechanism dust it turn to dust in micron sizes? Why does cement on steel decking turn to dust? Why did NIST drop their "pancake" theory? >No steel "disintigrated". WTC was mostly steel. > I didn't say it did (you put in your SpookSpeak) but experts have found the evidence that some did in the dust analysis. http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM > >How does toppling top section fall into the most resistant part of > > Gravity works that way. > Liar. Gravity follows the "path of least resistance" according to the Laws of Physics and the Laws of Conservation of Angular Moment. The core offered the MOST RESISTANCE. > -- > Al Dykes (Spook) Thanks for playing dumb for the crowd.
From: Iarnrod on 13 Oct 2009 15:45 On Oct 13, 1:13 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > Iarnrod wrote: > > On Oct 13, 10:56 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >> Al Dykes wrote: > >>> NIST never said WTC7 fell at literal free-fall speed. Not even close. > >> Your kook lies and ignorance sure are blatant and easily > >> exposed. Are you mentally ill? Rhetorical, BTW - look it up... > >>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15201 > > That's not NIST > > Learn how to read and think, nutjob. > > http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15201 Umm, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor, you're the one who needs to "read" and "think." You are again making a claim about what NIST supposedly said but failing to use NIST as the source. You again posted a kooksite that opens with a completely debunked claim. Try again, dearie. Try NIST. Only NIST says what it says, not "global research.com."
From: Iarnrod on 13 Oct 2009 15:47
On Oct 13, 1:18 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > Ironhead amused its many better with: > > > Hankie proved: > >> Ironhead spanked itself with: > >>> Link deleted because it does not show anything like your delusional > >>> mind claims, > >> If that were true, you wouldn't have to delete it. > > False. > > True. No, Hankie, it's still false. My deleting your KKKooklink does not somehow magicallky make it not a kooklink, and it doesnt make it disappear. It's still right there in your own widdle post. > If the link disproved my claim and supported yours, > and you were sane, you'd leave it there to support your > claim and debunk mine. That is not a necessary part of disproving you. It's funny that you "think" truth can be established through such unrelated actions. Explains how you come to your delusional claims that are proven to be physically impossible. <chuckle> |