A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 18 Feb 2010 13:38 On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > blank assertion? > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > without ether is unthinkable" Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and electrodes for you.
From: mpc755 on 18 Feb 2010 13:42 On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > blank assertion? > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > without ether is unthinkable" > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > electrodes for you. And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the future determining the past is absurd nonsense. A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave.
From: mpalenik on 18 Feb 2010 13:55 On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > blank assertion? > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > electrodes for you. > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's getting ridiculous.
From: mpc755 on 18 Feb 2010 14:01 On Feb 18, 1:55 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > > blank assertion? > > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > > electrodes for you. > > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots > from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's > getting ridiculous. You realize every time you respond and do not answer the question as to your belief in the future determining the past you are undermining the other poster. A moving C-60 molecule is a particle of matter and has an associated aether displacement wave.
From: PD on 18 Feb 2010 14:07
On Feb 18, 12:55 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > > blank assertion? > > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > > electrodes for you. > > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots > from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's > getting ridiculous. Feeble, shameless attempt to manipulate, no? |