Prev: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
Next: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely youcan't be serious.
From: mpc755 on 13 Feb 2010 08:41 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the matter and aether in neighboring places.
From: mpc755 on 13 Feb 2010 08:55 On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > matter and aether in neighboring places. The 'E' in E=mc^2 is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the neighboring matter and aether. I'm guessing you could probably modify the equation to be A=mc^2, where the 'A' is aether, and you would have a decent idea of the difference in volume between matter and aether.
From: mpc755 on 13 Feb 2010 08:59 On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > matter and aether in neighboring places. The 'E' in E=mc^2 is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the neighboring matter and aether. I'm guessing you could probably modify the equation to be A=Mc^2, where the 'A' is aether and 'M' is matter, and you would have a decent idea of the difference in volume between matter and aether.
From: mpc755 on 13 Feb 2010 09:03 On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > matter and aether in neighboring places. The 'E' in E=mc^2 is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the neighboring matter and aether. I'm guessing you could probably modify the equation to be A=Mc^2, where 'A' is aether and 'M' is matter, and you would have a decent idea of the difference in volume between matter and aether.
From: Dono. on 13 Feb 2010 09:17
On Feb 13, 6:03 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 13, 8:41 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > The effects of the newly released aether is energy. Think nuclear > > fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion > > reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the > > matter and aether in neighboring places. > > The 'E' in E=mc^2 is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on > the neighboring matter and aether. I'm guessing you could probably > modify the equation to be A=Mc^2, where 'A' is aether and 'M' is > matter, and you would have a decent idea of the difference in volume > between matter and aether.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Imbecile. Autistic. Autistic imbecile. |