A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
in [Relativity]
|
From: mpalenik on 18 Feb 2010 14:17 On Feb 18, 2:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 1:55 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > > > blank assertion? > > > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > > > electrodes for you. > > > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > > > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots > > from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's > > getting ridiculous. > > You realize every time you respond and do not answer the question as > to your belief in the future determining the past you are undermining > the other poster. > In the end, when the bunnies rule the earth, none of this will matter, anyway.
From: mpalenik on 18 Feb 2010 14:17 On Feb 18, 2:07 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 12:55 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > > > blank assertion? > > > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > > > electrodes for you. > > > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > > > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots > > from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's > > getting ridiculous. > > Feeble, shameless attempt to manipulate, no?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - At least someone understands :)
From: mpc755 on 18 Feb 2010 14:35 On Feb 18, 2:17 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 2:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 18, 1:55 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > > > > blank assertion? > > > > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > > > > electrodes for you. > > > > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > > > > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots > > > from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's > > > getting ridiculous. > > > You realize every time you respond and do not answer the question as > > to your belief in the future determining the past you are undermining > > the other poster. > > In the end, when the bunnies rule the earth, none of this will matter, > anyway. Does a C-60 molecule enter one slit or multiple slits depending upon there being detectors placed at the exits to the slits in the future. Obviously, since you refuse to answer this question you know to believe in such nonsense is absurd. The moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave.
From: BURT on 18 Feb 2010 14:42 On Feb 18, 11:35 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 2:17 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 18, 2:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 1:55 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > > > > > blank assertion? > > > > > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > > > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > > > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > > > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > > > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > > > > > electrodes for you. > > > > > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > > > > > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave.. > > > > > I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots > > > > from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's > > > > getting ridiculous. > > > > You realize every time you respond and do not answer the question as > > > to your belief in the future determining the past you are undermining > > > the other poster. > > > In the end, when the bunnies rule the earth, none of this will matter, > > anyway. > > Does a C-60 molecule enter one slit or multiple slits depending upon > there being detectors placed at the exits to the slits in the future. > > Obviously, since you refuse to answer this question you know to > believe in such nonsense is absurd. > > The moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Sometimes the waves can go away for subatomic particles but not so for atoms.
From: PD on 18 Feb 2010 14:51
On Feb 18, 1:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 2:17 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 2:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 1:55 pm, mpalenik <markpale...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 18, 12:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > And how do you determine which answer is more correct, other than just > > > > > > > > blank assertion? > > > > > > > > Because I do not have to invent a new type of object or believe the > > > > > > > future determines the past and I have quotes such as this one from > > > > > > > Albert Einstein, "According to the general theory of relativity space > > > > > > > without ether is unthinkable" > > > > > > > Ah. OK, you've had your attention for today. Back to the straps and > > > > > > electrodes for you. > > > > > > And the other poster still refuses to respond because they know the > > > > > future determining the past is absurd nonsense. > > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave.. > > > > > I have told you many many times about the bunnies that pick carrots > > > > from the enchanted forest but you simply refuse to listen. It's > > > > getting ridiculous. > > > > You realize every time you respond and do not answer the question as > > > to your belief in the future determining the past you are undermining > > > the other poster. > > > In the end, when the bunnies rule the earth, none of this will matter, > > anyway. > > Does a C-60 molecule enter one slit or multiple slits depending upon > there being detectors placed at the exits to the slits in the future. > > Obviously, since you refuse to answer this question you know to > believe in such nonsense is absurd. You scare the fish when you turn the trolling motor on high. Did no one teach you how to fish? > > The moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. |