A new view of the microwave radiation of the universe has been captured by the Planck satellite
in [Physics]
|
Prev: A new view of the microwave radiation of the universe has beencaptured by the Planck satellite
Next: Unconcentrated energy and Einstein
From: eric gisse on 5 Jul 2010 21:01 Raymond Yohros wrote: [...] > the problem is the cold dark matter > what is its true nature? > can it be something else? Such as? > > r.y
From: Raymond Yohros on 5 Jul 2010 21:33 On Jul 5, 7:51 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Raymond Yohros wrote: > he level of detail is incomplete > > You are guessing. > > The WMAP survey is all-sky, just at a smaller range of frequencies than > Planck. It is not 'incomplete' in any meaningful sense of the word. > that smaller range makes a very big difference! the planck explorer took a long time to build because of having this level of detail. > > and that gives alot of people > > chance to speculate about this matters "specialy about COLD dark > > matter" > > The 'speculation' is the 6 parameter fit to the acoustic peak spectrum. > please feel free to explain what you mean? > > > there should be alot of dark matter but what types and > > how is truly spread out in spacetime is the issue! > > Not a question either WMAP or Planck can answer. > maybe not specifically but oh yeah, GENERALLY tons of the most precious data will come out of this baby. this data will make a model that will destroy any theory that does not fit in reality from the bb, black holes quasars and all the way up to galactic clusters the CBR is like the signature of creation it is the sound of sounds r.y
From: Raymond Yohros on 5 Jul 2010 21:41 On Jul 5, 8:01 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Raymond Yohros wrote: > > [...] > > > the problem is the cold dark matter > > what is its true nature? > > can it be something else? > > Such as? > well you will probably jump on me on this one but i think that they can be BH spinning out of existence? r.y
From: J. Clarke on 5 Jul 2010 22:56 On 7/5/2010 9:41 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > On Jul 5, 8:01 pm, eric gisse<jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Raymond Yohros wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> the problem is the cold dark matter >>> what is its true nature? >>> can it be something else? >> >> Such as? >> > > well you will probably jump on me on this > one but i think that they can be BH > spinning out of existence? Why would they not be detected? Hint--black holes have side effects.
From: eric gisse on 5 Jul 2010 23:00
Raymond Yohros wrote: > On Jul 5, 8:01 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Raymond Yohros wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > the problem is the cold dark matter >> > what is its true nature? >> > can it be something else? >> >> Such as? >> > > well you will probably jump on me on this > one but i think that they can be BH > spinning out of existence? > > r.y They would coalesce. |