From: Raymond Yohros on
On Jul 5, 5:14 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> ScienceShot: Planck Satellite's First View of Universe
> A new view of the microwave radiation of the universe has been captured
> by the Planck satellite.
>
> http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/07/scienceshot-planck-sate...
>

i've been waiting for this mission for more than 12 years
this is the satellite that will take the best picture of the
early universe. plasma's displacement sequence with detail
of color and resolution.

with this data there will be no chance of error.
it will wipe out all the bugs about "cold" dark matter and
bring the true rate of spacetime's expansion to our perception.

neutrino science should go in contrast with this most
extraordinary observation.

r.y


From: eric gisse on
Raymond Yohros wrote:

> On Jul 5, 5:14 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> ScienceShot: Planck Satellite's First View of Universe
>> A new view of the microwave radiation of the universe has been captured
>> by the Planck satellite.
>>
>> http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/07/scienceshot-planck-sate...
>>
>
> i've been waiting for this mission for more than 12 years

Have you heard of WMAP?

> this is the satellite that will take the best picture of the
> early universe. plasma's displacement sequence with detail
> of color and resolution.
>
> with this data there will be no chance of error.
> it will wipe out all the bugs about "cold" dark matter and
> bring the true rate of spacetime's expansion to our perception.

I find it rather hard to believe Planck is going to contradict the {1,3,5,7}
year WMAP data releases that support dark matter.

>
> neutrino science should go in contrast with this most
> extraordinary observation.
>
> r.y

From: eric gisse on
Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 7/5/10 5:14 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> ScienceShot: Planck Satellite's First View of Universe
>> A new view of the microwave radiation of the universe has been captured
>> by the Planck satellite.
>>
>> http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/07/scienceshot-planck-
satellites-fi.html?etoc
>>
>
>
> The negative of the image nicely matches up to the published
> WMAP data! Very nice!

I would hope so.

From: Sam Wormley on
On 7/5/10 5:57 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote:
> On Jul 5, 5:14 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> ScienceShot: Planck Satellite's First View of Universe
>> A new view of the microwave radiation of the universe has been captured
>> by the Planck satellite.
>>
>> http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/07/scienceshot-planck-sate...
>>
>
> i've been waiting for this mission for more than 12 years
> this is the satellite that will take the best picture of the
> early universe. plasma's displacement sequence with detail
> of color and resolution.
>
> with this data there will be no chance of error.
> it will wipe out all the bugs about "cold" dark matter and
> bring the true rate of spacetime's expansion to our perception.
>
> neutrino science should go in contrast with this most
> extraordinary observation.
>
> r.y
>
>

The cold dark matter, is here to stay... Many sources of
data, including the WMAP data.


From: Raymond Yohros on
On Jul 5, 6:19 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Raymond Yohros wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 5:14 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> ScienceShot: Planck Satellite's First View of Universe
> >> A new view of the microwave radiation of the universe has been captured
> >> by the Planck satellite.
>
> >>http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/07/scienceshot-planck-sate....
>
> > i've been waiting for this mission for more than 12 years
>
> Have you heard of WMAP?
>
> > this is the satellite that will take the best picture of the
> > early universe. plasma's displacement sequence with detail
> > of color and resolution.
>
> > with this data there will be no chance of error.
> > it will wipe out all the bugs about "cold" dark matter and
> > bring the true rate of spacetime's expansion to our perception.
>
> I find it rather hard to believe Planck is going to contradict the {1,3,5,7}
> year WMAP data releases that support dark matter.
>

the level of detail is incomplete and that gives alot of people
chance to speculate about this matters "specialy about COLD dark
matter"
there should be alot of dark matter but what types and
how is truly spread out in spacetime is the issue!

regards
r.y