A simple Q. but not a simple A,,
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: float..my farts
Next: LHC Math gives a Doomsday.
From: cjcountess on 19 Jan 2010 10:30 Inertia here are just a couple of examples of hf/c^2 http://usna.edu/Users/physics/mungan/Publications/TPT11.pdf http://isaac.exploratorium.edu/~pauld/summer_institute/summer_day4+5light/what_is_light_quantum.html I realy don't blame anyone if they don't get this right away. It is revolutionay and I am not delusional although I am enthusiastic and of course my own fanatical fan. How would you feel if you discovered something that is as great as I proport this to be? Even if you don't think my idea is, just imagine that it is. And I get to put myself out there in the line of fire, which if I am wrong, will make me look like a fool, and be laughed at. BUT if I am right... I get the last laugh. And he who laughs last--- laugh will last --- a long long time. We are making history people. Thanks for your cooporation Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 19 Jan 2010 12:39 Everyone The opposition is welcome. 1) First, it shows the contrast between pre-existing theories, old and new, making it very clear that this one is unique and original. And places all or most, blame or credit on me. 2) It forces me to be as simple and complete as possible, so that the evidence speaks for itself. This is nessesary for at least two reasons: a] Because I don't have a title or degree, and so "the evidence itself," will have to speak for itself and myself. b] Because it is a very nessesary lesson to be learned in this, which is that the evidence should be veiwed in as "objective and open minded", way as possible, free of all peconcieved notions, even those postulates or axioms that have been taken for granet to be self evidently true. Only in this way can we liberate ourselves from the rut of reason, and mathematics, which has us bogged down in this present physics impass. And this may be the most important lesson of all. Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 19 Jan 2010 15:48 Al, you probably would feel "delusional", if you discovered something as simple yet as profound as I did. Who would have thought it was so simple that even a child or non professional physicist can understand it, but professonal physicist, if they are to ridgit of thinkers cannot seem to. All the time, education, and money, spent on trying to understand "Quantum Gravity", has to a degree, deflected some from the true and simple path that lead to a simple reintertpretation, of a simple equatuion, that was right under our noses all the time, The geometrical interpretation of (E=mc^2). This Geometrical Interpretation, show such a clear and complete picture, of not only "that" energy and matter are "one" related through the mathematical conversion factor of (c^2), but exactly how it is so. A picture really is "worth a thousad words", in this case, and mayby a million dollar "Nobel Prize" Following a simple analogy of "a line of 1 inch in the horizontal direction, times a line of 1 inch, in the vertical direction, to equal a square inch, c in the linear direction x c in the 90 degree angular direction equals c^2. This creates a 90 degree arc trejectory of energy, which if constant creats a circle of energy = cx2pi, with angular momentum, = h/2pi. If amplitude is constant, it will make two rotations at right angle, to eachother to complete one wave cycle ,which creates a standing spherical wave, of (spin 1/2), and angular momentum of (h/2pi/2). Furthermore if it spins backward, counter to its trejectory, will have (-1 charge). Wow how simple - yet how profound. (Quantum Gravity), (The square root of -1) and (Uncertainty Principle) all solved. Renormalization and running coupling constants also solved Unity of constants (c^2 = G = h/2pi) and (c = h = i = 2pi = reduced Compton wavelength = Schwartzchild radius = electron radius). redefining Planck scale putting it within reach of experimental verification. Conrad J Countess P.S. You all make me so much better. Before its over, not only will children and non professionals, understand, but maby even a few old die hard disalusioned professionals like yourself, will finaly have to admit, that there is no way around this. It is so simple, even a child can understand it. Are you smarter than a fifth grader?
From: Inertial on 19 Jan 2010 18:48 "cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:8f956f92-2768-4e7e-98d0-26acbe180ad6(a)p12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... > Inertia > > here are just a couple of examples of hf/c^2 That is mass .. not energy > http://usna.edu/Users/physics/mungan/Publications/TPT11.pdf That is mass .. not energy > http://isaac.exploratorium.edu/~pauld/summer_institute/summer_day4+5light/what_is_light_quantum.html That is mass .. not energy > I realy don't blame anyone if they don't get this right away. Because its nonsense. > It is revolutionay No .. it is just nonsense > and I am not delusional although I am enthusiastic > and of course my own fanatical fan. And delusional > How would you feel if you discovered something that is as great as I > proport this to be? Even if you don't think my idea is, just imagine > that it is. I'd be excited and would get the idea peer reviewed and published in a physics journal But that doesn't mean you are not delusional > And I get to put myself out there in the line of fire, which if I am > wrong, will make me look like a fool, and be laughed at. Already has > BUT if I am > right... You're not > I get the last laugh. And he who laughs last--- laugh will > last --- a long long time. > We are making history people. No .. just making a fool of yourself
From: Inertial on 19 Jan 2010 18:50
"cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3a097b91-b034-44c5-8eed-77a29e9050b1(a)j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > Everyone > The opposition is welcome. > > 1) First, it shows the contrast between pre-existing theories, old and > new, making it very clear that this one is unique and original. And > places all or most, blame or credit on me. What theory? > 2) It forces me to be as simple and complete as possible, so that the > evidence speaks for itself. So far what your present only says that you don't understand physics. > This is nessesary for at least two reasons: > > a] Because I don't have a title or degree, and so "the evidence > itself," will have to speak for itself and myself. That is all that needs to speak .. though you need to put it into words and fomrulas > b] Because it is a very nessesary lesson to be learned in this, which > is that the evidence should be veiwed in as "objective and open > minded", way as possible, Yeup > free of all peconcieved notions, even those > postulates or axioms that have been taken for granet to be self > evidently true. But not what experimental evidence has shown to be the case. You have to rdeal with nature as it is .. not hw you'd like it to be. > Only in this way can we liberate ourselves from the rut of reason, and > mathematics, Well .. you certainly are not bogged down by reason .. what you post is nonsense > which has us bogged down in this present physics impass. > > And this may be the most important lesson of all. Shame you can't learn that if you abandon reason and logic, you end up with things that are unreasonable and illogical .. and wrong. |