A simple Q. but not a simple A,,
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: float..my farts
Next: LHC Math gives a Doomsday.
From: cjcountess on 19 Jan 2010 23:54 On Jan 19, 9:49 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "cjcountess" <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:f271ba93-3645-4c49-a424-c3f608008b6f(a)s19g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > > > A new wave of physics is upon us > > ride the wave, or be washed up by it > > > Conrad J Countess > > Your Captain > > You've gone down with your ship .. its already sunk due to the huge gaping > holes in it. Look at the things "Al" and "inertia" picked out to nit-pic, as they try to unravel my well nitted fabric. I tell them that (E=mc^2), tells us, "that alot of energy is trapped inside of matter, and that they are equal through mathematical conversion factor c^2" .. It is said that, "c or the speed of light", is highest possile speed in the universe. Any child might even ask, "If the speed of light is the highest possile speed, than how can it be squared to make matter? Till today, I have yet to find a professor, or physicist, to explain these seemingly contridictory statements. Even, "linertia and Al", will say that, "c^2 is just a mathematical conversion factor" with no physical structure, and have no idea how energy gets trapped inside of and quals matter at c^2 Just look at Novas PBS show and the explinations of (E=mc^2) therein,http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/expe-text.html Fuethermore, listen to the explinations of, "Uncle Al", and "Inertia", and perhaps even "D.Y.K." Would this be a suitable explination for a child? Would it be suitable for you? It wasn't for me and this is why I out of everyone I know sat out on a quest to answer this question. and this is the answer I obtained after much contemplation and reasearch. I can show you geometricaly, exactly how energy equals, and gets trapped inside of matter, at (c^2), because (c^2), is not just a mathematical conversion factor with no physical structure, but is an actual "frequency/wavelength," with a geometrical structure, of energy in circular and or spherical rotation. And this is how eeergy gets trapped inside of, turns to and equals matter at (c^2) because c^2 = c^circled then even a child can understand how energy equals and turns to matter (E=mc^2) = (E=mc^ circled.) Inertia and Uncle Al cannot even understand this simple most profound idea but I bet a child can. How unvisionary of them The geometrical interpretation of (E=mc^2) contains much more information than just the equation alone and for that matter is a big step forward in the understanding of that equation ,as the geometry gives the equation physical form, and "a picture is worth a thousand words, or even a thousand equations". Conrad J Countess
From: Inertial on 19 Jan 2010 22:36 <kado(a)nventure.com> wrote in message news:c3edc109-31cf-4674-926b-ae8499a99656(a)r10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... > On Jan 18, 7:09 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> > snip >> >> Define 'nonphysical' >> > > This response is not directed to Inertia, But it is a reply to my post > but for anyone else that may be reading this > thread. > This is because I really don�t know how he > thinks or what language he speaks, Don't lie. You can tell damned well that I read and write English > and will > not accept a definition by Isaac Newton is a > definition, Of course it is > or that exposing that Newton > formulated the Three Laws of Momentum instead > of the three laws of motion is not something > new and profound. Not really > No, I cannot define the nonphysical. Didn't think so > I will say it again. No, I cannot define the > nonphysical, because no words, pictures, or > mathematics suffice. So you don't really know what you're talking about [snip more evidence of that]
From: J. Clarke on 20 Jan 2010 00:25 cjcountess wrote: > On Jan 19, 9:49 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "cjcountess" <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:f271ba93-3645-4c49-a424-c3f608008b6f(a)s19g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... >> >>> A new wave of physics is upon us >>> ride the wave, or be washed up by it >> >>> Conrad J Countess >>> Your Captain >> >> You've gone down with your ship .. its already sunk due to the huge >> gaping holes in it. > > Look at the things "Al" and "inertia" picked out to nit-pic, as they > try to unravel my well nitted fabric. > I tell them that > > (E=mc^2), tells us, "that alot of energy is trapped inside of matter, > and that they are equal through mathematical conversion factor c^2" > . > It is said that, "c or the speed of light", is highest possile speed > in the universe. > > Any child might even ask, "If the speed of light is the highest > possile speed, than how can it be squared to make matter? .............................................______ __ .....................................,.-'"...................``~., ..............................,.-"..................................."-., ..........................,/...............................................":, ......................,?........................... ............................, ..................../.................................................. ..........,} ................../.................................................. .....,:`^`..} ................/.................................................. .,:"........./ ...............?.....__............................ ..............:`.........../ ............../__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../ ............/(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`..... ..._/ ...........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....} ............((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../ ....,,,___.`~,......"~.,....................`..... }............../ .............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-" ............./.`~,......`-...................................../ ..............`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....,__ ,,_..........}.>-._...................................|........... ...`=~-, ......`=~-,__......`,................................. ....................`=~-,,.,............................... .................................`:,,.............. ..............`..............__ ......................................`=-,...................,%`>--==`` ........................................._........ ..._,-%.......` ....................................,
From: cjcountess on 20 Jan 2010 02:21 On Jan 20, 12:25 am, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > cjcountesswrote: > > On Jan 19, 9:49 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "cjcountess" <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >>news:f271ba93-3645-4c49-a424-c3f608008b6f(a)s19g2000vbm.googlegroups.com.... > > >>> A new wave of physics is upon us > >>> ride the wave, or be washed up by it > > >>> Conrad J Countess > >>> Your Captain > > >> You've gone down with your ship .. its already sunk due to the huge > >> gaping holes in it. > > > Look at the things "Al" and "inertia" picked out to nit-pic, as they > > try to unravel my well nitted fabric. > > I tell them that > > > (E=mc^2), tells us, "that alot of energy is trapped inside of matter, > > and that they are equal through mathematical conversion factor c^2" > > . > > It is said that, "c or the speed of light", is highest possile speed > > in the universe. > > > Any child might even ask, "If the speed of light is the highest > > possile speed, than how can it be squared to make matter? > > ............................................______ __ > ....................................,.-'"...................``~., > .............................,.-"..................................."-., > .........................,/................................................":, > .....................,?........................... > ..........................., > .................../.................................................. > .........,} > ................./.................................................. > ....,:`^`..} > .............../.................................................. .,:"........../ > ..............?.....__............................ > .............:`.........../ > ............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../ > .........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`..... ..._/ > ..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....} > ...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../ > ...,,,___.`~,......"~.,....................`..... }............../ > ............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-" > ............/.`~,......`-...................................../ > .............`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....,__ > ,,_..........}.>-._...................................|........... ...`=~-, > .....`=~-,__......`,................................. > ...................`=~-,,.,............................... > ................................`:,,.............. > .............`..............__ > .....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==`` > ........................................_........ ..._,-%.......` > ...................................,- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Very Clever "The Geometrical Interpretation of E=mc^2", not only expresses the unity of "energy and matter", and the various "constants", mentioned, but "truth and beauty" also. And it might offend me the way some attact it, as it is such an order of nature. But I know that it also posses one more thing that comforts me, as to its withstanding attacts, and that is its most important unity, that of endurance and strength. No matter how they try, they cannot defeat it, because it is the law of natural itself, and rules them all Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 20 Jan 2010 05:22
On Jan 18, 9:56 pm, k...(a)nventure.com wrote: > Although this is placed as a response to > cjcountess, it also applies to Inertia, > Y. Porat , all who read this thread, and > in fact, all of mainline science. > > For the sake of true science: heed the words > of the wise old sage, i.e.,: > > Learn the meanings of the words, and use > these correctly. This does not mean just > the dictionary definitions. This means when > reading Newtons writings, learn the > > On Jan 15, 5:09 am,cjcountess<cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > snip > > > > > > > 1) Planck discovered (E=hf), for photons > > > 2) Einstein discovered (E=m/c^2) for photons and (E=mc^2) for > > electrons (snip) > > in 1905 thought experiment, yielding that famous equation > > > 3)deBroglie discovered (E=hf=mc^2) for electrons, and that electron is > > also wave, > > as demonstrated by diffraction, constructive and destructive > > interference, > > which is also know for waves light and other forms of waves > > This also indicated a smooth from waves to particles, energy to > > matter > > along the same EM spectrum, which might even be called the "energy/ > > matter", > > as well as "electromagnetic", spectrum > > > 4) Bohr discovered, that wavelength of electron > > = circumference of circle, with an angular momentum of, a multiple > > integer of > > h/2pi. > > These are all wet. > > Planck SUPPOSED that the equation E=hf > applies to photons. > > Einstein SUPPOSED E=m/c^2 is a valid > concept due to the fundamental tenets > of Special Relativity. > > deBroglie accepted on FAITH that Einsteins > equation is gospel, and SUPPOSED that a > single particular photon has the properties > of both waves and particles, and also > SUPPOSED that the equation E=hf=mc^2 > applies to photons (not electrons). So > ASSUMED that this was demonstrated by > diffraction, constructive and destructive > interference, so MISTAKENLY BELIEVED that > the waves of light and other forms of waves > indicated a smooth from waves to particles, > or a smooth energy to matter exchange, > THAT MIGHT, (not IS) be called the > "energy/matter" duality. > > Your #4 is pure Bullshit. > You seem very offended that I used the equations of Planck, Einstein, deBroglie, and Bohr, and that they support my theory so smoothly. And although you are correct in that these ideas and equations are not absolute, they do support my theory so seamlessly and likewise, mine in turn supports the equations and the stated interpretations. My theory must be a threat to yours because you are attacking it in the most trvial ways. Even if each of the stated equations, and their stated meanings, are not perfect, as you pointed out, still, all togather with my geometrical interpretation of (E=mc^2), they gain more support and collaboration. and likewise does mine, exponentily, because the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Conrad J Countess |