A simple Q. but not a simple A,,
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: float..my farts
Next: LHC Math gives a Doomsday.
From: Inertial on 24 Jan 2010 01:07 "cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f4b98341-db33-4b35-a3a3-951d29b1561d(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > More info on John Archibald Wheeler > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=john+archibald+wheeler&rlz=1R2TSHB_enUS361&aq=0&aql=&aqi=g10&oq=John+Arch > > John A. Wheeler, Physicist Who Coined the Term 'Black Hole,' Is ... > Apr 14, 2008 ... Mr. Wheeler > > Conrad J Countess What has that to do with the nonsense you posted? *HE* does not claim that E = hf/c^2. No physicist would.
From: cjcountess on 24 Jan 2010 05:26 Anyone interested This is from post 307 which has link that still works. Goes directly to summary below which goes directly to highlighted example of E=hf/ c^2 in John Archibald Wheeler's book. And the summary below is directly copied from search page, and has exact equation E=hf/c^2. Don't let inertia fool you, he for some reason does'n want people to know this. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4TSHB_.... Using above Google search I found . Spacetime physics: introduction to special relativity - Google Books Result by Edwin F. Taylor, John Archibald Wheeler - 1992 - Science - 312 pages Use the Einstein relation between photon energy £ and classical wave frequency / namely £CTM = WOT E = hf/c2 and £' = hf/c2, to derive the transformations I only respond to this so that others will see that I have that info. I am not use to talking to someone as disrespectful as you without putting you in your place. Just keep talking to me disrespectfuly and you will get same. You are not only disrespecting me, you are disrespecting the group, and showing that you cannot win an argument with intelect alone. You resort to frustration and emotional insults, and I am getting tired of it. This is direct link very long and may or maynot work http://books.google.com/books?id=PDA8YcvMc_QC&pg=PA263&lpg=PA263&dq=e%3Dhf/c2&source=bl&ots=Qx9MQKHw6J&sig=Wx71-iZCz0v08YsXUm42GhU4WpE&hl=en&ei=9hhcS_GVCp6ltgfDioCYAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CB8Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=e%3Dhf%2Fc2&f=false Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 24 Jan 2010 05:35 The link at very bottom works and goes directly to page in book where E=hf/c^2 is highlighted Don't know what happened to other links, but somehow they got corrupted in translation. The same link in post 307 still works though And this one: http://books.google.com/books?id=PDA8YcvMc_QC&pg=PA263&lpg=PA263&dq=e%3Dhf/c2&source=bl&ots=Qx9MQKIo8K&sig=Vc-2k5ItwiBCNrSlw1C0Y640-cE&hl=en&ei=0xlcS8mQKs6WtgffgoXmBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CB0Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=e%3Dhf%2Fc2&f=false Conrad J Countess
From: Inertial on 24 Jan 2010 06:37 "cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:00221b97-e8ee-40ff-89fb-fc5717b640ec(a)e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > Anyone interested > This is from post 307 which has link that still works. Goes directly > to summary below which goes directly to highlighted example of E=hf/ > c^2 Which is wrong > in John Archibald Wheeler's book. And the summary below is > directly copied from search page, and has exact equation E=hf/c^2. Which is wrong > Don't let inertia fool you, he for some reason does'n want people to > know this. Because it is blatantly and totally wrong > http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4TSHB_... > > Using above Google search I found . What search .. its an incomplete URL. > Spacetime physics: introduction to special relativity - Google Books > Result > by Edwin F. Taylor, John Archibald Wheeler - 1992 - Science - 312 > pages > Use the Einstein relation between photon energy � and classical wave > frequency / namely �CTM = WOT E = hf/c2 and �' = hf/c2, to derive the > transformations > I only respond to this so that others will see that I have that info. Where .. provide a link > I am not use to talking to someone as disrespectful as you without > putting you in your place. What place .. you are the one posting incorrect formulas and lying about it. > Just keep talking to me disrespectfuly and you will get same. You are the disrespectful one. By lying. > You are > not only disrespecting me, you are disrespecting the group, Nope . .that is what you are doing by posting nonsense and claiming it to be valid physics. > and > showing that you cannot win an argument with intelect alone. Of course I can .. I already have against you. You're just too stupid to know you've lost. > You > resort to frustration and emotional insults, and I am getting tired of > it. I'm tired of your stupidity. > This is direct link very long and may or maynot work As you well know.. the book has no preview pages available. > http://books.google.com/books?id=PDA8YcvMc_QC&pg=PA263&lpg=PA263&dq=e%3Dhf/c2&source=bl&ots=Qx9MQKHw6J&sig=Wx71-iZCz0v08YsXUm42GhU4WpE&hl=en&ei=9hhcS_GVCp6ltgfDioCYAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CB8Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=e%3Dhf%2Fc2&f=false > > Conrad J Countess When are you going to stop your lies and nonsense?
From: Inertial on 24 Jan 2010 06:39
"cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e75b1c34-1b96-4486-821b-420fdfb5f1d0(a)h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > The link at very bottom works and goes directly to page in book where > E=hf/c^2 is highlighted Nope > Don't know what happened to other links, but somehow they got > corrupted in translation. > > The same link in post 307 still works though Nope > And this one: > > http://books.google.com/books?id=PDA8YcvMc_QC&pg=PA263&lpg=PA263&dq=e%3Dhf/c2&source=bl&ots=Qx9MQKIo8K&sig=Vc-2k5ItwiBCNrSlw1C0Y640-cE&hl=en&ei=0xlcS8mQKs6WtgffgoXmBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CB0Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=e%3Dhf%2Fc2&f=false Nope E = hf/c^2 is utter nonsense .. hf/c^2 is a formula for mass only NOT for energy. Basic dimensional analysis as taught in high school proves that. E = hf is the correct formula, as well you should know. You can't divide energy by c^2 and still have energy .. that is just nonsense. |