A simple Q. but not a simple A,,
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: float..my farts
Next: LHC Math gives a Doomsday.
From: cjcountess on 31 Jan 2010 09:28 On Jan 31, 6:19 am, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 30, 11:10 pm,cjcountess<cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > D.K.Y > > > Why should energy, momentum, and force, have different equations? > > They are different things > > > (F=mv^2), > > Wrong formula .. gees .. this is basic physics > > > is essentialy (E=mc^2) and (1/2KE=mv^2) > > Wrong formula .. gees .. this is basic physics > > > and (p=mv) is (F=mv) > > Wrong formula .. gees .. this is basic physics > > Go back to school (if you ever went) and study some physics. You are > just posting utter nonsense > > [snip rest of drivel] Your ranting only proves that you are overly confident in accepting the difinitions of energy, momentum, and force, and probably anything else on face value. How can you discover anything like that? But if you look at them with a true scientific, objective eye, you will see that they are all the same thing with redundant, unjustified, slitely different definition, to disguise there sameness If (p=mv) and (F=mv) and (E=mc^2) and (F=mv^2) and (KE=1/2mv^2), logicaly and mathematicaly, although not nessearily difinitively if words are played with, but they are the same. Conrad J Countess P.S. Go back to school huh? I learned more than most who studied in school, and did so on my own. As testimony to that, I am presenting some of my most important and revolutionary discoveries to be examined and put on trial here and in other arenas. I am fully confident that they will stand because they are correct. The most profound obstecles that I have incountered so far, is the foolish, and I emphisize "foolish pride", of the formaly educated like yourself, who can't come up with new discoveries themselves. Perhaps, this is because of something you learned, or did not learn in school. Well, you are in school now, and I am going to teach you sonething that you could not learn in school. Why, because they did not even know this. And because like you, they are more interested in who is right, and gets credit for it, than what is objectively right, reguardless of title and degree. I am so glad that I did not learn this in school, because therein lies another lesson. All great discoveries don't come from accadimia, and as Einstien said of Farraday in his aricle on General Relativety, "it muses me to wonder if he could have discovered the things that he did, if he had been encombered by a formaal education" My friend, you and so many of your coleges are incombered, and I am going to enjoy showing you the powers of the natural mind, over the educated encumbered one. Not that I have something against education, because it gives us consistency in structure, and dicipline to work within this consistent. But often, overly complex structures lose there way and become wrongly routed structures, because of tunnel vision, and the foolish pride, that comes with acomplishing such rigoris and strenuous task, even such as being hazed to get into a fraternety, and it takes someone unprogramed, stands and thinks outside of the box to realize this, reach inside this "maze box" in which physics has found itself, and pull some out. You just don't know how important this is, but in time you will. Conrad J Countess
From: kado on 31 Jan 2010 16:07 On Jan 31, 6:28 am, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: A lot of BULLSHIT My father instilled on me, in addition to those already mentioned, to: "With the obvious, common sense exceptions; tell the TRUTH." So: You are an egotistical IDIOT! So keep any mutual admiration between you and schizoid Y.Porat (who claims to be expert No 1 about nuclear mass [see his post of Jan. 18, 3:48 AM]) to yourselves and save band width on this site. D.Y.K.
From: artful on 31 Jan 2010 16:43 On Feb 1, 1:28 am, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 6:19 am, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 11:10 pm,cjcountess<cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > D.K.Y > > > > Why should energy, momentum, and force, have different equations? > > > They are different things > > > > (F=mv^2), > > > Wrong formula .. gees .. this is basic physics > > > > is essentialy (E=mc^2) and (1/2KE=mv^2) > > > Wrong formula .. gees .. this is basic physics > > > > and (p=mv) is (F=mv) > > > Wrong formula .. gees .. this is basic physics > > > Go back to school (if you ever went) and study some physics. You are > > just posting utter nonsense > > > [snip rest of drivel] > > Your ranting only proves that you are overly confident in accepting > the difinitions of energy, momentum, and force, and probably anything > else on face value. How can you discover anything like that? But if > you look at them with a true scientific, objective eye, you will see > that they are all the same thing with redundant, unjustified, slitely > different definition, to disguise there sameness > If (p=mv) and (F=mv) and (E=mc^2) and (F=mv^2) and (KE=1/2mv^2), You got the formulas wrong. Again. You are just spouting nonsense and pontificating about how proud you are of your complete ignorance and lack of education. Sad.
From: cjcountess on 31 Jan 2010 18:23 On Jan 31, 4:07 pm, k...(a)nventure.com wrote: > On Jan 31, 6:28 am,cjcountess<cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > A lot of BULLSHIT > > My father instilled on me, in addition to those > already mentioned, to: "With the obvious, common > sense exceptions; tell the TRUTH." So: > > You are an egotistical IDIOT! > > So keep any mutual admiration between you and > schizoid Y.Porat (who claims to be expert No 1 about > nuclear mass [see his post of Jan. 18, 3:48 AM]) to > yourselves and save band width on this site. > > D.Y.K.. Remember, that the more you claim to know, the more you reveal what you don't know The evidence speaks for itself You what to prove that (E=mc^2), is wrong and my geometrical interpretation of it, which shows that energy attains rest mass at a frequency/wavelenth of (c^2), just adds one more obstical to your refutal, that you or anyone else did not count on. You thought you had all your basis covered by going to college and learning all you could about it. But research is going on all the time in and out of the schools and box. Today you are learning somethng that you did not in school, like it or not And yes artful, I am proud that I did this on my own, so far without any help from the accedemic institutions, and the whole world is going to know, because it is indeed something to be proud of. I will never let someone like "D.K.Y", and "artful", who is not artful, and who by the way, have not discovered anything, discourge me. All people like you do is express jealousy, resentment and anoyance. Both of you cannot even see the unification of energy, force, and momentum, which shows lack of incite into the underlying unity of all things, energy, force, and momentum, being a simple unity, already ointed out in the equations. And like I said The more you claim to know the more you reveal what you don't know, so be very carfull what you say and make sure you have evidence to back it Conrad J Countess
From: artful on 31 Jan 2010 20:16
On Feb 1, 10:23 am, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 4:07 pm, k...(a)nventure.com wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 31, 6:28 am,cjcountess<cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > A lot of BULLSHIT > > > My father instilled on me, in addition to those > > already mentioned, to: "With the obvious, common > > sense exceptions; tell the TRUTH." So: > > > You are an egotistical IDIOT! > > > So keep any mutual admiration between you and > > schizoid Y.Porat (who claims to be expert No 1 about > > nuclear mass [see his post of Jan. 18, 3:48 AM]) to > > yourselves and save band width on this site. > > > D.Y.K.. > > Remember, that the more you claim to know, the more you reveal what > you don't know > > The evidence speaks for itself > > You what to prove that (E=mc^2), is wrong and my geometrical > interpretation of it, which shows that energy attains rest mass at a > frequency/wavelenth of (c^2), just adds one more obstical to your > refutal, that you or anyone else did not count on. > > You thought you had all your basis covered by going to college and > learning all you could about it. But research is going on all the time > in and out of the schools and box. Today you are learning somethng > that you did not in school, like it or not > > And yes artful, > > I am proud that I did this on my own, so far without any help from the > accedemic institutions, and the whole world is going to know, because > it is indeed something to be proud of. > > I will never let someone like "D.K.Y", and "artful", who is not > artful, and who by the way, have not discovered anything, discourge > me. All people like you do is express jealousy, resentment and > anoyance. > > Both of you cannot even see the unification of energy, force, and > momentum, which shows lack of incite into the underlying unity of all > things, energy, force, and momentum, being a simple unity, already > ointed out in the equations. > > And like I said > > The more you claim to know the more you reveal what you don't know, so > be very carfull what you say and make sure you have evidence to back > it > > Conrad J Countess If you are proud of your ignorance, then you have a lot to be proud of. |