Prev: CERN is your potential killer. I’ll send my last 100 baxes to that CERN worker, who will destroy the LHC.
Next: Confirm or deny
From: mpc755 on 31 Dec 2009 16:14
On Dec 31, 4:10 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 31, 12:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The problem with your posts is the following:
>
> > ">< How does ANYONE state an amount of pressure in units of measure
> > other than grams or pounds?  Indeed, since one discovers the "mass" of
> > an object by weighing it, and since weight is given in grams, a gram
> > is a unit of WEIGHT (which is the quantity of PRESSURE a body exerts
> > against a restraining surface usc on Earth). Therefore a gram is a
> > unit of pressure and weight and -- since the textbooks agree that
> > weight is a force -- of force, none of which are quantities of matter.
>
> >   Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since
> > the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of
> > measure of mass. >
>
> > Do you see how in the above where "quantities of matter." ends and
> > "Accordingly" starts? Well who knows if that is left over from the
> > post your are replying to or if it is your post. You have to search
> > your post for "<" and ">"  and "><" to have any idea who is saying
> > what.
>
>   This is worse.
>

No, it is so much better. I immediately found you text, especially
because above "This is worse", it said "- show quoted text -". So, if
I am following this thread, then I do not even have to see what you
are replying to.

> > Here is what google did to my previous reply:
>
> > "> > a restraining surface usc on Earth). Therefore a gram is a unit
> > of
>
> > > > pressure and weight and -- since the textbooks agree that weight is a
> > > > force -- of force, none of which are quantities of matter.
> > >   Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since
> > > the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of
> > > measure of mass. >"
>
> > It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the
> > post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> > should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to.
>
>   In what way is that better?  Here's how I would have written
> Google's prior two paragraphs:
>
> ><< Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of measure of mass. >
>
> >< It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to. >
>
> Or sometimes like this:
> glird: Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and
> since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG
> unit of measure of mass. >
> mpc: It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is
> the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying
> to. >
>
> glird

Just try it for a while and give it a chance.
From: glird on 31 Dec 2009 16:15
On Dec 31, 4:10 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 31, 12:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The problem with your posts is the following:
>
> > ">< How does ANYONE state an amount of pressure in units of measure
> > other than grams or pounds?  Indeed, since one discovers the "mass" of
> > an object by weighing it, and since weight is given in grams, a gram
> > is a unit of WEIGHT (which is the quantity of PRESSURE a body exerts
> > against a restraining surface usc on Earth). Therefore a gram is a
> > unit of pressure and weight and -- since the textbooks agree that
> > weight is a force -- of force, none of which are quantities of matter.
>
> >   Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since
> > the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of
> > measure of mass. >
>
> > Do you see how in the above where "quantities of matter." ends and
> > "Accordingly" starts? Well who knows if that is left over from the
> > post your are replying to or if it is your post. You have to search
> > your post for "<" and ">"  and "><" to have any idea who is saying
> > what.
>
>   This is worse.
>
> > Here is what google did to my previous reply:
>
> > "> > a restraining surface usc on Earth). Therefore a gram is a unit
> > of
>
> > > > pressure and weight and -- since the textbooks agree that weight is a
> > > > force -- of force, none of which are quantities of matter.
> > >   Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since
> > > the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of
> > > measure of mass. >"
>
> > It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the
> > post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> > should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to.
>
>   In what way is that better?  Here's how I would have written
> Google's prior two paragraphs:
>
> ><< Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of measure of mass. >
>
> >< It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to. >
>
> Or sometimes like this:
> glird: Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and
> since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG
> unit of measure of mass. >
> mpc: It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is
> the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying
> to. >
>
> glird

From: mpc755 on 31 Dec 2009 16:22
On Dec 31, 4:15 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 31, 4:10 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 31, 12:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > The problem with your posts is the following:
>
> > > ">< How does ANYONE state an amount of pressure in units of measure
> > > other than grams or pounds?  Indeed, since one discovers the "mass" of
> > > an object by weighing it, and since weight is given in grams, a gram
> > > is a unit of WEIGHT (which is the quantity of PRESSURE a body exerts
> > > against a restraining surface usc on Earth). Therefore a gram is a
> > > unit of pressure and weight and -- since the textbooks agree that
> > > weight is a force -- of force, none of which are quantities of matter..
>
> > >   Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since
> > > the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of
> > > measure of mass. >
>
> > > Do you see how in the above where "quantities of matter." ends and
> > > "Accordingly" starts? Well who knows if that is left over from the
> > > post your are replying to or if it is your post. You have to search
> > > your post for "<" and ">"  and "><" to have any idea who is saying
> > > what.
>
> >   This is worse.
>
> > > Here is what google did to my previous reply:
>
> > > "> > a restraining surface usc on Earth). Therefore a gram is a unit
> > > of
>
> > > > > pressure and weight and -- since the textbooks agree that weight is a
> > > > > force -- of force, none of which are quantities of matter.
> > > >   Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since
> > > > the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of
> > > > measure of mass. >"
>
> > > It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the
> > > post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> > > should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to.
>
> >   In what way is that better?  Here's how I would have written
> > Google's prior two paragraphs:
>
> > ><< Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of measure of mass. >
>
> > >< It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to. >
>
> > Or sometimes like this:
> > glird: Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and
> > since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG
> > unit of measure of mass. >
> > mpc: It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is
> > the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> > should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying
> > to. >
>
> > glird
>
>

glird,

Just type something and hit reply. Don't put any ">", or "<", or "><"
in your response. Just go to what you are responding to, hit return to
start a new line and type.
From: glird on 31 Dec 2009 16:22
On Dec 31, 4:10 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
 Here's how I would have written
> Google's prior two paragraphs:
>
> ><< Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of measure of mass. >
>
> >< It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to. >
>
> Or sometimes like this:
> glird: Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and
> since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG
> unit of measure of mass. >
> mpc: It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is
> the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying
> to. >

Or sometimes like this:
glird: Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and
since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG
unit of measure of mass.
>
mpc: It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is
the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying
to.

In any event, when I clicked on the google page you recommended, it
did want me name and password -- which I do have and filled in -- and
then opened exactly the same page I'd previously opened without going
that route.

So, mpc, thanks again for the advice, but ....

glird
From: mpc755 on 31 Dec 2009 16:31
On Dec 31, 4:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 31, 4:10 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>  Here's how I would have written
>
> > Google's prior two paragraphs:
>
> > ><< Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG unit of measure of mass. >
>
> > >< It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying to. >
>
> > Or sometimes like this:
> > glird: Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and
> > since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG
> > unit of measure of mass. >
> > mpc: It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is
> > the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> > should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying
> > to. >
>
>   Or sometimes like this:
> glird: Accordingly, since "mass" denotes "a quantity of matter", and
> since the aetheric mode of matter has no weight, a gram is the WRONG
> unit of measure of mass.
>
> mpc: It puts a ">" at the beginning of every line so I know this is
> the post being replied to. And if you look at the top of this post you
> should see a ">" in front of every line from the post I am replying
> to.
>
>   In any event, when I clicked on the google page you recommended, it
> did want me name and password -- which I do have and filled in -- and
> then opened exactly the same page I'd previously opened without going
> that route.
>
>   So, mpc, thanks again for the advice, but ....
>
> glird

Well, at least this last post was easy to read. :)
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Prev: CERN is your potential killer. I’ll send my last 100 baxes to that CERN worker, who will destroy the LHC.
Next: Confirm or deny