Aether Displacement Rebuttal
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: CERN is your potential killer. I’ll send my last 100 baxes to that CERN worker, who will destroy the LHC.
Next: Confirm or deny
From: Inertial on 23 Dec 2009 06:34 "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:92c4b5cb-6f3f-4aaa-84ef-3d9437864186(a)x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 14, 9:08 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> That is why such a length is not mathematics, and it is not nonsense. >> It is on the boundary inbetween these things. It is conjectural. >> >> You have >> Truth, Conjecture, and Nonsense. >> >> Truth corresponds to mathematics >> Conjecture corresponds to the existentially indeterminate >> Nonsense corresponds to things which are strictly nonexistent. > > There is no truth. There is trust and troth, that which is trowed. > And there are truthe and sooth. Mathematics don't deal with truthe; > theory does. Canonics deal with sooth. A "truth table" is a misnomer > by dolts who can't English. Like you. Your archaic spelling, and atrocious grammar, are no longer valid in modern English. You make think you are being 'clever', but really you're appearing silly.
From: Autymn D. C. on 23 Dec 2009 06:35 On Dec 15, 6:31 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >< The composition of A and B yields a different kind of of magnitude. It is not mathematics, and it is not [{ ? }] nonsense either. It is a hybrid. And the very interesting thing is that this composition A and B can be explained or modelled using probability theory. > > > > There is a HUGE difference between the "probability" that B has a > > value of zero and the fact that "B doesn't exist". Indeed, if B > > doesn't exist then the probability that the value of B is zero is > > 100%. > > Here's the deal. Let A = 75 and let B = 25. Compose A and B into a > single magnitude (or length). The "conjectured" length is 100. The > "expected" length is 75. And this new conjectured length has the same > properties as an existent segment C of length 100 which has a > "probability of existing = 3/4". 3/4 how? > So maybe you can explain why the numbers work so nicely. "work nicely" means work weakly.
From: Inertial on 23 Dec 2009 06:40 "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:987c16a8-66b4-4867-891b-926e141cb37a(a)h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 15, 6:31 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > >< The composition of A and B yields a different kind of of magnitude. >> > >It is not mathematics, and it is not [{ ? }] nonsense either. It is a >> > >hybrid. And the very interesting thing is that this composition A and >> > >B can be explained or modelled using probability theory. > >> >> > There is a HUGE difference between the "probability" that B has a >> > value of zero and the fact that "B doesn't exist". Indeed, if B >> > doesn't exist then the probability that the value of B is zero is >> > 100%. >> >> Here's the deal. Let A = 75 and let B = 25. Compose A and B into a >> single magnitude (or length). The "conjectured" length is 100. The >> "expected" length is 75. And this new conjectured length has the same >> properties as an existent segment C of length 100 which has a >> "probability of existing = 3/4". > > 3/4 how? > >> So maybe you can explain why the numbers work so nicely. > > "work nicely" means work weakly. Not in modern English it doesn't. Perhaps you should update your vocabulary to this century.
From: Autymn D. C. on 23 Dec 2009 06:45 On Dec 23, 3:40 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in messagenews:987c16a8-66b4-4867-891b-926e141cb37a(a)h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 6:31 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > >< The composition of A and B yields a different kind of of magnitude. > >> > >It is not mathematics, and it is not [{ ? }] nonsense either. It is a > >> > >hybrid. And the very interesting thing is that this composition A and > >> > >B can be explained or modelled using probability theory. > > > >> > There is a HUGE difference between the "probability" that B has a > >> > value of zero and the fact that "B doesn't exist". Indeed, if B > >> > doesn't exist then the probability that the value of B is zero is > >> > 100%. > > >> Here's the deal. Let A = 75 and let B = 25. Compose A and B into a > >> single magnitude (or length). The "conjectured" length is 100. The > >> "expected" length is 75. And this new conjectured length has the same > >> properties as an existent segment C of length 100 which has a > >> "probability of existing = 3/4". > > > 3/4 how? > > >> So maybe you can explain why the numbers work so nicely. > > > "work nicely" means work weakly. > > Not in modern English it doesn't. Perhaps you should update your vocabulary > to this century. There is no modern English: http://google.com/groups?q=Einglish+Dohiwtsch; and the word isn't even English.
From: Autymn D. C. on 23 Dec 2009 06:50
On Dec 23, 3:34 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in messagenews:92c4b5cb-6f3f-4aaa-84ef-3d9437864186(a)x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > > > On Dec 14, 9:08 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> That is why such a length is not mathematics, and it is not nonsense. > >> It is on the boundary inbetween these things. It is conjectural. > > >> You have > >> Truth, Conjecture, and Nonsense. > > >> Truth corresponds to mathematics > >> Conjecture corresponds to the existentially indeterminate > >> Nonsense corresponds to things which are strictly nonexistent. > > > There is no truth. There is trust and troth, that which is trowed. > > And there are truthe and sooth. Mathematics don't deal with truthe; > > theory does. Canonics deal with sooth. A "truth table" is a misnomer > > by dolts who can't English. > > Like you. Your archaic spelling, and atrocious grammar, are no longer valid > in modern English. You make think you are being 'clever', but really you're > appearing silly. My grammar is starksful? Your grammar, speech, and spell are awful and you don't know anything about English. |