Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to date
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Anitmatter in Thunderbolts??
Next: Why Pendulum as a clock do not shows, what General Theory of Relativity predicts?
From: mpc755 on 11 Dec 2009 07:40 It makes no sense to say a C-60 molecule curves aether as it heads towards the slits in a double slit experiment. The C-60 molecule displaces aether as it heads towards the slits in a double slit experiment. Does a moving boat curve the water in front of its bow or does a moving boat displace the water in front of its bow. The density of matter can be variable because the nuclei of the atoms that make up the matter can displace more aether. Again, if you have a lead Jupiter and the real Jupiter, the nuclei of the lead Jupiter occupy more three dimensional space per volume than the nuclei of the atoms which make up the real Jupiter. There is less aether between the nuclei of the lead Jupiter than there is between the nuclei of the real Jupiter. Aether exists where matter does not. Yes, aether and matter are the same stuff, but I prefer the definition of matter to be the nuclei of atoms and the three dimensional space they occupy and the aether to be the stuff that exists everywhere the nuclei of atoms do not (excluding a discussion of neutron stars and black holes at this point). So, beside black holes, there is matter (mostly consisting of the nuclei of atoms) and aether (which fills the spaces between the nuclei of the atoms). So, the larger the nuclei of atoms and the closer they are together in three dimensional space, the less aether there exists between the nuclei of the atoms and the denser the matter is. The smaller the nuclei of atoms are and the further apart from one another they are the less dense the matter is and the more aether which exists between the nuclei. Now, when light bends around the Sun, I prefer to consider the light to be bending due to the displacement of the aether. The aether closest to the surface of the Sun is displaced the most and the neighboring aether is less displaced, and the neighboring aether to that aether is less displaced, and so on. There does not need to be a 'density' of the aether involved in terms of its ability to bend light and to have increased gravitational effects. It just needs to be a matter of the amount of displacement which becomes an amount of pressure against the displacement. But, aether is compressed into matter. There is a difference between the states of matter, the density of matter, and the density of the aether. The density of matter is the amount of, or lack of, aether which exists between the nuclei of the atoms which is the matter. Matter can be compressed and uncompressed (aether). But, I would prefer not to apply the property of density to aether.
From: mpc755 on 11 Dec 2009 07:41 When discussing the concept of the Sun 'curving' 'spacetime', what is being curved? It cannot be three dimensional space because the Sun now occupies that three dimensional space and in terms of three dimensional space, nothing has changed. So, the Sun is 'curving' something. The Sun is 'curving' something physical. The Sun is 'curving' some kind of stuff. Aether, quantum foam, plenum,... are all labels placed on the 'stuff of space'. Yes, aether has a lot of baggage, but it is what it is. And 'displaced' is a better concept than 'curved'. Displaced not only works for 'curved' spacetime, but also works for the observed behaviors of a double slit experiment with C-60 molecules. The moving C-60 molecule displaces aether which forms a wave, just like a boat creates a bow wave in water. 'Casimir effect' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect "In a simplified view, a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position." Should read: A "field" in physics is space filled with aether, and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position. Aether Displacement: The most correct physical unified theory to date.
From: mpc755 on 11 Dec 2009 10:48 A "field" in physics is space filled with aether, and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position.
From: PD on 11 Dec 2009 10:57 On Dec 11, 9:48 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > A "field" in physics is space filled with aether, and the strength of > the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position. That's interesting. Now, in any given region of space, there are several fields that exist there SIMULTANEOUSLY: electric field, magnetic field, gravitational field, strong nuclear field, weak nuclear field. And all of those different fields have different values and directions at each point in space. Now, how is that explained by a single displacement of an aether from its rest position, which of course can have only one value and one direction at any given point in space?
From: mpc755 on 11 Dec 2009 11:07
On Dec 11, 10:57 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 11, 9:48 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > A "field" in physics is space filled with aether, and the strength of > > the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position. > > That's interesting. Now, in any given region of space, there are > several fields that exist there SIMULTANEOUSLY: electric field, > magnetic field, gravitational field, strong nuclear field, weak > nuclear field. And all of those different fields have different values > and directions at each point in space. Now, how is that explained by a > single displacement of an aether from its rest position, which of > course can have only one value and one direction at any given point in > space? Multiple waves interact and continue on. Gravity is displaced aether pushing back. Magnetic and electric fields are waves in the aether. |