Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to date
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Anitmatter in Thunderbolts??
Next: Why Pendulum as a clock do not shows, what General Theory of Relativity predicts?
From: mpc755 on 13 Dec 2009 21:01 On Dec 13, 8:49 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Dec 11, 7:40 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: There is a greater ether density next to objects > including the clean edges of slits. The closer photons or charged > particles come to the edge, the greater will be the drag by the ether > thats there, which causes the photons or charged particles to deviate > from their courses in inverse proportion to how close such come to the > edge. NoEinstein > I have stayed away from applying the property of density to my concept of Aether Displacement. All that is necessary for light to 'bend' around massive objects is for the aether to be displaced by matter. So, the aether which is closes to the Sun, which light passes through, is the most displaced, and the aether next to that aether is displaced somewhat less, and the aether next to that aether is displaced somewhat less, and so on... 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" The state of the aether is its state of displacement. > > > > It makes no sense to say a C-60 molecule curves aether as it heads > > towards the slits in a double slit experiment. The C-60 molecule > > displaces aether as it heads towards the slits in a double slit > > experiment. Does a moving boat curve the water in front of its bow or > > does a moving boat displace the water in front of its bow. > > > The density of matter can be variable because the nuclei of the atoms > > that make up the matter can displace more aether. Again, if you have a > > lead Jupiter and the real Jupiter, the nuclei of the lead Jupiter > > occupy more three dimensional space per volume than the nuclei of the > > atoms which make up the real Jupiter. > > > There is less aether between the nuclei of the lead Jupiter than there > > is between the nuclei of the real Jupiter. Aether exists where matter > > does not. Yes, aether and matter are the same stuff, but I prefer the > > definition of matter to be the nuclei of atoms and the three > > dimensional space they occupy and the aether to be the stuff that > > exists everywhere the nuclei of atoms do not (excluding a discussion > > of neutron stars and black holes at this point). So, beside black > > holes, there is matter (mostly consisting of the nuclei of atoms) and > > aether (which fills the spaces between the nuclei of the atoms). > > > So, the larger the nuclei of atoms and the closer they are together in > > three dimensional space, the less aether there exists between the > > nuclei of the atoms and the denser the matter is. The smaller the > > nuclei of atoms are and the further apart from one another they are > > the less dense the matter is and the more aether which exists between > > the nuclei. > > > Now, when light bends around the Sun, I prefer to consider the light > > to be bending due to the displacement of the aether. The aether > > closest to the surface of the Sun is displaced the most and the > > neighboring aether is less displaced, and the neighboring aether to > > that aether is less displaced, and so on. There does not need to be a > > 'density' of the aether involved in terms of its ability to bend light > > and to have increased gravitational effects. It just needs to be a > > matter of the amount of displacement which becomes an amount of > > pressure against the displacement. > > > But, aether is compressed into matter. There is a difference between > > the states of matter, the density of matter, and the density of the > > aether. The density of matter is the amount of, or lack of, aether > > which exists between the nuclei of the atoms which is the matter. > > Matter can be compressed and uncompressed (aether). But, I would > > prefer not to apply the property of density to aether. > >
From: mpc755 on 14 Dec 2009 10:39 On Dec 11, 10:16 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 27, 10:23 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Aether is an elastic medium and does not rest when displaced. It > > pushes back. When matter displaces the aether, the pressure the aether > > exerts back towards the matter is gravity. > > > When a C-60 molecule is used in a double slit experiment, the > > displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates in the aether enters and > > exits multiple slits while the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single > > slit. > > > A=Mc^2 where A is aether and M is matter. > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > For those who may not be of mediocre mind, ask yourself, is it more > likely the C-60 molecule enters one or more slits depending on there > being, or not being, detectors at the exits to the slits when it gets > there in the future (the detectors are placed, and, or, removed from > the exits to the slits while the C-60 molecule is in the slits) or is > it more likely the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the > aether and it is the aether wave which enters and exits multiple slits > while the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit? The Maxwellians By Bruce J. Hunt "Maxwell still hoped one day to find the true mechanical structure of the ether, but until new experimental evidence allowed him to say something more definitive, he thought it best to found the laws of electromagnetism on as general and unhypothetical a basis as possible." Unfortunately, the double slit experiment with C-60 molecules was not performed until recently. 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" The state of the aether is its state of displacement.
From: PD on 14 Dec 2009 10:51 On Dec 13, 7:42 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Dec 10, 11:01 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: Some of your quickly-scanned mumblings sound like a vain > attempt to paraphrase what I myself have said, and to put your own > spin on my new science TRUTHS. Some people might be flattered by such > imitation. But when science is explained in its simplest and most > easily understood form, no variant explanations are needed. > NoEinstein > > > > > Please don't go there. > I gotta say I LOVE this conversation.
From: mpc755 on 14 Dec 2009 11:05 The Maxwellians By Bruce J. Hunt "Maxwell still hoped one day to find the true mechanical structure of the ether, but until new experimental evidence allowed him to say something more definitive, he thought it best to found the laws of electromagnetism on as general and unhypothetical a basis as possible." Unfortunately, the double slit experiment with C-60 molecules was not performed until recently. 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" The state of the aether is its state of displacement.
From: mpc755 on 15 Dec 2009 08:32
On Dec 14, 11:05 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The Maxwellians By Bruce J. Hunt > > "Maxwell still hoped one day to find the true mechanical structure of > the ether, but until new experimental evidence allowed him to say > something more definitive, he thought it best to found the laws of > electromagnetism on as general and unhypothetical a basis as > possible." > > Unfortunately, the double slit experiment with C-60 molecules was not > performed until recently. > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" > > The state of the aether is its state of displacement. The moving particle creates a displacement wave in the substance of space directly in front of the path it is traveling. The particle cannot be detected without detecting the displacement wave. Detecting 'which way' means detecting the particle. Detecting the particle means detecting the displacement wave. Detecting 'which way' turns the displacement wave into chop. Detecting 'which way' destroys the displacement wave. |