From: Han de Bruijn on
John Schutkeker wrote:

> You're nothing but fatalists. Quitters, even.

Yeah, look how simple life is, according to America. There are two kind
of people: loosers and winners. And George Bush happens to be a winner.

Han de Bruijn

From: John Schutkeker on
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn(a)DTO.TUDelft.NL> wrote in news:9ed01$44fd392c
$82a1e228$31509(a)news1.tudelft.nl:

> John Schutkeker wrote:
>
>> You're nothing but fatalists. Quitters, even.
>
> Perelman is a quitter as well. The next step is to think about why.

He just didn't want that million bucks. :P
From: John Schutkeker on
"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote in
news:87wt8ilgga.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org:

> Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn(a)DTO.TUDelft.NL> writes:
>
>> Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> And it weren't me. But your post sure makes it look like it's
>>> directed to me as well as Han.
>>
>> Uhm, Jesse, it seems to me that you are a web-publisher as well:
>> 14.900 articles via Google, at first sight. I would be surprised if
>> that doesn't outnumber your publications in paper-based journals.
>
> I don't use web-publishing instead of journals, but in addition to
> journals.
>
> I am not so dismissive of the importance of peer-reviewed publication
> as you are. But I also see the value of web publications (and I don't
> mean Usenet posts!).

How long until a scientific YouTube appears?
From: Han de Bruijn on
John Schutkeker wrote:

> I said "under"employed, not "un"employed. If you're a software engineer
> capable of writing CFD codes, you should be worth a PhD.

This underemployed engineer has found the final solution to his problem
of being worth a PhD and all the other qualifications he desires.

http://huizen.dto.tudelft.nl/deBruijn/builtin.htm

Dutch:

http://huizen.dto.tudelft.nl/deBruijn/inbouw.htm

Nooit meer beklemd titelloos wakker worden.

Han de Bruijn

From: John Schutkeker on
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn(a)DTO.TUDelft.NL> wrote in
news:8b490$44fd6776$82a1e228$16387(a)news1.tudelft.nl:

> John Schutkeker wrote:
>
>> I said "under"employed, not "un"employed. If you're a software
>> engineer capable of writing CFD codes, you should be worth a PhD.
>
> This underemployed engineer has found the final solution to his
> problem of being worth a PhD and all the other qualifications he
> desires.
>
> http://huizen.dto.tudelft.nl/deBruijn/builtin.htm
>
> Dutch:
>
> http://huizen.dto.tudelft.nl/deBruijn/inbouw.htm
>
> Nooit meer beklemd titelloos wakker worden.

Sigh, if only it were so easy. :(