And now the news from VODC Germany
in [Visual Objects]
|
Prev: Vo 2.7 Garbage Collector
Next: CRC32
From: GSchaller on 14 Nov 2006 03:06 Rob, Fine time to be going all sensitive on me <g> but I think the word 'abusive' us being abused here. She doesn't have any idea what she is talking about and she said so. So I meant exactly what I said and you will note that Ginny has made the same comments to me in the past. You didn't jump to my defence then and why is this any different? In this case her contribution is exactly as I've described it. It was ill conceived and thoroughly confused the discussion, which could have highlighted some important points about Vulcan. I expected more from her, especially as she is of the inner circle and double especially because of her involvement in the recent VODC. She regularly accuses me of foot in mouth disease but on this occasion she is chewing firmly on all 5 toes. Geoff "Rob" <rob(a)rndsoftware.com.au> wrote in message news:ejbo7j$24u$1(a)newsreader.mailgate.org: > Geoff, > > sorry, but I don't think that there is any need for abusive comments like: > > > > You've really got no idea, have you. > > > > Perhaps it would have been better not to respond. > > > I know, I know - it's only a bit of winding up and not abusive etc. etc. but > I found it quite offensive, and has demeaned you in my eyes... > > What happened to the 'new sensitive Aussie male'? > > Rob Grattan > > R&D Software
From: GSchaller on 14 Nov 2006 03:10 Jamal, > You say that you will evaluate Vulcan, I say, don't! Because you will just > create so many useless threads and jump on people throats as always! It's Hmmm... so you are already predicting that there will be many problems. Interesting. However, I will do what is professionally responsible to do. I was part of the original putsch for Vulcan and I intend to see it through. > BTW, Ginny has been very nice to you but you have been very abusive. You're > just pushing you luck because you will end up in a lot of people's ignore > list! Abusive? ...there we go again. Is your skin that thin? What I've said here is nothing in comparison to what you've said to me in this forum so go take a happy pill and a nice lie down. There. Pleasant enough for you? <g> Geoff
From: Don Caton on 14 Nov 2006 09:16 "dan(a)computerconsult.com" <dan(a)computerconsult.com> wrote in message news:1163238180.289268.145770(a)b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: > To: the community at large (I just hit reply on the bottom message, > sorry Geoff) Dan: Thank you for your thoughtful and reasoned post. It is unfortunate that a small handful of people seem to have nothing better to do than to bash and denigrate everything that Grafx does, but the best thing to do is simply to ignore them or even better, just put them in your kill file. There still are useful and helpful messages here and if you eliminate the noise, it's a much more pleasant environment. > I am ready to be amazed..... Thanks for your trust and confidence. -- Don Vulcan.NET Development
From: Don Caton on 14 Nov 2006 09:21 "Ginny Caughey" <ginny.caughey.online(a)wasteworks.com> wrote in message news:4rr547Fsf73nU1(a)mid.individual.net: > Heiko, > > Yes you can do the whole CodeDom thing in Vulcan too just as you suggest. As > far as I know that's more or less how macros are implemented in Vulcan > anyway. But with Vulcan you also have the option of just easily using macros > like in VO. No. The Vulcan.NET macro compiler is a subset of the full compiler. It does not use a CodeDom to generate code, it generates code directly in the form of dynamic methods. -- Don
From: Ginny Caughey on 14 Nov 2006 10:03
Hi Don, Even cooler! Thanks for the clarification. I hope you had a good trip back - I realize you were traveling until today. -- Ginny "Don Caton" <dcaton(a)shorelinesoftware.com> wrote in message news:soudna-QqOxKTcTYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d(a)comcast.com... > "Ginny Caughey" <ginny.caughey.online(a)wasteworks.com> wrote in message > news:4rr547Fsf73nU1(a)mid.individual.net: > >> Heiko, >> >> Yes you can do the whole CodeDom thing in Vulcan too just as you suggest. >> As >> far as I know that's more or less how macros are implemented in Vulcan >> anyway. But with Vulcan you also have the option of just easily using >> macros >> like in VO. > > No. The Vulcan.NET macro compiler is a subset of the full compiler. It > does not use a CodeDom to generate code, it generates code directly in the > form of dynamic methods. > > -- > Don > > |