From: Nicolas Matringe on
Hello
I've been trying to download these 2.9GB for 3 days with numerous
retries (thanks to the download manager, the 'resume' resulted in a
restart from 0) and when I finally managed to get the full file it was
corrupted.
Now I want to order a DVD and when I click on the appropriate link on
the web site I get redirected to the home page.

Who at Xilinx wants to prevent people from using their products ?

Nico
From: Mike Harrison on
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:08:51 -0700 (PDT), Nicolas Matringe <nic_o_mat(a)msn.com> wrote:

>Hello
>I've been trying to download these 2.9GB for 3 days with numerous
>retries (thanks to the download manager, the 'resume' resulted in a
>restart from 0) and when I finally managed to get the full file it was
>corrupted.
>Now I want to order a DVD and when I click on the appropriate link on
>the web site I get redirected to the home page.
>
>Who at Xilinx wants to prevent people from using their products ?

Maybe the same people that >1 year leadtimes are acceptable.
From: maxascent on
I cant understand what was wrong with the old way of doing things i.e. just
use your own download manager to get a zip file. Since they introduced the
new method I have never managed to get it to work. Every time I pause the
download it throws up an error when I try to resume it.

Jon

---------------------------------------
Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com
From: cfelton on
>On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:08:51 -0700 (PDT), Nicolas Matringe
<nic_o_mat(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
>>Hello
>>I've been trying to download these 2.9GB for 3 days with numerous
>>retries (thanks to the download manager, the 'resume' resulted in a
>>restart from 0) and when I finally managed to get the full file it was
>>corrupted.
>>Now I want to order a DVD and when I click on the appropriate link on
>>the web site I get redirected to the home page.
>>
>>Who at Xilinx wants to prevent people from using their products ?
>
>Maybe the same people that >1 year leadtimes are acceptable.
>

It sounds like, for serious product developers, that using Xilinx's latest
and greatest (devices and software) is not a great idea. The options are
either stick with the older devices and software (11.3 been working ok for
me). Or move to another FPGA manufacture that seems to be more consistent.


Others have posted that Lattice seems to deliver better results but is a
(perceived) generation behind. I say perceived because if you can't get
the latest and greatest parts from X are they really ahead? Also, since X
dropped NuHo it has been harder for me to get parts. NuHo distributes
Lattice so we are strongly considering Lattice for our next design.

There must be something to the quick / unstable latest and greatest
releases. Because we all keep using their parts and some how putting up
with the issues.

Other than ISE we haven't had any huge issues with Xilinx (until they
dropped NuHo). We don't upgrade our ISE to the latest, we try desperately
not to get the latest ISE.

Many have been interested in getting the latest X 7 series but then the
frustration mounted because no parts are actually available. I think the
car companies do the same thing? Generating hype, if it is good or bad
hype?

If you are using an older device (non-spartan6) you might want to try
ISE10.x version (can it still be downloaded?).

.chris

---------------------------------------
Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com
From: rich12345 on
On Jul 15, 1:08 am, Nicolas Matringe <nic_o_...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> Hello
> I've been trying to download these 2.9GB for 3 days with numerous
> retries (thanks to the download manager, the 'resume' resulted in a
> restart from 0) and when I finally managed to get the full file it was
> corrupted.


I had the same problem. I can't remember which browser wasn't working
(IExplorer or FireFox)..... But when I switched to the other browser,
the download worked fine with the download manager.


Rich