Apropos of nothing: broadband
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Rowland McDonnell on 2 Jun 2010 21:03 Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 31 May 2010 07:23:57 +0100, > >> real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) > > > wrote: > > > > > Although, now I come to think of it... > > > > There is something of interest here. > > > > You know, it's usual for a crowd of bullies to pick on someone who's > > weaker and has less friends than belong to the crowd, and for that > > crowd > > to insult and belittle their victim with all kinds of vile abuse. > > In the way that it is also usual for someone who is a bit of a > megalomaniac to hear everyone complaining about their behaviour and > think "everyone is picking on me because they are all bad people who are > obsessed with me" Yes, that kind of snide derision is an ideal example of the vile behaviour I get from you and your nasty mates that I'm complaining about. I'm talking about your policy of repeatedly deliberately mis-representating my viewpoints with the intention of causing me to be ridiculed as if I really did profess the absurd ideas you falsely proclaim as being attributed to me. It's malicious dishonesty on your part, is that form of underhand personal attack against my credibility. And it's one that you default to, any time you find yourself being criticised by me. The ever-repeated pattern is as follows: you can't cope with criticism of your behaviour, so you attack my credibility using despicably dishonest tactics, as explained above. You seem unable to admit that you fall into that standard pattern of behaviour in response to criticism from me - you lack self-awareness, which is normal for your type. <shrug> But it's nothing more than the standard knee-jerk reaction from jerks like you - common enough amongst your type, is your nasty and dishonest behaviour towards me. I'm wondering when you're going to admit to yourself that you suffer from a behavioural disorder and seek treatment for it. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Woody on 3 Jun 2010 04:17
Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > >> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> > > wrote: >>> T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 07:23:57 +0100, >>>> real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>> Although, now I come to think of it... >>> >>> There is something of interest here. >>> >>> You know, it's usual for a crowd of bullies to pick on someone who's >>> weaker and has less friends than belong to the crowd, and for that >>> crowd >>> to insult and belittle their victim with all kinds of vile abuse. >> >> In the way that it is also usual for someone who is a bit of a >> megalomaniac to hear everyone complaining about their behaviour and >> think "everyone is picking on me because they are all bad people who > > are >> obsessed with me" > > I'm talking about your policy of repeatedly deliberately > mis-representating my viewpoints with the intention of causing me to > be > ridiculed as if I really did profess the absurd ideas you falsely > proclaim as being attributed to me. I am not misrepresenting your viewpoint, I didn't say you said that or even implied that. That was my opinion of one possible counter argument to yours. I am not saying that it is true, there is simply no way to tell. However, you do seem to express a lot of opinions that to me seem paranoid. > It's malicious dishonesty on your part, is that form of underhand > personal attack against my credibility. Why dishonest? Surely if it is what I believe (and you know I believe you to be much madder than a box of frogs) then it is perfect,y honest is it not? > And it's one that you default to, any time you find yourself being > criticised by me. > > The ever-repeated pattern is as follows: you can't cope with criticism > of your behaviour, so you attack my credibility using despicably > dishonest tactics, as explained above. I really don't care about your criticism of me, I don't find your opinion to be one I respect as I rarely see anything of worth in it. Feel free, as I know you find criticism of others easier than answering questions from people who disagreed with you > I'm wondering when you're going to admit to yourself that you suffer from a behavioural disorder and seek treatment for it. Well, if you are an example of someone who has received treatment, it hardly seems worth it! -- Woody |