Aptitude Error
in [Debian]
|
Prev: This math formula work a few month a go, but nowadays it didn't work anymore
Next: invisible console (solved)
From: Daniel Burrows on 1 May 2010 00:10 On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:58:19PM -0700, Daniel Burrows <dburrows(a)debian.org> was heard to say: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss(a)iguanasuicide.net> was heard to say: > > My instinct is that '-t $something' effectively increases the priority of all > > packages from the $something repository, which may make the dependency > > resolver pull more from that repository than is absolutely necessary. > > If you pass "-t ARCHIVE", that means that versions from ARCHIVE are > treated as the default package version. It also increases the pin > priority to 990. aptitude's resolver tries particularly hard to install > the default package version, and it will tie-break using the priority > (you can configure both those behaviors extensively, but those are the > defaults). The story is more extreme with the apt resolver: it won't > even consider anything but the default version of a package. That's not quite right. The default version is the highest-priority available version. It just happens that setting the pin priority to 990 *normally* has the effect of changing the default version, but you could theoretically manually pin another version to be higher. The second effect of Default-Release is to change how certain aptitude / apt-get commands choose the target version. This includes "apt-get source", "apt-get build-dep", "aptitude build-dep", "aptitude changelog", "aptitude download", and "aptitude show". In aptitude, it causes arguments with no archive or version specifier to be treated as if "/default-release" had been included. Unfortunately, it's dreadfully underdocumented and underspecified. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100501040733.GF26444(a)emurlahn.burrows.local
From: Mike Viau on 1 May 2010 00:10 > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H <tomh0665(a)gmail.com> was heard to say: > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram <aspnair(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by > > > apt-show-versions | grep unstable > > > > Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable" > "aptitude search ~Aunstable" seems to show all packages from sid (wheather installed or not) try " aptitude search ~Aunstable | grep '^i' " -M _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail & Messenger are available on your phone. Try now. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724461
From: Daniel Burrows on 1 May 2010 00:20 On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0400, Mike Viau <viaum(a)sheridanc.on.ca> was heard to say: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H <tomh0665(a)gmail.com> was heard to say: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram <aspnair(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by > > > > apt-show-versions | grep unstable > > > > > > Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable" > > > > "aptitude search ~Aunstable" seems to show all packages from sid (wheather installed or not) > > try " aptitude search ~Aunstable | grep '^i' " Ah, I missed that requirement. How about this: $ aptitude versions --group-by=none --show-package-name=always \ -F '%p %d' '?archive(unstable)?installed' Or for earlier systems: $ aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)' Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100501041056.GG26444(a)emurlahn.burrows.local
From: Mike Viau on 1 May 2010 00:40 > Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:10:56 -0700 <dburrows(a)debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0400, Mike Viau <viaum(a)sheridanc.on.ca> was heard to say: > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H <tomh0665(a)gmail..com> was heard to say: > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram <aspnair(a)gmail..com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by > > > > > apt-show-versions | grep unstable > > > > > > > > Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable" > > > > > > > "aptitude search ~Aunstable" seems to show all packages from sid (wheather installed or not) > > > > try " aptitude search ~Aunstable | grep '^i' " > > Ah, I missed that requirement. > > How about this: > > $ aptitude versions --group-by=none --show-package-name=always \ > -F '%p %d' '?archive(unstable)?installed' > > Or for earlier systems: > > $ aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)' > debian01:~# aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)' -bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(' _________________________________________________________________ Live connected. Get Hotmail & Messenger on your phone. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724462
From: Tom H on 1 May 2010 00:50
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau <viaum(a)sheridanc.on.ca> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H <tomh0665(a)gmail.com> was >> heard to say: >> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram <aspnair(a)gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system >> > > by >> > > apt-show-versions | grep unstable >> > >> > Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable" >> > > "aptitude search ~Aunstable" seems to show all packages from sid (wheather > installed or not) > > try " aptitude search ~Aunstable | grep '^i' " Oops! "aptitude search ~Aunstable~i" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/j2r6d4219cc1004302146t8aeac35ax923069b8544415d1(a)mail.gmail.com |