Prev: This math formula work a few month a go, but nowadays it didn't work anymore
Next: invisible console (solved)
From: James Stuckey on 30 Apr 2010 06:30
Why am I getting this and how can I fix it?

root(a)debian:/home/stuckey# aptitude install fakeroot devscripts build-essential
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information... Done
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
build-essential g++{a} g++-4.4{ab} gcc{a} gcc-4.4{ab}
libstdc++6-4.4-dev{ab}
0 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 7,126B/9,723kB of archives. After unpacking 27.3MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
g++-4.4: Depends: gcc-4.4-base (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is installed.
gcc-4.4: Depends: gcc-4.4-base (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is installed.
Depends: cpp-4.4 (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is installed.
libstdc++6-4.4-dev: Depends: gcc-4.4-base (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is
installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Keep the following packages at their current version:
1) build-essential [Not Installed]
2) g++ [Not Installed]
3) g++-4.4 [Not Installed]
4) gcc [Not Installed]
5) gcc-4.4 [Not Installed]
6) libstdc++6-4.4-dev [Not Installed]

Tier: Cancel all user actions (20000)

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
From: James Stuckey on 30 Apr 2010 06:40
> Have you tried "apt-get update" or "aptitude update" before trying to
> install these packages?
>
>
Yes, I did "aptitude safe-upgrade" after "aptitude update" and then
"aptitude full-upgrade".

I selected "n" and it prompted me to "downgrade the packages to testing".
This means that the versions it had were newer than testing, i.e., from sid.
How could this be if I followed 2.7.3 of DR? According to that, my candidate
version is appropriately set:

stuckey(a)debian:~$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Default-Release "testing";
From: Anand Sivaram on 30 Apr 2010 06:40
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 15:58, James Stuckey <jhstuckey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Why am I getting this and how can I fix it?
>
> root(a)debian:/home/stuckey# aptitude install fakeroot devscripts
> build-essential
> Reading package lists... Done
>
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Reading extended state information... Done
> Initializing package states... Done
>
> Reading task descriptions... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> build-essential g++{a} g++-4.4{ab} gcc{a} gcc-4.4{ab}
>
> libstdc++6-4.4-dev{ab}
> 0 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 7,126B/9,723kB of archives. After unpacking 27.3MB will be used.
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-4.4: Depends: gcc-4.4-base (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is installed.
> gcc-4.4: Depends: gcc-4.4-base (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is installed.
>
> Depends: cpp-4.4 (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is installed.
> libstdc++6-4.4-dev: Depends: gcc-4.4-base (= 4.4.2-9) but 4.4.3-9 is
> installed.
> The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>
>
> Keep the following packages at their current version:
> 1) build-essential [Not Installed]
> 2) g++ [Not Installed]
>
> 3) g++-4.4 [Not Installed]
> 4) gcc [Not Installed]
> 5) gcc-4.4 [Not Installed]
>
> 6) libstdc++6-4.4-dev [Not Installed]
>
> Tier: Cancel all user actions (20000)
>
> Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
>
>

Have you tried "apt-get update" or "aptitude update" before trying to
install these packages?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/z2sd0bf7b0b1004300333z1a5921f7o5f878986973d05f8(a)mail.gmail.com
From: Kousik Maiti on 30 Apr 2010 06:50
Try

apt-get install fakeroot devscripts build-essential

If it gives error then post your /etc/apt/sources.list



On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:07 PM, James Stuckey <jhstuckey(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Have you tried "apt-get update" or "aptitude update" before trying to
>> install these packages?
>>
>>
> Yes, I did "aptitude safe-upgrade" after "aptitude update" and then
> "aptitude full-upgrade".
>
> I selected "n" and it prompted me to "downgrade the packages to testing".
> This means that the versions it had were newer than testing, i.e., from sid.
> How could this be if I followed 2.7.3 of DR? According to that, my candidate
> version is appropriately set:
>
> stuckey(a)debian:~$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
> APT::Default-Release "testing";
>
>
>
>


--
Wishing you the very best of everything, always!!!
Kousik Maiti(কৌশিক মাইতি)
Registered Linux User #474025
Registered Ubuntu User # 28654
From: James Stuckey on 30 Apr 2010 07:00
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Kousik Maiti <kousikster(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Try
>
> apt-get install fakeroot devscripts build-essential
>
> If it gives error then post your /etc/apt/sources.list
>
>
>
>> I selected "n" and it prompted me to "downgrade the packages to testing".
>> This means that the versions it had were newer than testing, i.e., from sid.
>> How could this be if I followed 2.7.3 of DR? According to that, my candidate
>> version is appropriately set:
>>
>>
>>
I selected "n" and then "y" and it downgraded the packages to testing. Why
would they have been upgraded in the first place? Here is my sources file:

stuckey(a)debian:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb ftp://ftp.debian-multimedia.org squeeze main non-free

deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free

#deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free

deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: This math formula work a few month a go, but nowadays it didn't work anymore
Next: invisible console (solved)