Art of Electronics, 3rd edition ?
in [Design]
|
From: invalid on 9 Jan 2010 19:28 On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:25:47 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:06:18 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" ><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >>Jim Thompson wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:25:06 -0500, Stephan Goldstein >>> <sgoldHAM(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:04:02 -0700, Jim Thompson >>> ><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >>> > >>> [snip] >>> >> >>> >>xray, Legris, and Riddle have been on my no-retrieve-list for years, >>> >>so I'm just now seeing this diatribe. >>> >> >>> >>WHEN have these birds EVER posted a circuit or solution? >>> >> >>> >>I'm disappointed in you, Steve :-( >>> >> >>> >>Being politically correct, following the messiah blindly, DOES NOT >>> >>MAKE YOU A GOOD CIRCUIT DESIGNER. >>> > >>> >True, but I have yet to find a circumstance when politicial posts >>> >have improved my design skills. >>> > >>> >I will say no more on this topic. >>> >>> You would restrict my freedom of speech? >>> >>> Aren't my circuit responses dead-on accurate? (Except for an >>> occasional typo ?:-) >>> >>> I'll stick strictly to circuits IF EVERYONE ELSE WILL ALSO DO SO. Of >>> course SED will then die, because there's rarely anything electronic >>> actually ever posted, and at that, they're so juvenile they should >>> have been posted in sci.electronics.basics >> >> >> Sometimes I think we need a news:sci.electroincs.idiot newsgroup to >>point some people to. >> >> I notice these whiners never mention Dimbulb, Sloman or EEyore. > >Of course not. The dweebs need their messiahs to look up to... the >super dweebs need Win Hill ;-) > > ...Jim Thompson -- THIS POSTING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ELECTRONICS WHERE ARE THE THOUGHT POLICE WHEN YOU NEED THEM?
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 9 Jan 2010 19:39 Jim Thompson wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:06:18 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" > <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> Jim Thompson wrote: >>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:25:06 -0500, Stephan Goldstein >>> <sgoldHAM(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:04:02 -0700, Jim Thompson >>>> <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >>>> >>> [snip] >>>>> xray, Legris, and Riddle have been on my no-retrieve-list for years, >>>>> so I'm just now seeing this diatribe. >>>>> >>>>> WHEN have these birds EVER posted a circuit or solution? >>>>> >>>>> I'm disappointed in you, Steve :-( >>>>> >>>>> Being politically correct, following the messiah blindly, DOES NOT >>>>> MAKE YOU A GOOD CIRCUIT DESIGNER. >>>> True, but I have yet to find a circumstance when politicial posts >>>> have improved my design skills. >>>> >>>> I will say no more on this topic. >>> You would restrict my freedom of speech? >>> >>> Aren't my circuit responses dead-on accurate? (Except for an >>> occasional typo ?:-) >>> >>> I'll stick strictly to circuits IF EVERYONE ELSE WILL ALSO DO SO. Of >>> course SED will then die, because there's rarely anything electronic >>> actually ever posted, and at that, they're so juvenile they should >>> have been posted in sci.electronics.basics >> >> Sometimes I think we need a news:sci.electroincs.idiot newsgroup to >> point some people to. >> >> I notice these whiners never mention Dimbulb, Sloman or EEyore. > > Of course not. The dweebs need their messiahs to look up to... the > super dweebs need Win Hill ;-) > > ...Jim Thompson Yeah. He merely co-authored the best and most accessible general electronics book for decades. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: Archimedes' Lever on 9 Jan 2010 23:49 On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:25:47 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:06:18 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" ><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >>Jim Thompson wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:25:06 -0500, Stephan Goldstein >>> <sgoldHAM(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:04:02 -0700, Jim Thompson >>> ><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >>> > >>> [snip] >>> >> >>> >>xray, Legris, and Riddle have been on my no-retrieve-list for years, >>> >>so I'm just now seeing this diatribe. >>> >> >>> >>WHEN have these birds EVER posted a circuit or solution? >>> >> >>> >>I'm disappointed in you, Steve :-( >>> >> >>> >>Being politically correct, following the messiah blindly, DOES NOT >>> >>MAKE YOU A GOOD CIRCUIT DESIGNER. >>> > >>> >True, but I have yet to find a circumstance when politicial posts >>> >have improved my design skills. >>> > >>> >I will say no more on this topic. >>> >>> You would restrict my freedom of speech? >>> >>> Aren't my circuit responses dead-on accurate? (Except for an >>> occasional typo ?:-) >>> >>> I'll stick strictly to circuits IF EVERYONE ELSE WILL ALSO DO SO. Of >>> course SED will then die, because there's rarely anything electronic >>> actually ever posted, and at that, they're so juvenile they should >>> have been posted in sci.electronics.basics >> >> >> Sometimes I think we need a news:sci.electroincs.idiot newsgroup to >>point some people to. >> >> I notice these whiners never mention Dimbulb, Sloman or EEyore. > >Of course not. The dweebs need their messiahs to look up to... the >super dweebs need Win Hill ;-) > > ...Jim Thompson Why don't you and Terrell get a room? We don't need to see you licking each others' balls in the technical groups.
From: krw on 10 Jan 2010 01:01 On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:49:47 -0800, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:25:47 -0700, Jim Thompson ><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: > >>On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:06:18 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" >><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>Jim Thompson wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:25:06 -0500, Stephan Goldstein >>>> <sgoldHAM(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:04:02 -0700, Jim Thompson >>>> ><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >>>> > >>>> [snip] >>>> >> >>>> >>xray, Legris, and Riddle have been on my no-retrieve-list for years, >>>> >>so I'm just now seeing this diatribe. >>>> >> >>>> >>WHEN have these birds EVER posted a circuit or solution? >>>> >> >>>> >>I'm disappointed in you, Steve :-( >>>> >> >>>> >>Being politically correct, following the messiah blindly, DOES NOT >>>> >>MAKE YOU A GOOD CIRCUIT DESIGNER. >>>> > >>>> >True, but I have yet to find a circumstance when politicial posts >>>> >have improved my design skills. >>>> > >>>> >I will say no more on this topic. >>>> >>>> You would restrict my freedom of speech? >>>> >>>> Aren't my circuit responses dead-on accurate? (Except for an >>>> occasional typo ?:-) >>>> >>>> I'll stick strictly to circuits IF EVERYONE ELSE WILL ALSO DO SO. Of >>>> course SED will then die, because there's rarely anything electronic >>>> actually ever posted, and at that, they're so juvenile they should >>>> have been posted in sci.electronics.basics >>> >>> >>> Sometimes I think we need a news:sci.electroincs.idiot newsgroup to >>>point some people to. >>> >>> I notice these whiners never mention Dimbulb, Sloman or EEyore. >> >>Of course not. The dweebs need their messiahs to look up to... the >>super dweebs need Win Hill ;-) >> >> ...Jim Thompson > > > Why don't you and Terrell get a room? > > We don't need to see you licking each others' balls in the technical >groups. Yeah, Jim. Archimedes' Liar is getting jealous.
From: TheJoker on 10 Jan 2010 01:53
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:01:42 -0600, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:49:47 -0800, Archimedes' Lever ><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: > >>On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:25:47 -0700, Jim Thompson >><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:06:18 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" >>><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:25:06 -0500, Stephan Goldstein >>>>> <sgoldHAM(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:04:02 -0700, Jim Thompson >>>>> ><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >> >>>>> >>xray, Legris, and Riddle have been on my no-retrieve-list for years, >>>>> >>so I'm just now seeing this diatribe. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>WHEN have these birds EVER posted a circuit or solution? >>>>> >> >>>>> >>I'm disappointed in you, Steve :-( >>>>> >> >>>>> >>Being politically correct, following the messiah blindly, DOES NOT >>>>> >>MAKE YOU A GOOD CIRCUIT DESIGNER. >>>>> > >>>>> >True, but I have yet to find a circumstance when politicial posts >>>>> >have improved my design skills. >>>>> > >>>>> >I will say no more on this topic. >>>>> >>>>> You would restrict my freedom of speech? >>>>> >>>>> Aren't my circuit responses dead-on accurate? (Except for an >>>>> occasional typo ?:-) >>>>> >>>>> I'll stick strictly to circuits IF EVERYONE ELSE WILL ALSO DO SO. Of >>>>> course SED will then die, because there's rarely anything electronic >>>>> actually ever posted, and at that, they're so juvenile they should >>>>> have been posted in sci.electronics.basics >>>> >>>> >>>> Sometimes I think we need a news:sci.electroincs.idiot newsgroup to >>>>point some people to. >>>> >>>> I notice these whiners never mention Dimbulb, Sloman or EEyore. >>> >>>Of course not. The dweebs need their messiahs to look up to... the >>>super dweebs need Win Hill ;-) >>> >>> ...Jim Thompson >> >> >> Why don't you and Terrell get a room? >> >> We don't need to see you licking each others' balls in the technical >>groups. > >Yeah, Jim. Archimedes' Liar is getting jealous. Thanks for the repost, idiot. |