Atoms in molecules have to expand at bond when heated
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: !!! Isn't Mark(ie) Great !!!
Next: Static g-fields
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 9 Dec 2009 06:25 On Dec 9, 2:51 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2:21 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 8, 7:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 6:34 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > wrote: > > > > > "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > > > > >Granted that I am no physicist, but my recollection is that if you > > > > >apply heat to a substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat > > > > >will go into molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster. > > > > > You are correct. Ignore Mitch, he believes that if he can think it up, it > > > > must be true, despite often hundereds of years of knowledge to the > > > > contrary. Physics by proclamation. > > > > I invite anyone to disprove the lack of quantization for energy > > > transitions of atoms for the coantings of a mirror. A mirror's > > > reflection dispoves absolute quantization. > > > Before anybody tries to **disprove** your theories, first you have to > > **prove** them. Tens of thousands of "scientist wannabees" fantasise > > hundreds of new theories each on a daily basis. There aren't enough > > sane scientists to "disprove" all of them. > > > Thus, if you want anybody to pay any attention - you better provide > > hard evidence to support your claims and to disprove the fact that has > > been demonstrated by science myriads of times: if you apply heat to a > > substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat will go into > > molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It's hard to diprove a mirror's lack of quantization. > Good for you. All you have to do now is clearly state your claims and give concrete evidence to support those (if any), which differ from what normal people believe.
From: BURT on 9 Dec 2009 16:21 On Dec 9, 3:25 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2:51 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 2:21 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 7:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 8, 6:34 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > wrote: > > > > > > "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > > > > > >Granted that I am no physicist, but my recollection is that if you > > > > > >apply heat to a substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat > > > > > >will go into molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster. > > > > > > You are correct. Ignore Mitch, he believes that if he can think it up, it > > > > > must be true, despite often hundereds of years of knowledge to the > > > > > contrary. Physics by proclamation. > > > > > I invite anyone to disprove the lack of quantization for energy > > > > transitions of atoms for the coantings of a mirror. A mirror's > > > > reflection dispoves absolute quantization. > > > > Before anybody tries to **disprove** your theories, first you have to > > > **prove** them. Tens of thousands of "scientist wannabees" fantasise > > > hundreds of new theories each on a daily basis. There aren't enough > > > sane scientists to "disprove" all of them. > > > > Thus, if you want anybody to pay any attention - you better provide > > > hard evidence to support your claims and to disprove the fact that has > > > been demonstrated by science myriads of times: if you apply heat to a > > > substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat will go into > > > molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > It's hard to diprove a mirror's lack of quantization. > > Good for you. All you have to do now is clearly state your claims and > give concrete evidence to support those (if any), which differ from > what normal people believe.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - IF you can't disprove it why bother Ostap? Mitch Raemsch
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 9 Dec 2009 21:18 On Dec 9, 1:21 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 3:25 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2:51 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 9, 2:21 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 7:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 8, 6:34 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > >Granted that I am no physicist, but my recollection is that if you > > > > > > >apply heat to a substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat > > > > > > >will go into molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster. > > > > > > > You are correct. Ignore Mitch, he believes that if he can think it up, it > > > > > > must be true, despite often hundereds of years of knowledge to the > > > > > > contrary. Physics by proclamation. > > > > > > I invite anyone to disprove the lack of quantization for energy > > > > > transitions of atoms for the coantings of a mirror. A mirror's > > > > > reflection dispoves absolute quantization. > > > > > Before anybody tries to **disprove** your theories, first you have to > > > > **prove** them. Tens of thousands of "scientist wannabees" fantasise > > > > hundreds of new theories each on a daily basis. There aren't enough > > > > sane scientists to "disprove" all of them. > > > > > Thus, if you want anybody to pay any attention - you better provide > > > > hard evidence to support your claims and to disprove the fact that has > > > > been demonstrated by science myriads of times: if you apply heat to a > > > > substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat will go into > > > > molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > It's hard to diprove a mirror's lack of quantization. > > > Good for you. All you have to do now is clearly state your claims and > > give concrete evidence to support those (if any), which differ from > > what normal people believe.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > IF you can't disprove it why bother Ostap? > I am waiting for you to prove it, Mitch.
From: BURT on 9 Dec 2009 21:39 On Dec 9, 6:18 pm, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 1:21 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 3:25 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 9, 2:51 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 9, 2:21 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 8, 7:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 6:34 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > >Granted that I am no physicist, but my recollection is that if you > > > > > > > >apply heat to a substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat > > > > > > > >will go into molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster. > > > > > > > > You are correct. Ignore Mitch, he believes that if he can think it up, it > > > > > > > must be true, despite often hundereds of years of knowledge to the > > > > > > > contrary. Physics by proclamation. > > > > > > > I invite anyone to disprove the lack of quantization for energy > > > > > > transitions of atoms for the coantings of a mirror. A mirror's > > > > > > reflection dispoves absolute quantization. > > > > > > Before anybody tries to **disprove** your theories, first you have to > > > > > **prove** them. Tens of thousands of "scientist wannabees" fantasise > > > > > hundreds of new theories each on a daily basis. There aren't enough > > > > > sane scientists to "disprove" all of them. > > > > > > Thus, if you want anybody to pay any attention - you better provide > > > > > hard evidence to support your claims and to disprove the fact that has > > > > > been demonstrated by science myriads of times: if you apply heat to a > > > > > substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat will go into > > > > > molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > It's hard to diprove a mirror's lack of quantization. > > > > Good for you. All you have to do now is clearly state your claims and > > > give concrete evidence to support those (if any), which differ from > > > what normal people believe.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > IF you can't disprove it why bother Ostap? > > I am waiting for you to prove it, Mitch.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The proof is in the pudding ostap.
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 9 Dec 2009 22:23
On Dec 9, 6:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 6:18 pm, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 1:21 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 9, 3:25 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 9, 2:51 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 9, 2:21 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > > > > > > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 8, 7:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 6:34 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > >Granted that I am no physicist, but my recollection is that if you > > > > > > > > >apply heat to a substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat > > > > > > > > >will go into molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster.. > > > > > > > > > You are correct. Ignore Mitch, he believes that if he can think it up, it > > > > > > > > must be true, despite often hundereds of years of knowledge to the > > > > > > > > contrary. Physics by proclamation. > > > > > > > > I invite anyone to disprove the lack of quantization for energy > > > > > > > transitions of atoms for the coantings of a mirror. A mirror's > > > > > > > reflection dispoves absolute quantization. > > > > > > > Before anybody tries to **disprove** your theories, first you have to > > > > > > **prove** them. Tens of thousands of "scientist wannabees" fantasise > > > > > > hundreds of new theories each on a daily basis. There aren't enough > > > > > > sane scientists to "disprove" all of them. > > > > > > > Thus, if you want anybody to pay any attention - you better provide > > > > > > hard evidence to support your claims and to disprove the fact that has > > > > > > been demonstrated by science myriads of times: if you apply heat to a > > > > > > substance like a liquid or gas, then most of this heat will go into > > > > > > molecules, not atoms, moving/vibrating faster.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > It's hard to diprove a mirror's lack of quantization. > > > > > Good for you. All you have to do now is clearly state your claims and > > > > give concrete evidence to support those (if any), which differ from > > > > what normal people believe.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > IF you can't disprove it why bother Ostap? > > > I am waiting for you to prove it, Mitch.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The proof is in the pudding ostap. > I prefer tiramisu, but what's your point? Where is your pudding? |