Atoms in molecules have to expand at bond when heated
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: !!! Isn't Mark(ie) Great !!!
Next: Static g-fields
From: Inertial on 11 Dec 2009 19:18 "BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c482799f-ea56-4f95-bb97-b72bceac32a1(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 10, 6:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Dec 10, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Also quantization doesn't work for a mirror. >> Opaque objects violate quantization in that they absorb every >> frequency. This is further dispoof of Quantum Mechanics in more than >> one case. Nope . doesn't disprove it at all. Just as having light sources that can generate a whole range of frequencies (eg 'white' light) doesn't disproves it. You really need to read and learn before posting and publicizing your ignorance.
From: BURT on 11 Dec 2009 19:22 On Dec 11, 4:18 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:c482799f-ea56-4f95-bb97-b72bceac32a1(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... > > > On Dec 10, 6:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Dec 10, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> Also quantization doesn't work for a mirror. > >> Opaque objects violate quantization in that they absorb every > >> frequency. This is further dispoof of Quantum Mechanics in more than > >> one case. > > Nope . doesn't disprove it at all. It dispoves the primary principle of Quantum quantization. That is where it got its name. Mitch Raemsch Just as having light sources that can > generate a whole range of frequencies (eg 'white' light) doesn't disproves > it. > > You really need to read and learn before posting and publicizing your > ignorance.
From: Inertial on 11 Dec 2009 19:35 "BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:87654a72-0b65-4b2c-8c2f-5675c8186736(a)y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 11, 4:18 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:c482799f-ea56-4f95-bb97-b72bceac32a1(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... >> >> > On Dec 10, 6:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Dec 10, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> Also quantization doesn't work for a mirror. >> >> Opaque objects violate quantization in that they absorb every >> >> frequency. This is further dispoof of Quantum Mechanics in more than >> >> one case. >> >> Nope . doesn't disprove it at all. > > It dispoves the primary principle of Quantum quantization. That is > where it got its name. Nope .. it does not disprove that at all. You really need to read and learn before posting and publicizing your ignorance.
From: BURT on 11 Dec 2009 19:40 On Dec 11, 4:35 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:87654a72-0b65-4b2c-8c2f-5675c8186736(a)y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Dec 11, 4:18 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >>news:c482799f-ea56-4f95-bb97-b72bceac32a1(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On Dec 10, 6:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 10, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >>> Also quantization doesn't work for a mirror. > >> >> Opaque objects violate quantization in that they absorb every > >> >> frequency. This is further dispoof of Quantum Mechanics in more than > >> >> one case. > > >> Nope . doesn't disprove it at all. > > > It dispoves the primary principle of Quantum quantization. That is > > where it got its name. > > Nope .. it does not disprove that at all. > > You really need to read and learn before posting and publicizing your > ignorance.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I have proven the disproof. Mitch Raemsch
From: Inertial on 11 Dec 2009 20:03
"BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:6a97ab54-db8b-4ea1-9a98-dfdaa0ca83ba(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 11, 4:35 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:87654a72-0b65-4b2c-8c2f-5675c8186736(a)y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 11, 4:18 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:c482799f-ea56-4f95-bb97-b72bceac32a1(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > On Dec 10, 6:43 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Dec 10, 6:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Also quantization doesn't work for a mirror. >> >> >> Opaque objects violate quantization in that they absorb every >> >> >> frequency. This is further dispoof of Quantum Mechanics in more >> >> >> than >> >> >> one case. >> >> >> Nope . doesn't disprove it at all. >> >> > It dispoves the primary principle of Quantum quantization. That is >> > where it got its name. >> >> Nope .. it does not disprove that at all. >> >> You really need to read and learn before posting and publicizing your >> ignorance.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > I have proven the disproof. Nope .. you're just making wild uninformed assertions from ignorance. |