BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: ****Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
Next: *******Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
From: Darwin123 on 15 Jun 2010 13:46 On Jun 6, 11:26 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL > This belongs in TALK.ORIGINS, or TALK.CREATION. For some reason, you chose not have those groups on your list. This topic is entirely off-topic for SCI.PHYSICS or SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY. Do you see any rational connection between developmental biology and relativity? Or between fundamental religion and relativity? Furthermore, Google groups does not support posting to SCI.BIOLOGY.
From: Androcles on 15 Jun 2010 14:17 "Darwin123" <drosen0000(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:b77d37f6-87ec-4308-a441-fdafa5a5b696(a)k39g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... On Jun 6, 11:26 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL > This belongs in TALK.ORIGINS, or TALK.CREATION. For some reason, you chose not have those groups on your list. This topic is entirely off-topic for SCI.PHYSICS or SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY. Do you see any rational connection between developmental biology and relativity? Or between fundamental religion and relativity? Furthermore, Google groups does not support posting to SCI.BIOLOGY. ============================================= George Hammond has been hospitalized, he is genuinely psychotic. That's not name-calling or merely insulting, he really is deranged. Calling you deranged is fine, you can fight back, but I leave Hammond alone and advise you to as well. One should not mock the afflicted, he is not fair game. You wouldn't take candy from a baby, would you?
From: Darwin123 on 15 Jun 2010 21:51 On Jun 15, 2:17 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > "Darwin123" <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:b77d37f6-87ec-4308-a441-fdafa5a5b696(a)k39g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 6, 11:26 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:> BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL > > This belongs in TALK.ORIGINS, or TALK.CREATION. For some reason, > you chose not have those groups on your list. This topic is entirely > off-topic for SCI.PHYSICS or SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY. > Do you see any rational connection between developmental biology > and relativity? Or between fundamental religion and relativity? > Furthermore, Google groups does not support posting to > SCI.BIOLOGY. > ============================================= > George Hammond has been hospitalized, he is genuinely psychotic. I didn't know that. > That's not name-calling or merely insulting, he really is deranged. > Calling you deranged is fine, you can fight back, but I leave Hammond > alone and advise you to as well. One should not mock the afflicted, he > is not fair game. I wasn't mocking him. I was taking him seriously. I was suggesting that he post somewhere else because he was off topic. He is as coherent or more than the other Creationists on talk.origins. I still think that Hammond would blend in very well there. I will refrain from responding to Hammond in the future.
From: Androcles on 16 Jun 2010 01:49
"Darwin123" <drosen0000(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:684c88fa-3ad7-4152-9ec5-01e39f2b8c6f(a)y4g2000yqy.googlegroups.com... On Jun 15, 2:17 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > "Darwin123" <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:b77d37f6-87ec-4308-a441-fdafa5a5b696(a)k39g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 6, 11:26 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:> BIOLOGY > IN A NUT SHELL > > This belongs in TALK.ORIGINS, or TALK.CREATION. For some reason, > you chose not have those groups on your list. This topic is entirely > off-topic for SCI.PHYSICS or SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY. > Do you see any rational connection between developmental biology > and relativity? Or between fundamental religion and relativity? > Furthermore, Google groups does not support posting to > SCI.BIOLOGY. > ============================================= > George Hammond has been hospitalized, he is genuinely psychotic. I didn't know that. > That's not name-calling or merely insulting, he really is deranged. > Calling you deranged is fine, you can fight back, but I leave Hammond > alone and advise you to as well. One should not mock the afflicted, he > is not fair game. I wasn't mocking him. I was taking him seriously. I was suggesting that he post somewhere else because he was off topic. He is as coherent or more than the other Creationists on talk.origins. I still think that Hammond would blend in very well there. I will refrain from responding to Hammond in the future. ======== Thank you. |