From: George Hammond on
BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL

1. The Body starts as a single cell (the egg).
2. The DNA molecule divides and the cell divides.
3. DNA codes for proteins wch. are manufactured
in the cells and grows the cells to full size again.
4. As cells proliferate differentiation of cells is
effected by turning on and off various gene
sequences in the DNA molecule thus producing
different organ tissue types.
5. Meanwhile the L-R symmetry of the body derives
from the first cell division. The R cell forms the R
half of the body and the L cell forms the L half
mirror symmetrically.
6. Subsequent tissue elaboration is mainly controlled
by local conditions and mechanisms eliciting
elaborate parallel cascades of complex chemical
reactions producing nerves, veins, bones etc.
7. Presumably all of this originated historically in
totally random and haphazard mutations in the
DNA molecule wch. were then culled via
natural selection to leave by default the
surviving version of DNA wch. we produces
Man today.


DEDUCTION:

Presuming the above synopsis of human ontogeny
is basically correct, we see that there IS NO resident
"blueprint" anywhere in the body which has a total
"map" or "design" of a fully grown human body.
Rather, the human organism is simply the result
of MASSIVE SEQUENTIAL CASCADES of billions
of chemical reactions WITHOUT any "master plan"
or "blueprint" of the final result resident anywhere
in the body.
On the other hand IT IS TRUE that given the
existing DNA molecule and the existing cell machinery
in the egg that the production of what we call the
"human body" is predictably inevitable every time given
normal environmental conditions. To draw an analogy,
given identical conditions, kicking over the kerosene
lantern in Mrs. Leary's barn will produce the same identical
Chicago fire every single time...even there is no
"blueprint" for the result contained in the lantern. It's
simply predictable... and same is true with
the production of the human body from the egg.


CONCLUSION:

Based on historical psychological investigations, world
Religion, particularly Christianity, has posited that the
human body resorts to a "virtual reality" (e.g. a
"super-dream" state) upon death where it is
"Resurrected" as a PERFECTED virtual body.
Recent developments have allowed as how such a
virtual reality could possibly be effected by microwave or
infrared signals (Frohlich) in the Microtubule cytoskeleton
of the cells immediately after death. There appears to be
no a priori theoretical roadblock to such a conjecture.
HOWEVER, the theory of Life After Death (LAD) also
holds that the resurrected (spiritual/virtual) body will
be "perfected"... i.e. will be perfect.
As we now know no one has a perfect body... in fact
some people far less perfect (fully grown) than others,
and Hammond has shown that this Secular Trend Growth
Deficit is the DIRECT PSYCHOLOGICAL CAUSE of the
world wide phenomenon we call "God".
According to this theory, having a perfect (fully grown)
body is tantamount to being in a condition of "eternal
life" and since no one is or ever has been in such a
condition,
no one has eternal life.... but supposedly
the "resurrection body" will be "fully grown" and
therefore we WILL HAVE "eternal life" in this conjectured
afterlife state.
THE PROBLEM then, seems to be HOW the microtubule
system, which only has access to the ACTUAL BODY we
were born with could be ABLE to produce a FULLY GROWN
body in this Afterlife Dreamstate resurrection?
since we have just deduced that there IS NO internal
blueprint for a perfect body anywhere to be found in the
body
..... where could it get the information to concoct one?
It seems that the "Beatific Resurrection" as posited by
St. Paul in I Corinthians Ch. 15 vs: 35-55 would be in fact
a physically-biologically impossible!!!!

ANYONE ABLE TO MAKE ANY ASTUTE OR
LEARNED COMMENTARY CONCERNING THIS
SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS WILL BE MORE THAN
WELCOME.

George Hammond, M.S. Physics

========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
From: " snip sycostooge>" on
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:56:15 -0700
From: bigfletch8 on
>
> 1.  The Body starts as a single cell (the egg).

It just 'happened" ?


SNIP


You premise is always to try to solve the 'spiritual' via physical
references/conjecture, albeit a very worthwhile intellectual exercise
(the body also thrives on exercise).

One clue of many varied attempts to solve what is also known as the
'absolute', via laws of relativity, is typified by your reference to
eternity which has nothing whatever to do with the 'time based'
processes to which you refer.

In eternity, you dont 'become' anything, you 'is'.

What you are looking at, and searching for, are clues. The solution is
to identify the searcher, not the search.

Science has reached 'literally' the outer limits, beyond which are
empirical free zones (Hawking talks of 'imaginary time' beyond the
event horizon for example.

You have noted 'first is the cell', but why, is also beyond the grasp
of science.If that is the case, then why, as a species, do we keep
searching?

Simply because the individual has an insatiable need for 'self'
discovery. The empirical, and even epistemological, requires external
confirmation.

An anathema to self realization.

Perhaps to give your left side brain a rest (a misnomer btw), you
should read some of Rumi's poetry occasionally.

Bear in mind, the greatest scholars of the past,"Newton, da
Vinci,Pythagoras etc, were a reservoir of all disciplines.

BOfL

From: Zerkon on
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 23:26:19 -0400, George Hammond wrote:

> 1. The Body starts as a single cell (the egg).

Arbitrary beginning. This single cell can be framed as result.

> HOWEVER, the theory of Life After Death (LAD) also
> holds that the resurrected (spiritual/virtual) body will
> be "perfected"

The fact of the life after death which still holds human continuity is
the continuation of species. Perhaps this resurrection theory is a result
of this "prime directive".

For instance, during a state of sexual urge all types of perfection
theories are personally formed even to the point of witnessed phenomena.

I, myself, in a past, have done extensive research in this area as I know
many others have also across all human history. I, or we, have found that
given a saloon environment, as one example, and given a time constraint
(ie: a "closing time") most persons of sexual preference (eg: females)
will trend towards body perfection. They will physically, and so
objectively, change in as little as 20 minutes, somehow.

So if Darwin, then all of Darwin. If god, then all of god. There is
obviously life after death. No theory needed.

Humans are not annuals but perennials. The primal sense and reality of
being individual helps to ensure this. Maybe just not on our own personal
terms all the time but then what else is new?
From: Shelly on

"George Hammond" <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote in message
news:70bq065ueo2c8085reagjjnbddqa0i3r0g(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 23:26:19 -0400, George Hammond
> <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote:
>
> BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL
>
> 1. The Body starts as a single cell (the egg).

Parthenogenesis, ahoy!

--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net/blog