Best Coolpix for HD and low light too?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 23:30 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >>> To me, that sounds like you're in favour of the violent affects >>> associated with pistol packing, in effect initiating violence against >>> others... >> >> How is possessing property "initiating" force. You've just shown that >> you dont even know the meaning of the word. > > Let's put it this way, if you've got to carry a piece around to get a > smile from your neighbour, it's kind of like holding up the bank, only > the payoff's not in money, it's in behaviour... I alreadu said that no one else knows I carry, so again, how is merely possessing property "initiating" force. >>> You don't actually have to show it to use it in a violent, offensive >>> manner... >> >> Huh? >> >> >> -- >> - Jane Galt > > Think about it... I'm sure you'll figure it out, eventually... You havent. -- - Jane Galt
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 23:30 "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9EDA878156CJaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > >> >> "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message >> news:Xns9D9ED640A3F1EJaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >>> >>>>> You realize that you're essentially saying that you dont trust people > to >>>>> make the judgements necessary to even defend themselves, right? >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, not at all. I told SD in this very thread I'd feel a lot safer if > we >>>> had a lot more trained cops, retired officers / military types > wandering >>>> around packing pistols, even living right next door... >>>> >>>> I just get a bit edgy when people paint an entire nation unfavourably >>>> because of a perceived discrepancy in beliefs, belittle their > neighbours >>>> because they won't offer support for packing legislation, and in > general >>>> display a rather immature attitude... >>>> >>>> Those people should not be carrying. >>> >>> You want to dictate who may exercise their human rights. I see. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - Jane Galt >> >> When crazies want to carry guns in public, yep... I'd like to add my >> input... > > What about when people you consider crazy want to exercise free speech or > religion? > > And who are you to judge someone else "crazy"? > > In your philosophy, nothing really means anything anyway, therefore the > term "crazy" is purely your opinion, it has no objective definition. > Therefore your opinion is meaningless. > > > -- > - Jane Galt ditto ... :) Take Care, Dudley
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 23:30 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > > "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message > news:Xns9D9ED7602F22FJaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >> >> >>> As a blind guy out walking around, if I get a bit disoriented and look >>> like I could use a helping hand, it's interesting that Muslims, or at >>> least people who come across as Muslims, are the ones most often to >>> offer help... One day, I must have looked hungry in addition to lost, so >>> this elderly Muslim fellow, even offered to share his lunch with me... >>> >>> Then, I come home, get on the internet, and how do the fine "white folk" >>> come across? Well, if I'd let the crazies on this group sway me, I'd >>> head for the nearest Mosque and look into joining... >>> >> >> Go for it, you sound quite compatible. You want to inflict your brand of >> tyranny on the human rights of everyone else. Great mob rule tyrant. >> >> >> -- >> - Jane Galt > > That was a figure of speech which I'd hoped would illustrate just what > lengths behaviour like yours might lead others too. But, of course, as a > bigot of the highest order, others are always in the wrong... here we go, anyone who disagrees with Marx is a "racist". So boring. -- - Jane Galt
From: Jane Galt on 21 Jun 2010 23:34 "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > > "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message > news:Xns9D9ED7779C113JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : >> >> >>> Just the kind of mature, level-headed woman we'd all feel real safe >>> around, knowing she's packing a pistol... >>> >> >> Go ahead, tell us you have a "right to feel safe" now. LOL >> >> >> >> -- >> - Jane Galt > > Actually, that's why most countries maintain a police / military force. > Wouldn't go so far as to say I'd like anything in writing, but I'm > pretty sure a lot of politicians would be out pounding the pavement if > the majority starts getting overly antsy... > > Besides, isn't that safe feeling why you're packing? If you have a > right to carry a gun to feel safe, why does that trump my right to keep > that gun away from you in order for me to feel safe? If you had any grasp at all, of the meaning of freedom, I wouldnt have to take you by the hand and explain it. Because you dont, no explanation can work. "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams You're a waste of time, a festering tyrant. Bye now. -- - Jane Galt
From: Dudley Hanks on 21 Jun 2010 23:36
"Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9D9EDABC81F75JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote : > >>>> To me, that sounds like you're in favour of the violent affects >>>> associated with pistol packing, in effect initiating violence against >>>> others... >>> >>> How is possessing property "initiating" force. You've just shown that >>> you dont even know the meaning of the word. >> >> Let's put it this way, if you've got to carry a piece around to get a >> smile from your neighbour, it's kind of like holding up the bank, only >> the payoff's not in money, it's in behaviour... > > I alreadu said that no one else knows I carry, so again, how is merely > possessing property "initiating" force. > You said that afterr the concealed carries started, "people were so much more friendly." The concealed carry legislation was initiated by the pro-gun lobby, which you are part of, and that legislation warns everybody that whoever is standing beside them could be carrying. So, if that legislation "forces" people to smile, the gun lobby is robbing people of their right to be themselves... Therefore, you are using the force of a gun threat to achieve a behavioural end... Simple... >>>> You don't actually have to show it to use it in a violent, offensive >>>> manner... >>> >>> Huh? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - Jane Galt >> >> Think about it... I'm sure you'll figure it out, eventually... > > You havent. > > > > -- > - Jane Galt Think, Jane, think... Take Care, Dudley |