Best Coolpix for HD and low light too?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Peter on 24 Jun 2010 20:55 "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9DA1B083EBD4JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote : > >> The original premise has changed. in the early 70s some of my friends >> would not even get a response to their resumes, suddenly become actively >> recruited when they Anglicised their name. At a State school, SUNY >> Binghamton where the student body waas about 30% Jewish held >> examinations on Jewish holy days. About this time I met Rabbi Kahane. He >> strongely influenced me to become active in JDL to help right these and >> other wrongs. I gradually recognized that JDL methods were not a >> solution that I could agree with. > > What? Being armed for one's defense? Whoosh! > > >>> >>> My response - suggestion, if you will - was to Jane, though. She's the >>> one looking for an outlet for her aggression. >> >> The attitude is more one of insecurity. I am also not convinced that she >> is a she. > > I'm not convinced that you're an adult human. > Great response! Did you think of that all by yourself? -- Peter
From: Peter on 24 Jun 2010 21:08 "Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message news:Xns9DA1B371F9025JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... > "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote : > >> >> As a wannabe linguist I disagree with your statement. >> His/her writing clearly shows no opinions at all = only the capability of >> quoting the opinions of others. >> > > All you have are the lies and smears of the classic marxist useful idiot. > Another original thought. Learn to read; learn to think; Take a course in logic 101 and get a passing grade. Then perhaps you will find an outlet for your hostility caused by your unhappy childhood. Oh yes, not that it's any of your business, but I actively campaigned and voted for Goldwater and Nixon. Your reference to me as a marxist is the typical reaction of one with nothing intelligent to say. Bye Come back when you have something original to say. -- Peter
From: tony cooper on 24 Jun 2010 21:26 On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:55:43 -0400, "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >"Jane Galt" <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote in message >news:Xns9DA1B083EBD4JaneGgulchxyz(a)216.196.97.142... >> "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote : >> >>> The original premise has changed. in the early 70s some of my friends >>> would not even get a response to their resumes, suddenly become actively >>> recruited when they Anglicised their name. At a State school, SUNY >>> Binghamton where the student body waas about 30% Jewish held >>> examinations on Jewish holy days. About this time I met Rabbi Kahane. He >>> strongely influenced me to become active in JDL to help right these and >>> other wrongs. I gradually recognized that JDL methods were not a >>> solution that I could agree with. >> >> What? Being armed for one's defense? > >Whoosh! > >> >> >>>> >>>> My response - suggestion, if you will - was to Jane, though. She's the >>>> one looking for an outlet for her aggression. >>> >>> The attitude is more one of insecurity. I am also not convinced that she >>> is a she. >> >> I'm not convinced that you're an adult human. >> > > >Great response! >Did you think of that all by yourself? When she has to rely on her own thinking, instead of a cut/paste quote, you don't get much. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Ray Fischer on 25 Jun 2010 03:16 Jane Galt <Jane_G(a)gulch.xyz> wrote: >"Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote : >> As a wannabe linguist I disagree with your statement. >> His/her writing clearly shows no opinions at all = only the capability of >> quoting the opinions of others. > >All you have are the lies and smears of the classic marxist useful idiot. "Lies and smears" like, for example, "marxist useful idiot"? -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 30 Jun 2010 00:36
John Turco <jtur(a)concentric.net> wrote: >Pete wrote: >> Generally, children are able to focus on objects 5 inches away or less; >> by our mid-forties the closest distance for many of us is 20 inches or >> further. > >I've been nearsighted, since my teenage years (I believe I first noticed >it, in 1973). Today, my close-up vision is very sharp (5 inches, easily). Sharp from 4.75 inches to 5.25 inches. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |