From: Wayne C. Morris on
In article <jwolf6589-0B81F5.19345001042010(a)nntp.charter.net>,
John <jwolf6589(a)NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

> I use Newswatcher. But Panic is charging big bucks for a commercial
> client.

I'd hardly call $29 "big bucks".

> Is "unison" a better client or the best of the best for the Mac?
> Unison looks better for binary groups (which I do not use).

"Best" is strictly a matter of preference, especially when it comes to usenet
clients. I believe Unison has a trial period, so try it and decide whether you
like it more than MT-NW, and whether it's worth $29 to you.
From: Tempuser on
On 4/1/10 5:34 PM, John wrote:
> I use Newswatcher. But Panic is charging big bucks for a commercial
> client. Is "unison" a better client or the best of the best for the Mac?
> Unison looks better for binary groups (which I do not use).
>
>
> John
"Best" is in the eye of the beholder. I have been using Mozilla's
Thunderbird (currently @ Version 3.0.4 for Mac). I use it under
Windows OS as well. Have been using it from the time it was born
as Netscape Messenger (pre-AOL purchase of Netscape).
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on
John wrote:

> Is "unison" a better client or the best of the best for the Mac?

Just to emphasize how silly your question is, let me tell you that
alpine is the best news client. (I probably will be switching back to
it soon as I've found that SeaMonkey has all the drawbacks of Thunderbird.

The reason that I consider alpine the best is that there is one feature
that is a requirement for me (but for few other people). I insist that
my newsreader is also a good IMAP client. So I've pretty much been
stuck with Thunderbird or alpine.

-j

--
Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/
I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts
Reply-To address is valid
From: Ian Gregory on
On 2010-04-02, Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody(a)goldmark.org> wrote:
> John wrote:
>
>> Is "unison" a better client or the best of the best for the Mac?
>
> Just to emphasize how silly your question is, let me tell you that
> alpine is the best news client.

Whereas I would say slrn is, and Paris Texas is the best film etc.

Ian

--
Ian Gregory
http://www.zenatode.org.uk/
From: Doug Anderson on
Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> writes:

> On 2010-04-02, Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody(a)goldmark.org> wrote:
> > John wrote:
> >
> >> Is "unison" a better client or the best of the best for the Mac?
> >
> > Just to emphasize how silly your question is, let me tell you that
> > alpine is the best news client.
>
> Whereas I would say slrn is, and Paris Texas is the best film etc.

No, gnus is the best news client, and Blood Simple is the best film!