Both Avira and Malwarebytes claiming GamersGate patches are Trojans
in [Spyware]
|
Prev: Another Crock Of Fuvg Spyware Program
Next: Both Avira and Malwarebytes claiming GamersGate patches areTrojans
From: Wile E. Coyote on 1 Dec 2009 15:14 John Mason Jr wrote: > It is true that Dustin is often here, however for fastest results I > would reccommend the malwarebytes support forums > > They ask that you run the mbam.exe with the /developer switch and post > the log Yes, I know, but I hate going through the hassle of registering on web forums just to make one post and is why I post here instead. The developers know that the smarter people still use Usenet and not pussified web forums. ;)
From: use_a_hammer on 2 Dec 2009 16:32 On Nov 28, 7:59 pm, "Wile E. Coyote" <coy...(a)ACME.invalid> wrote: > David H. Lipman wrote: > > It is also presumptuaous tho say because of the above factor, anti malware is flawed. On > > the contrary, your presumption is flawed. > > No it isn't because it is set back to default heuristics mode already > and I am a betting man that if I installed Avast it would not give me > the same false positive so that would make both Avira and Malwarebytes > flawed in their detection ability. I have not installed Avast so have no > idea if it will detect those same two game patches as Trojans but from > past experience of using Avast I am betting it won't. Up to the challenge? Then install Avast and stop whining about it.
From: Dustin Cook on 2 Dec 2009 16:57 "Wile E. Coyote" <coyote(a)ACME.invalid> wrote in news:AOeRm.8321$Lq5.3457 @newsfe20.iad: > John Mason Jr wrote: > >> It is true that Dustin is often here, however for fastest results I >> would reccommend the malwarebytes support forums >> >> They ask that you run the mbam.exe with the /developer switch and post >> the log > > Yes, I know, but I hate going through the hassle of registering on web > forums just to make one post and is why I post here instead. The > developers know that the smarter people still use Usenet and not > pussified web forums. ;) We maintain our forum for the benefit of our users. In fact,it really is the best way for you to contact us with any problems with the software. We can get them cleared up quickly for you this way. -- Dustin Cook [Malware Researcher] MalwareBytes - http://www.malwarebytes.org BugHunter - http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
From: David H. Lipman on 2 Dec 2009 17:00 From: <use_a_hammer(a)yahoo.com> | On Nov 28, 7:59 pm, "Wile E. Coyote" <coy...(a)ACME.invalid> wrote: >> David H. Lipman wrote: >> > It is also presumptuaous tho say because of the above factor, anti malware is >> flawed. On >> > the contrary, your presumption is flawed. >> No it isn't because it is set back to default heuristics mode already >> and I am a betting man that if I installed Avast it would not give me >> the same false positive so that would make both Avira and Malwarebytes >> flawed in their detection ability. I have not installed Avast so have no >> idea if it will detect those same two game patches as Trojans but from >> past experience of using Avast I am betting it won't. Up to the challenge? | Then install Avast and stop whining about it. You mean the anti virus software that had a False Positive of VBS:Zulu on Microsoft web pages that lasted 2 months ? -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: Wile E. Coyote on 1 Dec 2009 15:33
Maximus the Mad wrote: > I am not going to search the net for the file you're talking about but > here are two links where you should post your issues. > http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/ > http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?langid=1 I don't feel like registering for web forums. I can't remember the name of the web site that scans files for you over the web using multiple scanners and want to scan the file there to see what results I get. You know the site I am talking about? |